Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Starovoytov V.V. Kilborne B. Human Foibles and Psychoanalytic Technique: Freud, Ferenczi, and Gizella Palos (Translated by V. Starovoytova)

Abstract: This paper explores relations between human conundrums and psychoanalytic technique and theory through the relationship between Freud and Ferenczi. Rather than vilify (or lionize) either figure, Starovoytov seeks to see into their struggles and conflicts, and to draw from correspondence and writings a portrait of a relationship. The author describes not two dusty figures drawn from the closet of history but rather two live, flawed, and struggling human beings whose rational ideas about what they were doing could never keep step with their emotions. There is therefore much to be learned from their relationship: about transference and countertransference, about boundaries and friendship, about rivalry and despair, and about shame. The main method used by the author of the article is the thorough investigation of some excerpts from their correspondence and writings, and also the critical examination of several works of modern foreign authors, who study relations of Freud and Ferenczi. As a result of his investigation the author comes to the conclusion that Ferenczi’s concepts of active technique and of mutual analysis may themselves be seen at least in part a reaction to his shame and humiliation at the hands of Freud. The author hopes that today we can learn more from the Freud-Ferenczi relationship, and from the theories that grew out of it.


Keywords:

relationship, Ferenczi, Freud, trauma, idealization, shame, psychoanalytic history, human foibles, psychoanalytic technique, humiliation


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Eykhoff F.-V. Perechityvaya rabotu Freyda «Zametki o lyubvi v perenose» // Eroticheskiy i erotizirovannyy perenos. M.: KANON+, 2015. 303 s.
2. Bokanovski T. Shandor Ferentsi. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2013. 177 s.
3. Grot'yan M. Perepiska Z. Freyda // Entsiklopediya glubinnoy psikhologii. T. I. Zigmund Freyd. Zhizn'. Rabota. Nasledie. M.: MGM-Interna, 1988. 782 s.
4. Vikar G. The Budapest school of psychoanalysis // P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 60-76.
5. Rudnytsky P. Introduction // Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 1-24.
6. Rudnytsky P., Bokay A. @ Giampieri-Deutsch P. (Eds.) Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998.
7. Freud S. Standard Edition 25 vols. London: Hogarth Press, 1974.
8. Gedo J.O, Patria Mia // P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 77-88.
9. Freud S. Three essays on a theory of sexuality // Standard Edition. Vol. 7. London: Hogarth Press, 1905, P. 30-243.
10. Ferenczi, S. The correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi 1920-1933, vol. 3. E. Falzeder @ E. Brabant (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
11. Freud S. Interpretation of dreams // Standard Edition. Vol. 4-5. London: Hogarth Press, 1900.
12. Ferenczi, S. The correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi 1914-1919, vol. 2. E. Falzeder @E. Brabant (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
13. Nussbaum M. Comment on Freidman (Is there a special psychoanalytic love? // Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 53(2), 2005. P. 377-384.
14. Dupont J. Freud’s analysis of Ferenczi as revealed by their correspondence // International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 1994. P. 301-320.
15. Kilborne, B. Disappearing persons: Shame and appearance. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002.
16. Moreau-Ricaud M. The founding of the Budapest School // P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 41-59.
17. Kilborne B. Positivism and its vicissitudes: The role of faith in social sciences // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 1992. P. 352-370.
18. Kilborne B. When trauma strikes the soul; trauma, regression and psychic pain // American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59(4), 1999. P. 385-402.
19. Haynal A. In the shadow of a controversy: Freud and Ferenczi 1925-33 // International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 2005. P. 457-466.
20. Haynal A. (with Ernst Falzeder) Slaying the dragons of the past or cooking the hare in the present: A historical view on affects and in the psychoanalytic encounter // Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 13(4), 1993. P. 357-371.
21. Haynal A. Freud and his intellectual environment: The case of Sandor Ferenczi // Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ P. Giampieri-Deutsch (eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 25-40.
22. Haynal A. (with Ernst Falzeder) Healing through love? A unique dialogue in the history of psychoanalysis // Free Associations, 2, 1991. P. 1-20.
23. Freud S. Moses and monotheism // Standard Edition. Vol. 23. London: Hogarth, 1939. P. 7-140.
24. Freud S. Sandor Ferenczi // Standard Edition. Vol. 22. London: Hogarth, 1933. P. 216-253.
25. Freud S. Analysis terminable and interminable // Standard Edition. Vol. 23. London: Hogarth, 1937. P. 216-253.
26. Freud S. On Narcissism // Standard Edition. Vol. 14. London: Hogarth, 1914. P. 68-102.
27. Freud S. The theme of the three caskets // Standard Edition. Vol. 12. London: Hogarth, 1913. P. 89-302.
28. Freud S. Observations on transference love // Standard Edition. Vol. 12. London: Hogarth, 1915. P. 57-171.
29. Freud S. Types of onset of neurosis // Standard Edition. Vol. 12. London: Hogarth, 1912. P. 227-238.
30. Ferenczi, S. The Principle of relaxation and neocatharsis // International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 11, 1930. P. 428-443.
31. Ferenczi S. Clinical diary of Sandor Ferenczi, J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint @ N. Zarday Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988/1932.
32. Freyd Z. Konechnyy i beskonechnyy analiz // Psikhoanaliz v razvitii. Sbornik perevodov. Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1998. 169 s.
33. Blumenthal R. Hotel lag hints at illicit desire that Dr. Freud did not repress // The New York Times, 2006, December 24. P. 1A, 4A.
34. Ferenczi S. Thalassa: A theory of genitality, H.A.Bunker (Trans.). New York: Norton, 1924(1968).
35. Bokanowski, T.M. Sandor Ferenczi: Negative transference and transference depression // P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ P.Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 120-144.
36. Bergmann M.S. The tragic encounter between Freud and Ferenczi // P. Rudnytsky, A. Bokay @ P. Giampieri-Deutsch (Eds.), Ferenczi’s turn in psychoanalysis. New York: New York University Press, 1998. P. 145-154.
37. Rozen P. Freyd i ego posledovateli. SPb.: VEIP, 2005. 661 s.