Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 746 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Forms of rightful behavior of a person performing investigative activities among accomplices in crime
Shkabin Gennadiy Sergeevich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at Kikotia Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation 

117437, Russia, Moscow, ul. Akademika Volgina, 12

uprzn@ya.ru

Abstract.

The author analyzes the situations when investigators work among accomplices in crime. The author analyzes the problems of criminal law and legal regulation of investigative activities. The author considers acceptable, to his opinion, variants of behavior correlating with the signs of various types of accomplices of crime. Special attention is given to the concept of “participation” in various criminal groups as a feature of objective side of compositions of crimes. The author gives examples from the published judicial practice relating to the topic of the research. The author’s conclusions and suggestions can be used for the application of the criminal law and in investigative activities. The author uses the dialectical method of cognition, which allows reflecting the interrelation between theory and practice, and the methods of qualitative analysis of social and legal processes, content-analysis, documents study, expert assessments, surveys, etc. The scientific novelty of the study consists in complex intersectoral analysis of problems of legal regulation of investigation within criminal environment. The author makes a hypothesis that it is possible to consider actions, which are seemingly alike the behavior of a perpetrator of crime or an accomplice, as rightful. The author substantiates the possibility to act like a perpetrator, instigator, organizer or leader. 

Keywords: alleged complicity, enforceability , infliction of legitimate harm, operative experiment, operative penetration, investigative act, investigative activity, need, legitimate harm, criminal law

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0692.2017.5.24468

Article was received:

25-10-2017


Review date:

25-10-2017


Publish date:

11-11-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bilyk V. I., Petrasheva N. V. «Mnimoe souchastie» kak obstoyatel'stvo, isklyuchayushchee prestupnost' deyaniya dolzhnostnykh lits organov, osushchestvlyayushchikh operativno-rozysknuyu deyatel'nost' i lits, okazyvayushchikh im sodeistvie // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. 2016. № 1. S. 141–144.
2.
Vagin O. A. Konstitutsionnye problemy operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti (nauchnyi doklad) // Konstitutsionno-pravovye problemy operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti: sbornik materialov Vserossiiskogo kruglogo stola (3 noyabrya 2011 g.). SPb., 2012; SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3.
Glazkova L. V. Banditizm i prestupnoe soobshchestvo: voprosy razgranicheniya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2012. – 193 s.
4.
Dmitrenko A. P., Russkevich E. A. Sotsial'no-pravovaya obuslovlennost' reglamentatsii pravomernogo prichineniya vreda pri provedenii operativnogo vnedreniya // Problemy primeneniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva pri osushchestvlenii operativno-razysknoi deyatel'nosti: materialy Mezhvedomstvennogo kruglogo stola (Ryazan', 14 aprelya 2016 g.) / pod red. G. V. Ishchuka, E.N. Bilousa, A. V. Kovaleva, G. S. Shkabina. – Ryazan': Kontseptsiya, 2016. S. 50–56.
5.
Zheleznyakov Yu. G. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' sub''ektov operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti, sovershivshikh prestupleniya pri osushchestvlenii operativno-rozysknykh meropriyatii : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – Tambov, 2009. – 219 s.
6.
Lekar' A. G. Nauchnye osnovy organizatsii predotvrashcheniya prestuplenii organami vnutrennikh del. – M.: VSh MVD SSSR, 1969. – 102 s.
7.
Mel'nikova Yu. B., Ustinova T. S. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za banditizm. – M. : Izd-vo NII probl. ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka, 1995. – 32 s.
8.
Pavlichenko N. V. Pravovaya okhrana lits, okazyvayushchikh konfidentsial'noe so-deistvie organam, osushchestvlyayushchim operativno-razysknuyu deyatel'nost': monografiya. – Omsk: Omskii yuridicheskii institut, 2011. – 248 s.
9.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.01.1997 g. № 1 «O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za banditizm» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
10.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 10.06.2010 № 12 «O sudebnoi praktike rassmotreniya ugolovnykh del ob organizatsii prestupnogo soobshchestva (prestupnoi organizatsii) ili uchastii v nem (nei)» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
11.
Prigovor Gagarinskogo raionnogo suda g. Sevastopolya ot 15.03.2016 g. po ugolovnomu delu 1-149/2016. URL: https://gagarinskiy--sev.sudrf.ru/ (Data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2017).
12.
Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka / pod red. D. N. Ushakova. T. IV. M., 2000.
13.
Khlebushkin A. Organizatsiya deyatel'nosti terroristicheskoi organizatsii i uchastie v deyatel'nosti takoi organizatsii (st. 205.5 UK RF): ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika i kvalifikatsiya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 82-87.
14.
Shkabin G. S. Ugolovno-pravovaya norma (de lege ferenda) o prichinenii vreda pri provedenii operativno-razysknogo meropriyatiya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2017. № 4. S. 56–64