Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2057,   Articles in work: 298 Declined articles: 785 
Library

Back to contents

Legal Studies
Reference:

Institution of the Judge Dissenting Opinion in Civil Legal Proceedings in the XVIIIth - XXth Centuries in Russia: From the Point of View of History and Law
Zolotova Ol'ga Igorevna

Assistant at the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of Kursk State University

305000, Russia, Kurskaya oblast', g. Kursk, ul. Radishcheva, 29, of. 606

olga17.10.1989@yandex.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The object of the research is social relations arising in the process of implementing the institution of the judge dissenting opinion before The Judiciary Reform of 1864 and until the end of the XIXth century. The subject of the research is the legal regulation of the institution of the judge dissenting opinion in Russia since XVIIIth till XIXth centuries. The author of the article examines how that legal phenomenon evolved during the aforesaid period and analyzes the practice of the Senate in appealing to dissenting opinions to court proceedings, archives, and all cases when court decisions were not ordinary. The methodological basis of the research involved such research methods as systems analysis, historical and legal analysis, dialectical, formal (logical) methods, complex approach, etc. The main contribution of the author to the studies of the institution of the judge dissenting opinion in civil legal proceedings is her attempt to study how the institution evolved from the point of view of causal and competitive models of civil legal proceedings. The author comes to the conclusion that the main features of this phenomenon, although naturally integrated into basic principles of the causal model, were set forth by The Senate in the course of the development of the institution of the judge dissenting opinion. 

Keywords: judge opinion, Senate, reformation of civil legal proceedings, court decision, Statute of Civil Procedure, justice, civil legal proceedings, causal model, competitive model, dissenting opinion of a judge

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.1.22102

Article was received:

28-02-2017


Review date:

26-02-2017


Publish date:

31-01-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Alyabyshev M.S.Osoboe mnenie sud'i-pora postavit' tochku // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2016. 2. S. 37-41.
2.
Basangov D.A. Yuridicheskaya priroda osobogo mneniya sud'i Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2006. 2. S. 24-34.
3.
Boldyreva N.N. Osoboe mnenie sud'i v grazhdanskom protsesse // Auditorium: elektronnyi elektronnyi nauchnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo. 2014. 2. S. 155-157.
4.
Bykov V.M., Manova N.S. O prave sud'i na osoboe mnenie: prodolzhenie temy // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2016. 3. S. 45-48.
5.
Vereshchagin A. Osobye mneniya v rossiiskikh sudakh // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie.2006. 4. S. 32.
6.
Gavrilov E. Ob osobom mnenii sud'i // Khozyaistvo i pravo. 2015. 4. S. 75-79.
7.
Gadzhiev G.A. Publikatsiya osobogo mneniya sud'i, ili Istoriya normy, kotoraya yavlyaetsya kamertonom sudebnoi reformy v Rossii // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika mass-media. 2005. 12. S. 76.
8.
Golovinskaya I.V. Osoboe mnenie sud'i: istoriya, geografiya, problemy i ikh reshenie // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. 5. S. 94-98.
9.
Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Orlovskoi oblasti. F. 714. D. 310.
10.
Dikarev I.S.Osoboe mnenie sud'i: vopros o pravovykh posledstviyakh// Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2014. 10. S. 56-59.
11.
Kononov A.L. Pravo na osoboe mnenie // Zakon. 2006. 11. S. 43-46.
12.
Krapivkina O.A. Sub''ekt osobogo mneniya konstitutsionnogo sud'i: skriptor ili lichnost'? // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2011. 6. S. 23-28.
13.
Tai Yu.V. Osoboe mnenie sud'i // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2016. 3. S. 25-51.
14.
Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva // Sudebnye ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 goda, s izlozheniem rassuzhdenii, na koikh oni osnovany. Ch. I. SPb.: Tip. II otd., 1867. 687 s.
15.
Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva / Sost. I.M. Tyutryumov. SPb., 1912. 1984 s.
16.
Uchrezhdenie dlya upravleniya gubernii // Rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo X-XX vekov. T. V. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1987. 432 s.