Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Legal Studies
Reference:

The Relations Between the Institution of Procedural Responsibility, Legal Relationships and Legal Practice
Chuklova Elena Valerievna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at the Department of entrepreneurial and labour law of Togliatti State University

445041, Russia, Togliatti, ul. Gidrotekhnicheskaya, 9-141

elenachuklova@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2019.10.30890

Review date:

27-09-2019


Publish date:

07-11-2019


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the institution of procedural responsibility and its relations with legal relationships and legal practice. In her research Chuklova defines genetic, coordination, subordination and functional relations. According to the author, implementation of procedural responsibility provisions creates both material and procedural legal relations. The author demonstrates that the institution of procedural responsibility either relates to legal relationships at the functional genetic level disregarding the definition of a particular legal relationship or acts as a result of legal regulation or means of regulation. There should be legal grounds for creating such an institution, too. The institution of procedural responsibility creates conditions for discovering the truth in criminal, civil or administrative cases, thus demonstrating subordination relations. The research is based on general and special research methods such as comparative law, formal law analysis, functional and systems approaches, etc. As a result of the research, the author concludes that judicial practice is a coordination link between procedural form and material law, however, many court decisions demonstrate a negative tendency in implementation of the procedural responsibility provisions when there is a total substitution of one term with the other. For example, contempt of court includes such actions as numerous continuous disqualifications, non-submission of documents, failure to appear in court, non-compliance with court orders, negative remarks about a judge's professional or personal qualities. The article is funded by The Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 19-011-00103 А 'Legal Responsibility in Russia's Legal System: the Concept of Interaction, Interconnection and Elimination of Contradictions with Other Elements of Legal System'. 

Keywords: legal practice, coordination relations, genetic relations, institute of procedural responsibility, legal liability, procedural legal relationship, contempt of court, abuse of right, procedural offense, challenge
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Khalfina R.O. Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii. M.: Yur.lit. 1974. 340 s.
2.
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' (teoreticheskie voprosy). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyar. un-t, 1995. 120s.
3.
Kivel' V.N. Ponyatie i obshchaya kharakteristika yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti kak elementa konstitutsionno-pravovogo statusa lichnosti // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2017. N 8. S. 12-17.
4.
Kisin V.R., Popugaev Yu.I. Etapy realizatsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti i problemy ikh pravovogo regulirovaniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. N 8. S. 25-32.
5.
Vaskevich K.N. Vozmozhnosti sistemnogo podkhoda pri issledovanii yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti za nalogovye pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. N 12. S. 1257-1263.
6.
Zherebtsov A.N., Vertinskaya A.N. Differentsiatsiya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti: ponyatie, kriterii, znachenie // Sovremennoe pravo. 2018. N 9. S. 24-29.
7.
Printsipy i pravootnosheniya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. Monografiya / Lipinskii D.A.; Pod red.: Khachaturov R.L. M., 2003. 231 c.
8.
Stadii yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.01 / Shindyapina M.D. M., 1996. 211 c.
9.
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i praktiki. Sbornik statei / Otv. red.: Khamaneva N.Yu. M.: Izd-vo IGiP RAN, 2005. 286 c.
10.
Serkov P.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiiskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody: monografiya. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2012. 480 s.
11.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.07.2005 N 9-P "Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii stat'i 113 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanki G.A. Polyakovoi i zaprosom Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga" // "Ekonomika i zhizn'", N 29, 2005.
12.
Kurtsev I.A. Problemy realizatsii okhranitel'noi funktsii prava: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2008. 176s.
13.
Karkhalev D.N. Ponyatie okhranitel'nogo pravootnosheniya v chastnom prave // "Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo", 2008, N 4. S.2-4.
14.
Teoriya prava / Alekseev S.S. 2-e izd., stereotip. Khar'kov: BEK, 1994. 224 c.
15.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti: Uchebnik. Otv. red. Yu.V. Gracheva, A.I. Chuchaev. Kontrakt, 2017. 384s.
16.
Otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu / Samoshchenko I.S., Farukshin M.Kh. M.: Yurid. lit., 1971. 240 c.
17.
Tsechoev V.K., Shvanderova A.R. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik. M.: Prometei, 2017. 330 s.
18.
Nenashev M.M. O sootnoshenii regulyativnykh, okhranitel'nykh i protsessual'nykh pravootnoshenii // Iski i sudebnye resheniya: Sbornik statei / R.S. Bevzenko, E.A. Belyanevich, I.A. Voitko i dr.; pod red. M.A. Rozhkovoi. M.: Statut, 2009. 363 s.
19.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.07.2004 N 15-P "Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti 5 stat'i 59 Arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosami Gosudarstvennogo Sobraniya-Kurultaya Respubliki Bashkortostan, Gubernatora Yaroslavskoi oblasti, Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnoyarskogo kraya, zhalobami ryada organizatsii i grazhdan" // "Rossiiskaya gazeta", N 158, 27.07.2004.
20.
Gurvich M.A. Osnovnye cherty grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo pravootnosheniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1972. N 2. S.29-36.
21.
Kurs sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava: Teoreticheskie osnovy pravosudiya po grazhdanskim delam. V 2-kh tomakh. T. 1 / Abova T.E., Gureev P.P., Dobrovol'skii A.A., Mel'nikov A.A., i dr.; Redkol.: Gureev P.P., Dobrovol'skii A.A., Mel'nikov A.A. (Otv. red.), Tadevosyan V.S., Trubnikov P.Ya.-M.: Nauka, 1981. 464 c.
22.
Eliseikin P.F. Grazhdanskie protsessual'nye pravootnosheniya. Yaroslavl': YarGU, 1975. 93s.
23.
Kinsburskaya V.A. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie zakonodatel'stva o nalogakh i sborakh. M.: Yustitsinform, 2013. 204 s.
24.
Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya nauki sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava / Chechina N.A. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1987. 104 c.
25.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 13.06.2017 N 21 "O primenenii sudami mer protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya pri rassmotrenii administrativnykh del" // "Rossiiskaya gazeta", N 132, 20.06.2017.
26.
Postanovlenie Tret'ego arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 29.12.2011 po delu N A74-4025/2010 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
27.
Yudin A. Otvetstvennost' za neuvazhenie k sudu // "EZh-Yurist", 2006, N 20.
28.
Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Saratovskoi oblasti ot 03.08.2017 po delu N A57-17332/2012 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
29.
Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 20.09.2017 po delu N A57-17332/2012 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
30.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 19.12.2017 N F06-2775/2013 po delu N A57-17332/2012 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
31.
Kommentarii k Kodeksu administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (poglavnyi) / O.V. Aksenova, S.A. Aleshukina, N.A. Antonova i dr.; pod red. A.A. Murav'eva. Moskva: Prospekt, 2015. 408 s.
32.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 06.03.2018 N 302-ES17-12695(2) po delu N A33-2123/2015 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
33.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 20.01.2015 N F09-9355/14 po delu N A76-11387/2014 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
34.
Postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 12.03.2013 N 06AP-903/2013 po delu N A73-13505/2012 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
35.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 05.10.2018 N F05-15643/2018 po delu N A40-13789/2018 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
36.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25.12.2018 N 305-KG18-21986 po delu N A40-13789/2018 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
37.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 22.03.2012 N 559-O-O // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
38.
Informatsiya o Postanovlenii ESPCh ot 16.01.2018 po delu "Cheferin (Ceferin) protiv Slovenii" (zhaloba N 40975/08) // "Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossiiskoe izdanie", 2018, N 7.
39.
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 16.01.2013 N VAS-9593/12 po delu N A12-14976/2010 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
40.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2017 g. N 306-ES17-18791 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).
41.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 19.12.2017 N F06-2775/2013 po delu N A57-17332/2012 // URL: http://base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2019).