Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Trends and management
Reference:

Rozin, V.M., Golubkova, L.G. Deficit as a form of government.

Abstract: The authors provide analysis of deficit broadly understood as a modern social phenomenon, which is formed by the leading means and styles of human life and involvement of the people in the Internet and mobile communications, rather than just deficit in goods and services. It is shown that the connection between such a deficit and forms of government, as well as between a deficit and the attempts of a human being to understand what is going on. The authors compare cultural models of government and society in Russia and in the West. The authors discuss the concept of “conspiracy theory”, showing that coordination of actions of various social subjects is directed by meta-narratives and ability to reach agreement with the others, rather than by this theory. The article applies the methodology of comparative analysis, including cultural and historic analysis, as well as virtual internal dialog as a type of thinking experiment. As a result, it was shown that regular deficit in the modern culture is substituted with the new type of deficit, which basically “enslaves” a person, depriving a person of his freedom. It is also shown that the Internet and forms of mobile communications play an important role in it, and the forms of management and governance become more and more intricate, while being different in Russia and in the West.


Keywords:

deficit, power, Internet, mobile communications, freedom, personality, subject, culture, society, modernity.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. M.V. Popova, V.V. Savchenko K osmysleniyu fenomena «informatsionnaya kul'tura». // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-3.-C. 25-37.
2. Rozin V.M. K ponimaniyu osnovanii obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 30-52. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.380. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_380.html
3. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Problemy informatsionno-kommunikatsionnogo potentsiala sovremennogo obshchestva // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-12.-C. 70-96. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10537. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10537.html
4. Zharovskaya I.M. Sotsial'naya kul'tura naroda i kontsept gosudarstvennoi vlasti: problemy sootnosheniya // Pravo i politika.-2013.-7.-C. 915-918. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.7.7246.
5. Berman G.Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. M., 1998.
6. Shilovskaya N.S. Chelovek kak sub''ekt, bytie i bytie sub''ekta v istorii i sovremennosti // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-1.-C. 171-203. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_88.html
7. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Transformatsiya vlasti v protsesse postroeniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-9.-C. 20-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.9.9053. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_9053.html
8. Bronnikov I.A. Internet kak resurs gosudarstva // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 210-248. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.8999. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_8999.html
9. Khaidegger M. Vopros o tekhnike // Vremya i bytie. M., 1993. S. 235.
10. Fuko M. Volya k istine. Po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. M., 1996. S. 192.
11. xttp://index.gdf.ru/zournal/cont16.xtml.
12. Alekseeva T.A. Vlast' // NFE. T.1. M., 2000. S. 418.
13. Rybakova O.B.. Religioznyi aspekt legitimatsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9306.
14. Aleinikov A.V., Osipov I.D.. Vlast' i predprinimatel'stvo v Rossii: opyt istoriko-kul'turnogo analiza institutsional'nykh traektorii. Stat'ya 1. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10369.
15. Andreev I.L.. MOZG, VREMYa, VLAST'': evolyutsiya virtual'noi real'nosti v real'nuyu virtual'nost' // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.10051.
16. Popova A.D.. Evolyutsiya obshchestvennogo soznaniya kak faktor formirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.12.10430.
17. I.V. Egorova. Khanna Arendt o massovoi kul'ture // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434Kh.2013.2.9596.
18. Tokar' N.O.. Politicheskaya sotsializatsiya molodezhi v usloviyakh demokratizatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.8792.
19. Karpovich O.G.. Demokratiya i demokratizatsiya v kontekste novogo miroporyadka // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.8.9142.
20. Goncharov V.V.. Gosudarstvennaya vlast': ponyatie i sushchnost' // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.7.2466.
21. S.A. Nikol'skii. Poet i Vlast' (Zametki o vospriyatii Osipom i Nadezhdoi Mandel'shtam «vremeni bol'shevikov») // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.6.8040.
22. T. A. Parkhomenko. Prelyudiya stalinskoi epokhi: bor'ba za vlast' i vybor vozhdya v 1922–1925 godakh // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2013. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2013.02.5.
23. V.M. Rozin. Osobennosti obshchestvenno-politicheskogo diskursa // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
24. G.P. Khorina. Vlast' i demokratiya v russkoi kul'ture // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
25. A.V. Aleinikov. Strukturnye predposylki konfliktnoi sopryazhennosti biznesa i vlasti: rossiiskii kontekst // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
26. Rubanik S.A.. Erikh Fromm o gosudarstvenno-pravovom razvitii v sovremennom globaliziruemom mire // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.5993.
27. P.S. Gurevich. Reforma vs revolyutsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.9059.
28. I. D. Koroeva. Filosofiya vzaimodeistviya vlasti i naroda // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
29. F. K. Esieva. Evolyutsiya vysshikh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti na zavershayushchem etape razvitiya sovetskoi gosudarstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – S. 104-107
30. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Transformatsiya vlasti v protsesse postroeniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 9. - C. 20 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.9.9053. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_9053.html
31. Uvarov A.A. O roli gosudarstva v formirovanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 7. - C. 1 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8782. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8782.html