Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Osadchaya, A.S. On the issue of functions of the component elements of a crime

Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the functions within the component elements of crime. Within the general theory of law when the legal function was analyzed the attention of the scientists was usually centered upon its role within the system of social relations. The functions reflect the most significant, most important legal features, characterizing law in motion, reflecting its dynamic nature. Therefore, the functions of law are the main directions of legal influence, reflecting the role of law in bringing order into social relations. The definition of functions of constituent elements of a crime was for the first time used by Y.M. Brainin, who has noted that the constituent elements of crime as a criminal law institute performed two functions. M.I. Bazhanov considered that the functions of the constituent elements include fundamental, guaranteeing, distinguishing, procedural, dogmatic, qualificational, descriptive, restrictive, axiological, dogmatic and praxeological functions. The author considers that the classification provided by M.I. Bazhanov is quite acceptable with some clarifications offered by the author.


Keywords:

functions, functions of law, functions of the constituent elements of crime, elements of crime, classification, functions of legal categories, qualification, criminal responsibility, bases for criminal responsibility, crime.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bazhanov M.I. K voprosu o funktsiyakh sostava prestupleniya. ― Sbornik kratkikh tezisov dokladov i nauchnykh soobshcheniy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii po itogam nauchno-issledovatel'skikh rabot, vypolnennykh professorsko-prepodavatel'skim sostavom Ukrainskoy yuridicheskoy akademii v 1992 godu. – Kh.: Ukrainskaya yuridicheskaya akademiya, 1993.― S. 105-107.
2. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava: Kurs v dvukh tomakh. T 1. M.: Yurid. lit.,1981.― 355 s.
3. Bazhanov M.I. O funktsiyakh sostava prestupleniya (protsessual'naya funktsiya). // Problemy zakonnosti: Resb. mezhvedomstv. nauchn. sb. 1995. ¹ 29 ― Khar'kov,1995.― S. 99.
4. Zinchenko I. A. Sostavnye prestupleniya. Kh.: SPD FO Vapnyarchuk N. M., 2005. – 176 s
5. Kerimov D. A. Filosofskie osnovaniya politiko-pravovykh issledovaniy. M.: Mysl', 1986.―332 s.
6. Kudryavtsev V. N. Obshchaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dopoln. – M., Yurist', 2001. ― 304 s.
7. Lyapunov Yu., Rodina L. Funktsii sostava prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2005.-¹ 3 ― S. 44-48.
8. Rad'ko T. N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava – M.: Yuniti-Dana: Zakon i pravo, 2005. – 576 s.
9. Rassolov M. M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik dlya vuzov / M. M. Rassolov.-M.: Yurayt; Vysshee obrazovanie, 2010. – 635 s.
10. Tkachenko Yu. G. Metodologicheskie voprosy teorii pravootnosheniy.-M: Yurid. lit, 1980. – 176 s.
11. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / kol. avtorov; otv. red. A. V. Mal'ko.-4-e izd., ster.-M.: KNORUS, 2011. ― 400 s.
12. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. O.V. Martyshina.-M.: Norma, 2007. – 496 s.
13. Tkesheliadze G. T. Sudebnaya praktika i ugolovnyy zakon. ― Tbilisi, 1975 – 175 s.
14. Filimonov V. D. Okhranitel'naya funktsiya ugolovnogo prava.-SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2003.― 198 s.
15. Brayn³n Ya. M. Osnovn³ pitannya zagal'nogo vchennya pro sklad zlochinu. – Vidavnitstvo Ki¿vs'kogo un³versitetu, 1964.― 188 s.
16. Krivochenko L. M. Klasif³kts³ya zlochin³v za stupenem tyazhkost³ u Krim³nal'nomu kodeks³ Ukra¿ni.-K.: Yur³nkom ²nter, 2010. ― 120 s.
17. Navrots'kiy V. O. Teoretichn³ problemi krim³nal'no-pravovo¿ kval³f³kats³¿. – K.: At³ka, ― 1999. – 464 s.