Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Financial Law and Management
Reference:

Administrative Persuasion and Coercion as Methods of Public Administration
Safonenkov Pavel Nikolaevich

PhD in Law

Senior Lecturer at the Russian Customs Academy, Department of Customs Law

140000, Russia, Lyubertsy, Komsomol'skii prospekt, 4

pavelsafonenkov@mail.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0765.2017.2.18651

Review date:

12-04-2016


Review date:

12-04-2016


Publish date:

26-07-2017


Abstract.

The subject of research involves theoretical and legal basis of administrative persuasion and coercion as methods of state control undertaken under their dialectical unity. The author describes features and characteristics of each of these methods, offers his own definition of administrative persuasion and coercion, and says that a correct understanding of the methodology of public administration as a system of methods of organized activities performed by authorized bodies of public administration is essential for the resolution of problems of state management in general and administrative sanctions, in particular. The methodological basis for the article was formed by the current achievements of the theory of knowledge. In the course of his research Safonenkov has used theoretical, general philosophical methods (dialectic, systems approach, analysis, synthesis, observation), traditional legal methods (formal logical), and others. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author carries out a theoretical analysis of administrative methods of persuasion and coercion as methods of public administration in conjunction with each other. The author concludes that the methodology of public administration is a system of methods (principles, methods, techniques and tools) used by authorized bodies of public administration to organise their activities, including administrative persuasion and administrative coercion. Administrative persuasion is a system of methods that is carried out by authorized authorities and implies explanatory, educational, and incentive measures with the aim of making management entities to understand the need to comply with the legislation. The belief acts primarily on the consciousness of management entities. Administrative coercion is a way to influence the will of management entities involving the application of administrative penalties for past violations, and a variety of actions (measures) that are not related to administrative offences.

Keywords: jurisdiction, methods, characteristics, measures, persuasion, types, administrative coercion, prevention, suppression, punishment
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Sovetskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya, 2002. 559 s.
2.
Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Gl. red. Il'ichev L.F., Fedoseev P.N. i dr. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1983. 836 s.
3.
Bakhrakh D.N., Rossinskii B.V. Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnoe pravo. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Izd-vo NORMA, 2005. 800 s.
4.
Fialkovskaya I.D. Sushchnost' administrativnogo ubezhdeniya kak metoda gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2012, 1 (1). s.259-264.
5.
Kalinina L.E. Ubezhdenie kak metod gosudarstvennogo upravleniya ekonomikoi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. 11. s. 1170-1174.
6.
Tarasov I.T. Kratkii ocherk nauki administrativnogo prava. T. 1. Yaroslavl', 1888. s. 65.
7.
Bogdanov R. Uchenie ob administrativnom prinuzhdenii v trudakh uchenykh-politseistov (administrativistov) kontsa XIX-nachala XX vv. // Pravo i zhizn'. 2007. 111(6). s. 76. URL: http://www.law-n-life.ru/arch/l 1 lBogdanov.doc.
8.
Tarasov I.T. Lichnoe zaderzhanie kak politseiskaya mera bezopasnosti. Ch. 1. Kiev, 1875. 245 s.
9.
Tarasov I.T. Lektsii po politseiskomu (administrativnomu) pravu. T. 2. M., 1910. 269 s.
10.
Veremeenko I.I. O klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12 Pravo. 1970. 4. s. 73-79.
11.
Eropkin M.I. O klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya. Voprosy administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape. M., 1963. s. 60-69. Rozin L.M. Problemy klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya // Upravlenie i pravo. M., 1992. s. 184-185.
12.
Batychko V.T. Administrativnoe pravo. Konspekt lektsii. Lektsiya 7. Administrativnoe prinuzhdenie. Taganrog: TTI YuFU, 2008 g. 45 s. // http://www.aup.ru/books/m228/8_2.htm.
13.
Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskii A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Uchebnik. M.: Zertsalo-M, 2003. 608 s.
14.
Sapozhnikov A.I. Administrativno-pravovoi rezhim obshchestvennoi bezopasnosti: diss... k. yu. n.: M., 2006. 198 c.
15.
Askerova L.A. Pravovye ubezhdeniya: teoretiko-pravovoi aspekt. Avtoref. diss. k.yu.n.: Krasnodar, 2012. 34 s.
16.
Baitin M.I. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya vlast' (teoreticheskoe issledovanie): Diss d.yu.n. Saratov, 1972. s. 85-88.
17.
Popkova E.S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i ee sootnoshenie s inymi formami gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya: Diss. k.yu.n. M., 2001. 185 s.
18.
Korkin A.V. Institut administrativno-pravovogo prinuzhdeniya: mery, primenyaemye sotrudnikami militsii. Avtoref. diss k.yu.n. Chelyabinsk, 2004. 182 s.
19.
Zharenov A.P. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie v usloviyakh demokratizatsii obshchestva. Diss k.yu.n. M., 2006. 145 s.
20.
Kozhevnikov S.N. O prinuzhdenii v pravookhranitel'noi deyatel'nosti Sovetskogo gosudarstva: sbornik trudov Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. Sverdlovsk, 1973. Vyp. 22. Problemy primeneniya sovetskogo prava. s.120.
21.
Makareiko N.V. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie i nasilie: problema sootnosheniya. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii, 2014, 3 (27). s. 32-36.