Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Efremov A.A. Evolution of regulation of information or digital security in the documents of international organizations

Abstract: The object of this article is the modern trends in development of the international information or digital security. The author considers the report of the United Nations Group of Governmental Experts on achievements in the field of information and telecommunications in 2015, documents of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, as well as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Recommendation on digital security risk management for economic and social prosperity in 2015. The author conducts a comparative analysis of the information security models established in Russian legislation and advanced by Russia in the UN, SCO, OCSTO, and the concept of digital security risk management of OECD. Taking into account the integration processes in the Eurasian Economic Union, formation of a unified digital space of the Eurasian Economic Commission, as well as the desire the EAEU member states to enter the OECD, it is necessary to ensure coordination between the existing mechanisms of information security and the OECD concept on digital security risk management. On the basis of comparative analysis, the author has developed proposals pertaining to the possible changes in the Russian information security legislation.


Keywords:

United Nations, Collective Security Treaty Organization, international organisations, international law, information law, information security, integration, OECD, risk management, digital security


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Efremov A.A. Formirovanie edinogo tsifrovogo prostranstva Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza i obespechenie gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta v informatsionnoy sfere // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. ¹ 5. S. 18-21.
2. Cancún Ministerial Declaration on the Digital Economy // OECD URL: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/Digital-Economy-Ministerial-Declaration-2016.pdf
3. Ng J. International cybercrime, transnational evidence gathering and the challenges in Australia: finding the delicate balance //International Journal of Information and Communication Technology. 2016. Vol. 9. Issue 2. P. 177-198. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2016.078879
4. Baldoni R. Montanari L. Italian National Cyber Security Framework // Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management (SAM’ 2016). Athens, 2016. P. 168-174.
5. Yilmaz R., Yalman Y. A Comparative Analysis of University Information Systems within the Scope of the Information Security Risks // TEM Journal. 2016. Vol 5. No.2 P.180–191. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM52-10
6. OECD (2015), Digital Security Risk Management for Economic and Social Prosperity: OECD Recommendation and Companion Document, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015. 74 p.
7. Ufimskaya deklaratsiya glav gosudarstv-chlenov Shankhayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva 9-10 iyulya 2015 g. URL: http://sco-russia.ru/load/1013640909
8. Rekomendatsii po sblizheniyu i garmonizatsii natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva gosudarstv-chlenov ODKB v sfere obespecheniya informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoy bezopasnosti ot 27 noyabrya 2014 g. ¹ 7-6 // Parlamentskaya Assambleya Organizatsii Dogovora o kollektivnoy bezopasnosti. URL: http://www.paodkb.ru/upload/iblock/c07/rekomendatsii-po-sblizhen.-i-garmoniz.-natsion.-zak_va-gos._chlenov-odkb-v-sfere-obesp.-inf._kommunik.-bezop..pdf
9. Doklad Gruppy pravitel'stvennykh ekspertov po dostizheniyam v sfere informatizatsii i telekommunikatsiy v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti. A/70/174. Ofitsial'nyy sayt OON. URL: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/228/37/PDF/N1522837.pdf?OpenElement
10. Raznye modeli upravleniya internetom dopolnyayut drug druga // Koordinatsionnyy tsentr natsional'nogo domena seti Internet. URL https://cctld.ru/ru/press_center/news/news_detail.php?ID=9661
11. Hofmann J. Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: putting a fiction into practice // Journal of Cyber Policy. 2016. Vol. 1. Is. 1. P. 29-49. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2016.1158303
12. Efremov A. Analiz tekushchego sostoyaniya i perspektiv garmonizatsii rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva v oblasti nauchno-tekhnicheskoy i innovatsionnoy politiki s normami OESR // Informatsionnyy byulleten' "Novosti OESR". 2016. Vyp. 3(6). S. 6-10. URL: https://oecdcentre.hse.ru/nletter6.4
13. Ellison D., Venter H. An ontology for digital security and digital forensics investigative techniques (Conference Paper) // Proceedings of The 11th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ICCWS2016). Boston, 2016. P. 120-128.
14. Bello P. Security and international cooperation dominate today's cyber policy landscape // Journal of Cyber Policy, 2016. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 133-138. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2016.1166255
15. Minbaleev A.V. Doktrina informatsionnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya // Vestnik UrFO. Bezopasnost' v informatsionnoy sfere. 2016. ¹ 3. S. 62-66.