Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1918,   Articles in work: 297 Declined articles: 745 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The origins and the development of the real burden institution in Russian civil law
Tribushkova Kseniya

Post-graduate student, Assistant, the department of Civil Law, Kuban State University

350080, Russia, Krasnodar, Simferopolskaya Street 54, unit #126

kolechko777@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The article considers the development of one of the most controversial proprietary institutions – the real burden right. The author analyzes the formation of this concept in Russian law and considers particular provisions of the Patrimony charter and the Civil Code of the Russian Empire, containing information about this institution. The author pays special attention to the fact that real burden right doesn’t originate from Roman law, it is a result of German civil theory of the 19th – the 20th centuries. The author applies the historical method, the method of system and complex analysis, and the method of comparative jurisprudence. The author reveals and systematizes particular stages of development of real burden right in Russian law. The author formulates the periodization of development of this concept, consisting of five stages, and each of them is characterized by unique peculiarities. 

Keywords: legislative construct, limited proprietary right, personal debt, corvee, owner, divided property, periodization, evolution, real burden, property granting

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2017.5.22623

Article was received:

12-04-2017


Review date:

09-04-2017


Publish date:

14-04-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Babaev A.B. Sistema veshchnykh prav. M., 2006. S. 93-94.
2.
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie: Votchinnoe pravo. Proekt Vysochaishe uchrezhdennoi Redaktsionnoi komissii po sostavleniyu Grazhdanskogo ulozheniya (s ob''yasneniyami, izvlechennymi iz trudov Redaktsionnoi komissii). Kn. 3 / Sost.: Saatchian A.L. Pod red.: Tyutryumov I.M. Spb. 2008. S. 480-499.
3.
Emel'kina I. A. Veshchnye obremeneniya kak ogranichennye veshchnye prava na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. №3. 2009. S. 47.
4.
Emel'kina I.A. Sistema ogranichennykh veshchnykh prav na zemel'nyi uchastok. M., 2013.-399 s.
5.
Ioffe O.S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. M., 1967. S.394-398.
6.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya zakonodatel'stva o veshchnom prave. M., S. 130-133.
7.
Litovkin V.N., Sukhanov E.A., Chubarov V.V. Pravo sobstvennosti: Aktual'nye problemy. M., 2008. S. 30-32.
8.
Svod zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii. T. X. Ch. 1. SPb. 1900. S. 92-122.
9.
Pokrovskii I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1998. S. 208-212.
10.
Proekt Votchinnogo ustava s ob''yasnitel'noi k nemu zapiskoi. T.2. Spb. 1893. S. 196-199.
11.
«O vnesenii izmenenii v chasti pervuyu, vtoruyu, tret'yu i chetvertuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF, a takzhe v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty RF»: proekt Federal'nogo zakona ot 27.03.2012g. URL://http://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/12976.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2017g.)
12.
Sinaiskii V.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Vypusk 1. Kiev. 1917. S. 222.
13.
Freitag-Loringoven A.L. Material'noe pravo proekta Votchinnogo ustava. T. 1. Yur'ev. 1914. S. 197-240.
14.
Brehm W., Berger C. Sachenrecht. Tubingen. 2006. P. 332-333.
15.
Füller J. T. Eigenständiges Sachenrecht? Berlin. 2006. P. 74-75.
16.
Gablenz K.B. Grundstückswertermittlung für Praktiker: Bewertung nach ImmoWertV. 2014. P. 296.
17.
Nipperdey H.C. Das deutsche Privatrecht in der Mitte des Jahrhunderts: Festschrift für Heinrich Lehmann zum 80. Geburtstag. 1956. P. 352.
18.
Schwarz I.C. Das Institut der Reallasten auf deutschen Bauerngütern. 1827. P. 35.