Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Rossinskaya, E.R., Galyashina, E.I. On the issue of form and contents of expert opinion for anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and their drafts

Abstract: In this article the authors discuss nature of normative legal text, provide the definition of anticorruption expertise of normative legal acts, define object, target, goals and aims of this expertise, as well as forms and contents of expert opinion for anti-corruption expertise through the prism of general theory of judicial expertise as a methodological basis for any expert activity. The authors analyze requirements to competence of experts, structure of an opinion in general and contents of its main constituent parts: introduction, research, synthesis, and conclusions. It is noted that the legislative provisions for typical corruptogenic factors provides for two directions for anti-corruption expert evaluation. These directions are uncovering and providing basis for typical corruptogenic factors as provided for in a general method. Based upon the above-mentioned matters, the authors express their opinion on the means for solving legal, scientific, methodological and organizational problems of anti-corruption expertise of normative legal acts and legislative drafts.


Keywords:

corruption, corruptogenic factor, method, anti-corruption expertise, normative legal acts, draft of a normative legal act, normative legal text, legal expertise, legal linguistic expertise, expert opinion.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Dzhavadov F.M. Ekspertnaya deyatel'nost' i razvitie nauki o sudebnoy ekspertize. — Baku. Elm, 1998.
2. Orlov Yu.K. Zaklyuchenie eksperta i ego otsenka po ugolovnym delam: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Yurist, 1995.
3. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. Kriminalistika i teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy kak istochni-ki metodologii antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proek-tov // Kriminalist' pervopechatnyy. ¹
4. — Khar'kov, 2012. 4. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. Teoretiko-kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie antikorruptsi-onnoy ekspertizy normativnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Preduprezhdenie prestupnosti. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal Kazakhstanskoy kriminologicheskoy assotsiatsii. — ¹ 2. — 2012.
5. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. Formirovanie osnov antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy norma-tivnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov na baze obshchey teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy // Voro-nezhskie kriminalisticheskie chteniya. — ¹ 14. — 2012.
6. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy: uchebnik // pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy. — M.: Norma, 2009.
7. Kudashkin A.V. K voprosu o predmete i ob'ekte antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy // Admini-strativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. — 2010. — ¹
8. — C. 26-30. 8. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. O kompleksnosti antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy normativ-no-pravovykh tekstov // LEX RUSSICA (RUSS KIY ZAKON). — 2012. — ¹ 5. — C. 1048–1063