Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Amelkov, N.S. Provision of qualified legal aid to the claimant in criminal judicial proceedings

Abstract: This article concerns the problem of provision of legal aid by an advocate to a claimant as a person taking part in the proceedings at the stage of initiation of a criminal case, preliminary investigation and judicial proceedings. The author have analyzed the procedural position of claimant considering the amendments to the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation with the Federal Law N. 23-FZ of March 4, 2013 “On amendments into Art. 62 and 303 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation”. The author evaluates the issues of provision of qualified legal aid to claimant at the stage of his explanations to the officials, and the problems of participation of an advocate when holding a search of at the place of residence of a claimant, who is not a suspect or an accused, but who has informed about the violations which took place during such a search. Based upon the studies the author offers to amend the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation by including a new Art. 60.1 “Claimant”, providing for his procedural position and his right for qualified legal aid.


Keywords:

claimant, advocate, qualified legal aid, initiation of a criminal case, holding a search, taking explanations, criminal procedural interest, criminal judicial proceedings.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Idirov E.I. Sledstvennyi sud'ya v proekte novogo UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan // Voprosy prava i politiki. 2013. 9. C. 14-26.
2. Yarovenko V.V. Problemy primeneniya spetsial'nykh znanii pri issledovanii razlichnykh vidov ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya i boepripasov // Voprosy prava i politiki. 2012. 2. C. 146-163. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.2.165.
3. Aleksova A.V., Yarovenko V.V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy provedeniya sudebno-ballisticheskoi ekspertizy po ustanovleniyu otnosimosti ob''ekta // Voprosy prava i politiki. 2013. 1. C. 223-250.
4. Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo. 2013. 2. C. 62-76.
5. Ushakov A.Yu. O nekotorykh sluchayakh, zatrudnyayushchikh dostup grazhdan k pravosudiyu v ramkakh stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Yuridicheskii mir. 2012. ¹ 10. S. 32-34.
6. Sinenko S.A. Pravovoi status litsa, poterpevshego ot prestupleniya, v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 29-31.
7. Sumin A.A. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya stat'i 144 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Advokat. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 48-59.
8. Sementsov V., Burger B. Protsessual'noe polozhenie advokata v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnyi protsess. ¹
9. Demidov I.F. Zayavitel' v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse // Voprosy bor'by s prestupnost'yu. 1982. ¹ 36. S. 85-90.
10. Larin E.G. Obespechenie uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva kvalifitsirovannoi yuridicheskoi pomoshch'yu pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deistvii. Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk, Omsk. 2008.