Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1938,   Articles in work: 312 Declined articles: 753 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Goal setting as a forming criterion of nongovernmental organization
Artemenkov Vladimir Konstantinovich

Senior Scientific Associate, Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation

123022, Russia, gorod federal'nogo znacheniya, g. Moscow, ul. 2-Ya zvenigorodskaya, 15

v.artemenkov@mail.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the nongovernmental organization as a system integrity, the forming factor of which becomes the goal setting. The author sets a task to analyze the content of the indicated category, as well as comes to a conclusion that it reveals in the following provisions: coordinated and mutually conditioned need of the individuals in joint nonprofit activity; legal means that contribute to exercising legal standing of the nongovernmental organization; methods of practical actions on connecting one with the other. It is proven that goal setting of the nongovernmental organization as a legal entity is specified depending on its organizational-legal form that regulates the structural elements (will of each of the incorporated citizen), as well as determines the key parameters of its functioning. Relevance of this study is substantiated by a special place of the nongovernmental organizations within the institutional basis of civil society; this, the understanding of their concept and organization of activity is the foundation for establishment of the consistent legal regulation of their status in practice. Theoretical importance consists in extension of the scientific representation on the nongovernmental organization as a collective subject of law, which is capable of operating within legal reality through the communicative and dialogical activeness of the volitional elements (people that comprise the volitional foundation of the nongovernmental organization).

Keywords: system integrity, private entity, legal entity, nongovernmental organization, goal, goal setting, element, self-sufficiency, legal means, need

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2018.1.24279

Article was received:

09-10-2017


Review date:

28-09-2017


Publish date:

12-02-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Suvorov N. S. Ob yuridicheskikh litsakh po rimskomu pravu. M.: Statut, 2000. – 299 s.
2.
Gervagen L. L. Razvitie ucheniya o yuridicheskom litse. SPb.: tipografiya I. N Skorokhodova,1888. – 91 s.
3.
Bratus' S. N. Yuridicheskie litsa v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Uchenye trudy: Ponyatie, vidy, gosudarstvennye yuridicheskie litsa. Vyp. 12. M.: Yurid. izd-vo MYu SSSR, 1947. – 364 s.
4.
Yampol'skaya Ts. A. Obshchestvennye organizatsii v SSSR. Nekotorye politicheskie i organizatsionnye aspekty. M.: Nauka, 1972. – 216 s.
5.
Filippova S. Yu. Instrumental'naya metodologiya tsivilisticheskogo issledovaniya: dis. ... d-ra. yurid. nauk. M., 2016. – 481 s.
6.
Iering R. Fon. Izbrannye trudy. Samara: Samarskaya gos. ekonomicheskaya akademiya, 2003. – 520 s.
7.
Spirkin A. Kurs marksistskoi filosofii. M.: Mysl', 1966 – 540 s.
8.
Turovskii M. B. Trud i myshlenie. M.: Vyssh. Shk., 1963. – 216 s.
9.
Borzenko A. V. Problema tseli v obshchestvennom razvitii. M.: Izd-vo VPSh i AON, 1963. – 79 s.
10.
Filosofskii slovar' / pod. red. M.M. Rozentalya, P.F. Yudina. M.: Politizdat, 1963. – 544 s.
11.
Marks K. i Engel's F. Sochineniya: v 39 t. 2-e izd. T. 8. M.: Politizdat, 1957. – 705 s.
12.
Kovalev V. I. Motivy povedeniya i deyatel'nost'. M.: Nauka, 1988. – 193 s.
13.
Galkin V. P. Problemy sovremennosti: teoreticheskie aspekty i osnovy ekologicheskoi problemy: tolkovatel' slov i idiomaticheskikh vyrazhenii: ucheb. posobie: v 3 ch. Ch. 2. Cheboksary, 1997. – 216 s.
14.
Manokhina N. V. Metasistema kak ob''ekt institutsional'nogo analiza // Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta ekonomiki i prava. 2014. № 1 (14). – S. 7-16.
15.
Soifer T. V. Nekommercheskoe yuridicheskoe litso kak forma realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na ob''edinenie // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2012. № 2. – S. 18-29.
16.
Norkin A. I. Pravovoi status obshchestvennykh ob''edinenii: problemy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1995. – 26 s.
17.
Mekhontseva D. M. O zakone tselesoobraznogo i optimal'nogo samoupravleniya i upravleniya. Krasnoyarsk, 1988. Dep. v INION RAN. № 35171.
18.
Arkhipov S. I. Sub''ekt prava. Teoreticheskoe issledovanie. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskii tsentr Press», 2004. – 469 s.
19.
Shukhov F. G. Obshchestvennye ob''edineniya kak institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva: teoretiko-i istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Belgorod, 2015. – 238 s.
20.
Sungurov A. Yu. Stanovlenie grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Sankt-Peterburge i Rossii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1993. № 3. S. 55-64.
21.
Avak'yan S. A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii: uchebnyi kurs. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. V 2-kh tomakh. T. I. M., 2007. – 719 s.
22.
Gavel' V. L. Tselepolaganie v strukture sotsial'noi deyatel'nosti cheloveka. Volgograd: Izd-vo Volgogr. gos. un-ta, 1998. – 280 s.
23.
Kodin V. N. Protsess poznaniya tseli: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kalinin, 1968. – 22 s.
24.
Kodin V. N. K probleme opredeleniya ponyatiya «tsel'» // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 8. Filosofiya. 1968, № 1. – S. 29-35.
25.
Aristotel'. Sochineniya. V 4-kh t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1981. – 613 s.
26.
Makarov M. G. Kategoriya «tsel'» v marksistskoi filosofii. M.: Nauka, 1977. – 190 s.
27.
Serova O. A. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie i prakticheskie problemy klassifikatsii yuridicheskikh lits sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava Rossii: dis. ... d-ra. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2011. – 433 s.