Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Akopdzhanovna M.O. The criteria for effectiveness of a disposition of a criminal legal norm

Abstract: This article is dedicated to the research of the criteria for effectiveness of a disposition of a criminal legal norm that is regulated by the legislation and developed by the juridical science and law enforcement practice. It reflects the basis of criminal responsibility (committing an act that contains all characteristics of a crime) and principles thereof (principle of legality, principle of equality of citizens before the law, principle of guilt, principle of justice, principle of humanism), and circumstances that eliminate, mitigate, or aggravate criminal responsibility. This research also includes the stages of functioning of a disposition of a criminal legal norm and the issues of social determination to construct it. In the course of research the author reveals the structure of the disposition of a criminal legal norm and examines the questions of its usefulness, quality, necessity, and efficiency. The following were attributed to the effectiveness of a disposition of a criminal legal norm: timeliness of enacting or abolishing a criminal legal norm; precision with which it reflects the most important criteria of the social danger of a delict; determination of the type and size of a sanction based on its impact upon a specific act; timeliness of implementation of the criminal legal norm towards specific acts; precision of qualification; fairness of punishment.


Keywords:

Disposition, criminal law, norm, criteria, effectiveness, regulation, legislation, practice, principles.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zharikov Yu.S. Effektivnost' ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya kak neobkhodimaya predposylka povysheniya preventivnogo potentsiala ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2010.-¹ 1. – S. 34-39.
2. Maksurov A.A. K voprosu ob effektivnosti yuridicheskoy praktiki // http://www.maksurov.ru.
3. Nersesyants V.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. Paragraf 7.1. «Ponyatie, mekhanizm i effektivnost' deystviya prava». M.: INFRA-M, 1999. S. 475–482.
4. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya prestupnoy i pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. Referativnyy zhurnal. Vypusk 1 / pod red. L.M. Timofeeva i Yu.V. Latovoy. M., 1999.
5. Kudashkin A.V., Dmitriev D.A. K voprosu o neobkhodimosti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya provedeniya organami prokuratury antikorruptsionnoy ekspertizy v tselyakh povysheniya ee effektivnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 4. - C. 87 - 91.
6. Tyurina S.Yu., Borisov N.I. Obrashcheniya grazhdan kak instrument povysheniya effektivnosti vzaimodeystviya naseleniya i vlasti: normativno-pravovoe regulirovanie i praktika // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 10. - C. 12 - 19.
7. A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm ob ideal'noy sovokupnosti prestupleniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
8. R. M. Usmanova Rol' politicheskikh norm v publichnom regulirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 3. - C. 535 - 540.
9. Polishchuk D.A. Kriterial'naya baza otsenki effektivnosti pravookhranitel'noy deyatel'nosti // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 1 - 8. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9270.html
10. A.S. Smbatyan Kriterii effektivnosti organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 6. - C. 87 - 93.
11. D.V. Morozov Publichnoe pravo i kollizionnoe regulirovanie (sravnitel'no–pravovoy analiz zakonodatel'stva o mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2011. - 2. - C. 166 - 169.