|
Space Research
Reference:
Lin M., Zhao X., Zi X., Guo P., Fan C.
Classification of Meteorological Satellite Ground System Applications
// Space Research.
2018. ¹ 1.
P. 335-341.
DOI: 10.7256/2453-8817.2018.1.26055 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=26055
Classification of Meteorological Satellite Ground System Applications
Lin' Manyun
100081, Kitai, g. Pekin, ul. Zhong Guancun Nandajie, 46
|
guop@cma.gov.cn
|
|
|
Chzhao Xiangang
100081, Kitai, g. Pekin, ul. Zhong Guancun Nandajie, 46
|
guop@cma.gov.cn
|
|
|
Tszy Seli
100081, Kitai, g. Pekin, ul. Zhong Guancun Nandajie, 46
|
guop@cma.gov.cn
|
|
|
Go Pen
100081, Kitai, g. Pekin, ul. Zhong Guancun Nandajie,, 46
|
guo_peng@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
Fan' Cunqun
100081, Kitai, g. Pekin, ul. Zhong Guancun Nandajie, 46
|
guop@cma.gov.cn
|
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2453-8817.2018.1.26055
Received:
18-04-2018
Published:
15-09-2018
Abstract:
Meteorological satellite ground application system carries a large number of applications. These applications deal with a variety of tasks. In order to classify these applications according to the resource consumption and improve the rational allocation of system resources, this paper introduces several application analysis algorithms. Firstly, the requirements are abstractly described, and then analyzed by hierarchical clustering algorithm. Finally, the benchmark analysis of resource consumption is given. Through the benchmark analysis of resource consumption, we will give a more accurate meteorological satellite ground application system.
Keywords:
Satellite, Ground Application System, Classification, Hierarchical Clustering, Software Model Verification, Application Parameters, Memory-loading, CPU-loading, IO-loading, Network-loading
References
1. Thüm, T., Apel, S., Schaefer, I., et al. (2014) A Classification and Survey of Analysis Strategies for Software Product Lines. ACM Computing Surveys, 47, 1-45. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2580950
2. Gómez, O.S., Juristo, N. and Vegas, S. (2014) Understanding Replication of Experiments in Software Engineering: A Classification. Information & Software Technology, 56, 1033-1048. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.004
3. Gabmeyer, S., Kaufmann, P. and Seidl, M. (2013) A Classification of Model Checking-Based Verification Approaches for Software Models. Proceedings of the STAF Workshop on Verification of Model Transformations (VOLT 2013), Budapest, 17 June 2013, 1-7.
4. Srinivas, C., Radhakrishna, V. and Rao, C.V.G. (2014) Clustering and Classification of Software Component for Efficient Component Retrieval and Building Component Reuse Libraries. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1044-1050. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.358
5. Rashwan, A. and Ormandjieva, O. (2013) Ontology-Based Classification of Non-Functional Requirements in Software Specifications: A New Corpus and SVM-Based Classifier. IEEE, Computer Software and Applications Conference. IEEE Computer Society, Kyoto, 22-26 July 2013, 381-386. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2013.64
6. Pancerz, K. (2015) On Selected Functionality of the Classification and Prediction Software System (CLAPSS). International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies, IEEE, Zilina, 7-9 July 2015, 278-285. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2015.7222984
7. Wahono, R.S., Herman, N.S. and Ahmad, S. (2014) A Comparison Framework of Classification Models for Software Defect Prediction. Advanced Science Letters, 20, 1945-1950. URL: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2014.5640
8. Naufal, M.F. and Rochimah, S. (2016) Software Complexity Metric-Based Defect Classification Using FARM with Preprocessing Step CFS and SMOTE a Preliminary Study. International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation. IEEE, Al Ain, 28 November 2016, 1-6. (9.} Peng, J., Elias, J.E., Thoreen, C.C., et al. (2003) Evaluation of Multidimensional Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for Large-Scale Protein Analysis: The Yeast Proteome. Journal of Proteome Research, 2, 43-50. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/pr025556v
|