Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Erpyleva, N.Y., Klevchenkova, M.N. Unification of norms of international judicial jurisdiction in the international procedural law

Abstract: This article is devoted to the topical issues regarding unification of the norms on international judicial jurisdiction in the international procedural law, which is regarded by the authors as a branch of international private law. The authors view three groups of issues: establishing international judicial jurisdiction in the Russian domestic legislation and international treaties, to which Russia is a party, establishing international judicial jurisdiction in the domestic law of England, USA and France, special judicial injunctions and fines in English, American and French law. The authors analyze types of international judicial jurisdiction, including, general, exclusive and treaty-based jurisdiction, and also study an institution of “ forum non conveniens”, which is not known to the international civil procedural law of Russia. Much attention is paid by the authors to the special judicial orders of English, American and French courts, including the anti-suit injunctions, Mareva injunction, and astreinte.


Keywords:

judicial jurisdiction, state court, prorogation treaty, civil judicial procedure, judicial injunction, judicial prohibition, procedural institution, judicial fine, judicial doctrine, international procedural law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Antonov I.V., Ruzhitskaya N.V. Mekhanizm razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh sporov // Zakon. 2008. ¹ 1.
2. Belousova O.V. Istochniki pravovogo regulirovaniya v ramkakh Evropeyskogo Soyuza: unifikatsiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pra-vovedeniya. 2011. ¹ 6.
3. Belyaeva N.G. Osobennosti rassmotreniya del s uchastiem inostrannykh lits v arbitrazhnom sude: Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2012.
4. Vinogradova E.A., Filatova M.A. Printsipy transgranichnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa (ALI / UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure). M., 2011.
5. Vorontsova I.V. Ob obyazatel'nosti mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov po voprosam grazhdanskogo protsessa // Sovremennoe pravo. 2011. ¹ 3.
6. Eliseev N.G., Vershinina E.V. Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: Uchebnoe poso-bie. M., 2011.
7. Komarov A.S. Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov UNIDRUA 2010 (per. s angl. yaz.). M., 2013.
8. Mamaev A.A. Mezhdunarodnaya sudebnaya yurisdiktsiya po transgranichnym grazhdanskim delam. M., 2008.
9. Osavelyuk E.A. Mezhdunarodnyy grazhdanskiy protsess Rossii. M., 2006.
10. Osminin B.I. Razreshenie kolliziy mezhdu vnutrigosudarstvennym pravom i mezhdunarodnymi dogovorami // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2013. ¹ 1.
11. Petrova M.M. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya dokazatel'stv v mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom protsesse // Advokat. 2011. ¹
12. Stepin A.B. Ponyatie i sushchnost' mezhdunarodnykh standartov zashchity chastnogo prava // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 1.
13. Khotsanov D.A. Ustanovlenie soderzhaniya inostrannykh pravovykh norm v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. M., 2012.
14. Shvakin S.V. Problemy mezhdunarodnogo vzaimodeystviya natsional'nykh pravovykh sistem // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 6.
15. Yurova N.M. Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: Teoreticheskie osnovy imple-mentatsii norm v pravovoy sisteme RF. M., 2008