Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2054,   Articles in work: 299 Declined articles: 787 

Back to contents

Politics and Society

Factors of development of e-democracy in modern society
Manevskii Evgenii Vasil'evich

Post-graduate student, the department of Public Policy, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

125368, Russia, Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. 3-Mitinskii pereulok, 1-1, kv. 453





This article examines the development of democratic regimes in the conditions of implementation of the new information and communication technologies. The subject of this research is the factors and causes of emergence of the new phenomenon of e-democracy within the political space. The author refers to the existing in scientific environment theories that explain the transformation of modern regimes towards e-democracy. Special attention is given to the works of Pippa Norris, who made a theoretical and empirical contribution to the establishment of an original scientific model, as well as systematizes the theories of genesis of e-democracy. Other theories of foreign researchers are also considered in the course of this study. The author analyzes all concepts of the development of e-democracy, verified on the basis of empirical data received from Sweden. The conclusion is made on feasibility of the scientific paradigm of P. Norris. The author examines which of the paradigms – the theory of industrial society, technological determinism, democratic theory, or others – presents empirical significance  and affects the establishment and development of e-democracy in practice. The results may be valuable for further research on e-democracy, as this article covers and empirically tests all of the key theories of foreign scholars.

Keywords: teledemocracy, political communication, ICT, information and communication technologies, e-democracy, electronic democracy, democracy, cyber-democracy, Internet, new media



Article was received:


Review date:


Publish date:


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Norris P. Digital Divide?: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
Bell D. The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, Basic books, New York, 1973.
Medaglia R. Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government, Information Polity 12 - 4. 2007. 265-280.
Norris, Digital Divide?: chapter 5. p. 9.
P. van der Graft and J. Svensson, Explaining eDemocracy development: A quantitative empirical study, Information Polity 11 (2006), 123127.
P. van der Graft and J. Svensson, Explaining eDemocracy development: 130134.
Lipset S.M. Razmyshleniya o kapitalizme, sotsializme i demokratii // Predely vlasti. 1994. 1. S. 32.
Norris P. Digital Divide?: chapter 5. p. 10-15.
Best S.J., Krueger B.S. Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation, Political Behavior 27-11. 2005. 183-216.
Nam T. Whose e-democracy? The democratic divide in American electoral campaigns, Information Polity 16 (2011), 131150.
Christensen H.S. and Bengtsson A. The political competence of internet participants, Information, Communication & Society 14 (2011), 896916.
Norris P. Preaching to the converted? Party Politics 9 (2003), 2145.
Gustav L. Supply of and demand for e-democracy: A study of the Swedish case, Information Polity, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 217-232, 2013.
Viborg K., Andersen H.Z., Henriksen C. Secher and R.R. Medaglia, Costs of e-participation: The management chal-lenges, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 1 (2007), 2943.