Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Toporina E.A., Ter-Gukasova T.A., Khominskaya V.M. Modern interpretation of classical art: the crisis of understanding?

Abstract: The subject of this research is the modern interpretation of classical art. The authors refer to the issues of understanding of the classical art, adequacy of conveying its meanings, experiencing the art and communication with it, value aspect of art works, as well as question of tradition and innovations in modern perception of the classical art. These problems are reveals through the reference to the practice of modern art – multiple movie and theatrical production of the classicism. The authors attempt to answer the question what is the modern interpretation of art, by analyzing the position of the classics in modern art and basing themselves on the works of philosophers, aestheticians, critics, literary scholars, and members of art community. Based on the analysis of “life” of the classicism in modern cultural-aesthetical field, the authors demonstrate the crisis of its understanding, rather than the attentive perusal realized by the contemporary means. Today, any re-interpretation of the composition can find (and finds) its justification and explanation. It is associated not only with the factors that should be viewed through the prism of development of the art, innovations, search of the new forms, but also more extensively – as a sustainable trend of confrontation of “non-classicism” with the traditional classical art. Such confrontation to a considerable degree causes the “crisis of understanding” of the classical artistic legacy and its interpretation in the modern art.


Keywords:

Value, Artistic legacy, Tradition, Dialogue, Theatre, Cinematography, Distortion, Understanding, Modern interpretation, Classical literature


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bykova Rimma. Unizheny dostoynye pokloneniya.-URL: http://www.mxat-teatr.ru/docs/tpl/doc_clean.asp?id=132&. Data obrashcheniya 23.01.2016.
2. Georgiy Sviridov. Muzyka kak sud'ba, M., 2002. S. 205.
3. Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroy v esteticheskoy deyatel'nosti // Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. 2-e izd. M., 1986. S. 77.
4. Lavrova Lyudmila. Mariya Gulegina: «Net zhizni bez lyubvi» // «Literaturnaya gazeta», ¹ 31 (6519) (29-07-2015). S. 21.
5. Morsin Aleksandr. Postanovshchik «Tangeyzera» Timofey Kulyabin: Kogda rezhisser vynuzhden ob'yasnyat' prokuroru svoy zamysel — eto chudovishchno. –URL: https://snob.ru/selected/entry/89397#comment_775647. Data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016.
6. Sitkovskiy Gleb. Shchenyach'i nezhnosti. – URL: http://www.smotr.ru/2004/2004_gitis_malchiky.htm. Data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016.
7. Khoruzhiy S.S. «Brat'ya Karamazovy v prizme isikhastskoy antropologii // Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul'tura. Al'manakh. 2009. ¹ 25. S. 39.
8. Samokhvalova V.I. Bezobraznoe: razmyshleniya i ego prirode, sushchnosti i meste v mire. M., 2010. S. 165.
9. Khominskaya V.M. Kul'turno-esteticheskiy faktor v sovremennom razvitii russkogo yazyka // Metody, ponyatiya i kommunikatsii v sovremennom esteticheskom diskurse. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, provedennoy v MGU 21-22 noyabrya, 2008 god. M., 2008. S. 108.
10. Bychkov V. K filosofii Leksikona //Leksikon nonklassiki. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskaya kul'tura XX veka / Pod red. V.V. Bychkova. M., 2003. S. 8.
11. Rid G. Znachenie iskusstva. (Fragmenty) // Sovremennaya zapadnoevropeyskaya i amerikanskaya estetika. M., 2002. 224 s.
12. Frank S.L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva. M., 1992. S. 11.
13. Levinson J. What is Aesthetic Pleasure? // The Pleasures of Aesthetics. Ithaca and London. 1996. P. 7.
14. Vel'flin G. Klassicheskoe iskusstvo. Vvedenie v ital'yanskoe Vozrozhdenie. M., 2004. 368 s.
15. Tsapesh V.V. Esteticheskaya sushchnost' teatral'nogo deystviya: obshchenie kak tvorchestvo. M., 1992. 121 s.
16. Dyufren M. Vklad estetiki v filosofiyu // Estetika i teoriya iskusstva XX veka. Khrestomatiya. M., 2007. S. 159.
17. Norshteyn Yu. Sneg na trave. – URL: http://theatre-teorema.ucoz.com/rejissura/Norshtein_U_Sneg_na_trave.doc.
18. Artyukh A.A. Virtual'naya real'nost' i problema ee reprezentatsii (animatsionnyy effekt) //Materialy pervoy vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 27-28 aprelya 2005 goda. Moskva, VGIK. M., 2006. 230 s.
19. Andreeva E.Yu. Postmodernizm: Iskusstvo vtoroy poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka. SPb., 2007. S. 14.