Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1933,   Articles in work: 307 Declined articles: 746 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Actual Problems of Language Training in the "Zone of Proximal Development" of Schoolchildren
Chernov Dmitry Nikolaevich

PhD in Psychology

professor of the Department of General Psychology and Teaching atPigorov Russian National Research Medical University.

117997, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Ostrovityanova, 1, of. 1141

chernov_dima@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the language training in the "zone of proximal development" at school age. The aim of this work is analyze the possibility of using quasilanguage tools to create the training programs to Russian rules in terms of establishing of a subject-subject interaction between a teacher and a schoolchild. The origins of the use of artificial language construction for the purpose of updating the creative potential of the recipient in literature (based on the example of writings by Lewis Carroll, 'mind-bending' language of futurists, modern children's story writers) and demonstration of the significant potential of grammar to convey meaning of sentences (L. Scherba, N. Khomsky) were analyzed. It was shown that experimentation with the language rules is a natural stage of child language development (in particular, during the period of children's word creation). The analysis of the current diagnostic and training techniques that use artificial language material with the purpose of updating the language of creativity of the child was performed. In his research Chernov has come to the following conclusions. Language learning at school must actualize the creative potential of language acquisition. Effective teaching technique is the use of artificial words, rules of inflection which are similar to the Russian rules, and use of artificial sentences and texts in which the combination of quasiwords is similar to the rules of Russian grammar. The balance between spontaneous and reactive training in the use of such language material is possible when the interaction between a teacher and a schoolchild is like the cooperation in the "zone of proximal development" of the child.

Keywords: schoolchild, subject-subject interaction, speech, quasilanguage, quasiwords, zone of proximal development, grammar, language, linguistic creativity, language training

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2017.5.22410

Article was received:

24-03-2017


Review date:

24-03-2017


Publish date:

27-10-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bozhovich E. D. Zona blizhaishego razvitiya: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya ee diagnostiki v usloviyakh kosvennogo sotrudnichestva // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. 4. S. 9199.
2.
Bozhovich E. D. Smysl i bessmyslitsa: gde gran' mezhdu nimi? / Detskaya rech': psikholingvisticheskie issledovaniya. Sbornik statei / otv. red. T. N. Ushakova i N. V. Ufimtseva. M.: PER SE, 2001. S. 125147.
3.
Bozhovich E. D. Struktura, dinamika i mekhanizmy razvitiya yazykovoi kompetentsii shkol'nikov [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru. 2013. 5. URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2013/5/Bozhovich.phtmlhttp://psyedu.ru/journal/2013/5/Bozhovich.phtml data obrashcheniya: 20.03.2017).
4.
Kerroll L. Alisa v Strane chudes i v Zazerkal'e (sbornik). M.: Eksmo, 2016. 608 s.
5.
Janecek G. Zaum: The Transrational Poetry of Russian Futurism (2nd edition). San Diego: San Diego State University Press, 1996. 427 r.
6.
Uspenskii P. F. Lyudi v peizazhe Benedikta Livshitsa: literaturnaya traditsiya v futuristicheskom stikhotvorenii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 9. Filologiya. 2015. 2. S. 186197.
7.
Uspenskii L. Slovo o slovakh. Ty i tvoe imya. L.: Lenizdat, 1962. 635 s.
8.
Khomskii N. Sintaksicheskie struktury // Novoe v lingvistike. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1962. Vyp. II. S. 412527.
9.
Chukovskii K. I. Ot dvukh do pyati. M.: Gos. Izd-vo Detskoi Literatury Ministerstva Prosveshcheniya RSFSR, 1963. 404 s.
10.
Petrushevskaya L. S. Dikie zhivotnye skazki. Morskie pomoinye rasskazy. Pus'ki byatye. M.: Eksmo, 2003. 235 s.
11.
Berko J. The Child's Learning of English Morphology // Word. 1958. 14. P. 150177.
12.
Mitchell A. M., Brady S.A. Assessing Affix Knowledge Using Both Pseudoword and Real-Word Measures // Topics in Language Disorders. 2014. Vol. 34. 3. P. 210227.
13.
Ushakova T. N. Rech': istoki i printsipy razvitiya. M.: PER SE, 2004.
14.
Nelson K. Structure and Strategy in Learning Talk // Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1973. Vol. 38. 12. P. 1135.
15.
Dobrova G. R. Znachimost' vyyavleniya razlichii v imitatsii u detei dlya izucheniya variativnosti rechevogo ontogeneza // Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoi deyatel'nosti. 2013. 11. S. 4657.
16.
Frumkina R. M. Psikholingvistika: uchebnik dlya stud. uchrezhdenii vyssh. prof. obrazovaniya. M.: Akademiya, 2014. 336 s.
17.
Chernov D. N., Shal' L. G., Ernandes-Khimenes M. S. Osobennosti yazykovoi kompetentsii v norme i pri patologii v srednem shkol'nom vozraste / Aktual'nye problemy diagnostiki i razvitiya lichnosti v norme i pri patologii. Kollektivnaya monografiya. Saint-Louis, Missouri, USA: Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, 2016. S. 121130.
18.
Gridina T. A. Eksperimental'nyi resurs diagnostiki i treninga verbal'noi kreativnosti // Filologicheskii klass. 2014. 2(36). S. 3035.
19.
Chernov D. N. Vliyanie stilya detsko-roditel'skikh otnoshenii na obuchenie mladshikh shkol'nikov // Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2009. 1. C. 7484