Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2097,   Articles in work: 264 Declined articles: 887 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative responsibility of bankruptcy commissioners: dynamics and practice of application of the new provisions of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation
Vinnitskiy Andrey

Doctor of Law

Professor at the Department of Administrative Law of the Ural State Law University 

620137, Russia, Yekaterinburg, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 21

av_vinnitsky@soeka.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Abstract. The research subject is normative regulations about administrative responsibility of bankruptcy commissioners: blanket rules contained in the parts 3 and 3.1 of the article 14.13 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation in their system interrelation with other provisions of the Code and regulative provisions of bankruptcy legislation. The author studies and generalizes legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the vast judicial practice on the most important issues of administrative responsibility of bankruptcy commissioners. The author uses the set of methods of cognition used in the modern science, including the dialectical and materialistic method and the related general and specific scientific methods and general logical techniques (abstraction, analysis, synthesis, analogy, generalization, etc.). As a general scientific method, the author uses system analysis, as specific scientific methods – special-juridical and historical-juridical methods. The author substantiates the range of new changes in legislation on administrative responsibility of bankruptcy commissioners: 1) refusal of blanket composition of delictual rules and formalization of the system of compositions, which would properly differentiate offences and punishments for them; 2) formalization of alternative sanctions on all differentiated compositions of crimes or the possibility to impose punishments beyond the sanctions described in the provisions of the Special part of the Administrative Offences Code; 3) preservation of disqualification for gross and repeated infringements and infringements causing damage; 4) radical reduction of reasons for initiation of administrative procedures; 5) change of admissibility of cases. 
Keywords: bankruptcy, retraining, blanket rule, insignificance, proportionality, disqualification, bankruptcy commissioner, administrative offense, alternative sanctions, fine
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2017.12.24877
Article was received: 01-12-2017

Review date: 05-12-2017

Publish date: 16-12-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 29.12.2015 № 391-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2016. № 1 (chast' I). St. 11.
2.
Trofimova I. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' arbitrazhnykh upravlyayushchikh // Administrativnoe pravo. 2015. № 4. S. 69–74 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
3.
Otvetstvennost' za narusheniya antimonopol'nogo zakonodatel'stva: problemy teorii i praktiki: monografiya / Otv. red. S.V. Maksimov, S.A. Puzyrevskii. M., 2016 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». Abz. 677–678, 739–741).
4.
Serkov P.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v rossiiskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody: monografiya. M, 2012. § 4 glavy 2 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
5.
postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 25.06.2003 № 367 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil provedeniya arbitrazhnym upravlyayushchim finansovogo analiza // SZ RF. 2003. № 26. St. 2664.
6.
Prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii ot 23.07.2015 № 495 «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka provedeniya torgov v elektronnoi forme po prodazhe imushchestva ili predpriyatiya dolzhnikov v khode protsedur, primenyaemykh v dele o bankrotstve…» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7.
punkt 2 Osobogo mneniya sud'i KS RF A. N. Kokotova k Postanovleniyu KS RF ot 17.01.2013 № 1 P // SZ RF. 2013. № 4. St. 304.
8.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 23.10.1993 № 1090 «O Pravilakh dorozhnogo dvizheniya» // Sobranie aktov Prezidenta i Pravitel'stva RF.1993. № 47. St. 4531.
9.
Koshelkin S.Yu. Problemy proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya na sovremennom etape // Yuridicheskii mir. 2008. № 2 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
10.
Fargiev I.A. Chrezvychainoe smyagchenie ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2016. № 4. S. 85–92 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
11.
Dolgopolov K.A. Naznachenie bolee myagkogo nakazaniya, chem predusmotreno za dannoe prestuplenie, v ugolovnom prave Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2017. № 2. S. 15–18 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
12.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 31.12.2014 № 515-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'yu 4.1 Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // SZ RF. 2015. № 1 (chast' I). St. 68.
13.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 03.07.2016 № 316-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // SZ RF. 2016. № 27 (chast' II). St. 4249.
14.
materialy sudebnoi praktiki: postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.09.2014 i postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 23.01.2015 po delu № A03-7361/2014; postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 23.12.2014 po delu № A32-29452/2014, postanovlenie Vosemnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 30.01.2015 po delu № A34-5649/2014 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
15.
materialy sudebnoi praktiki: postanovlenie Sed'mogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.09.2014 i postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 23.01.2015 po delu № A03-7361/2014 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
16.
Vestnik VAS RF. 2004. № 8.
17.
postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.10.2011 po delu № A36-6861/2009 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 2.
18.
Gorb E.E., Stepenko V. E. K voprosu o priznanii administrativnykh pravonarushenii, sovershennykh arbitrazhnymi upravlyayushchimi, maloznachitel'nymi // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2016. № 12. S. 33–38 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
19.
Kas'yanov A. S. Maloznachitel'nost' narusheniya kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya arbitrazhnogo upravlyayushchego ot administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2015. № 9. S. 52–58 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
20.
opredelenie VS RF ot 21.07.2017 po delu № A57-24674/2016 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
21.
postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 21.06.2017 po delu № A43-34154/2016 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
22.
punkt 21 Postanovleniya Plenuma VS RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2005. 19 aprelya.
23.
Lomakina L.A. Ponyatie maloznachitel'nosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya v KoAP RF // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2012. № 9. S. 55–59 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
24.
materialy sudebnoi praktiki: postanovleniya Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 21.06.2017 po delu № A43-34154/2016 mozhno privesti i drugie: postanovlenie Semnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.05.2017 po delu № A50-26548/2016, postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Vostochno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 04.08.2017 po delu № A33-414/2017, postanovlenie Vtorogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.09.2017 po delu № A82-4043/2017; postanovleniya Tret'ego arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 05.07.2017 po delu № A33-27547/2016, ot 23.06.2017 po delu № A33-1340/2017, ot 16.05.2017 po delu № A33-414/2017 i dr. (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»)..
25.
materialy sudebnoi praktiki: postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 26.12.2016 po delu № A04-8042/2016 (ostavleno v sile postanovleniem Arbitrazhnogo suda Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 09.03.2017), postanovlenie Chetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.09.2017 po delu № A05-4688/2017, reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Sverdlovskoi oblasti Reshenie ot 18.10.2017 po delu № A60-36407/2017 i dr. (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
26.
postanovlenie Shestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 14.09.2017 po delu № A04-2505/2017 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
27.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Amurskoi oblasti ot 06.07.2017 po delu № A04-2505/2017 (SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»).
28.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 29.12.2015 № 391-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF. 2016. № 1 (chast' I). St. 11.
29.
SZ RF. 2013. № 30 (chast' I). St. 4035.
30.
materialy Avtomatizirovannoi sistemy obespecheniya zakonodatel'noi deyatel'nosti // http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/ (Spravka)?OpenAgent&RN=295382-7.