Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Conflict Studies / nota bene
Reference:

Zaytsev A.V. The dialogue between the state and the civil society in public policy of modern Russia: between conflict and cooperation

Abstract: The subject of this research is the multitude of dialogue formats of dialogue interactions between the state and the civil society that span across the communication and dialogue area of public policy, from confrontational dialogue all the way towards cooperation, agreement, partnership, constructive discussion. In-between conflict and cooperation, there is a multitude of types (clusters) of dialogue, the understanding of which has high praxiological value. The approach studied in this work plays an important role in communication strategies of interaction between the state and the civil society concerning political conflict resolution. For the methodological basis, the author chose cluster differentiation and the typology of dialogue interaction between the state and the civil society in public politics. The scientific novelty of this approach to the dialogue between society and the state is that the author, for the first time in political science, attempts to view different variants (types, clusters) of their interaction. The dialogue between the state and the civil society is examined from the point of view of differentiation and potential transition between cluster types. This approach allows to manage political interactions, lowering the degree of conflictness and allowing to reach constructive interaction, cooperation and partnership.  


Keywords:

dialogue, cluster approach, communication, integration, conflict, deliberation, negotiation, cooperation, civil society, state


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii tsvetnym revolyutsiyam // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2014. ¹ 3. C. 332-363. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.12060.
2. Zaytsev A.V. Dialogicheskaya model' svyazey s obshchestvennost'yu Dzh. Gryuniga i sovremennost' // Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. Tom 19. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 84-88.
3. Zaytsev A.V. Dialogika Yurgena Khabrmasa: ponyatie i sushchnost'// Sotsiodinamika. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 75-98.
4. Zaytsev A.V.Dialogicheskaya model' svyazi s obshchestvennost'yu: M. Kent i M. Teylor // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii. ¹ 7 (27). Iyul' 2013. S.22.
5. Zaytsev A.V. Deliberativnaya demokratiya i obshchestvennyy dialog v Kitae // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. ¹ 4 (24). S. 147-151.
6. Zaytsev A.V. Deliberativnaya demokratiya v kontekste dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. ¹ 10 (106). S. 1231-1236.
7. Uolton D. Argumenty ad hominem: kharakter, rassuzhdenie i prakticheskoe obosnovanie // Sotsiologicheskoe obrazovanie. 2000. ¹ 3-4. S. 157-183.
8. Zaytsev A.V. Deliberativnaya demokratiya, dialog i ikh mesto v konstellyatsii diskursa publichnoy politiki // Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 15(158). Vyp. 27. Ser. «Istoriya. Politologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika». S. 147-153.
9. Zaytsev A.V. Dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva kak peregovornyy protsess: lingvo-politologicheskiy aspekt // Sotsiodinamika. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 34-47.
10. Zaytsev A.V. Interaktsiya vlasti i obshchestva kak peregovornyy protsess: lingvopolitologicheskiy aspekt// Sotsium i vlast'. 2013. ¹1. S. 66-70.
11. Zaytsev A.V. Politicheskie peregovory i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: skhodstvo i razlichie // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova. 2012. T. 18. ¹ 4. S. 142-145.
12. Zaytsev A.V. Dialog v institutsional'noy srede vzaimodeystviya gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: opyt v ES i sovremennaya Rossiya // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N.A. Nekrasova. 2012. T. 18. ¹ 2. S. 188-191.
13. Zaytsev A.V. Dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva: klasternyy podkhod // Politika, gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. ¹ 3(27). S. 5.
14. Zaytsev A.V. Publichnaya sfera kak pole dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. 2013. T. 19. ¹ 1. S. 203-206.
15. Skripnik K.D. Filosofiya. Logika. Dialog. Rostov n/D.: Izd-vo Rost. Un-ta. 1996. 146 s.
16. Plekhanova T.F. Tekst kak dialog. Monografiya. Mn.: MGLU. 2002. 253 s. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.psyinst.ru/library.php?part=article&id=1143. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.2014.
17. Ruzavin G.I. Logika i argumentatsiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. M.: Kul'tura i sport. YuNITI. 1997. S. 65.
18. Lane A. Is Dialogue the Key to Pandora’s Box? // Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY, 2005. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://eprints.qut.edu.au/10318/1/10318.pdf. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.2014.
19. Rodos V.B. Teoriya i praktika polemiki. Tomsk: Tomskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. V.V. Kuybysheva. 1989. 55 s.
20. Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S. G. Bocharov; Tekst podgot. G.S. Bernshteyn i L.V. Deryugina; Primech. S.S. Averintseva i S.G. Bocharova. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s.
21. Dzhokhadze D.V. Antichnyy dialog i dialektika // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2012. ¹ 2(66). S. 23–45.
22. Kumkin I.A. Publichnaya sfera kak predposylka formirovaniya grazhdanskogo soglasiya // Vestnik SevGTU.-Sevastopol': Izd-vo Sevastop. nats. tekhn. un-ta. 2006. Vyp. 78: Filosofiya. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.sevntu.com.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1788/1/78Fhilsofh.2006.159-169. Pdf. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.2014.
23. London S. Thinking Together: The Power of Deliberative Dialogue. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/dialogue.html. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.2014.
24. Yankelovich D. The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. 1999. New York: Simon and Schuster. 240 r.
25. Isaacs W. Dialogue and the art of thinking together. 1999. New York: Random House. 428 p.
26. Isaacs W. The Process and Potential of Dialogue in Social Change// Educational Technology. Vol. 36. ¹ 1. 1996. P. 20 – 30.
27. Bohm D. On Dialogue. In L. Nichol (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge. 1996.
28. Tannen D. The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue. Maryland. USA. 1998. 348 r.
29. Grays G.P. Logika i rechevoe obshchenie // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. XVI. M.: Progress, 1985. S. 217-237.
30. Kolokol'tseva T.N. Sovremennaya dialogicheskaya kommunikatsiya i problemy ee izucheniya // Rechevoe obshchenie: spetsializirovannyy vestnik / Pod red. A.P. Skovorodnikova. Vyp. 8-9. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://library.krasu.ru/ft/ft/_articles/0113885.pdf, svobodnyy. Zagl. s ekrana. Yaz. rus. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.20146.
31. Kolokol'tseva T.N. Spetsificheskie kommunikativnye edinitsy dialogicheskoy rechi. Volgogorad: Izd-vo Volgogradskogo universiteta. 2001. 260 s.
32. Arnett R. Dialogue as an «Enlarged Communicative Mentality»: Review, Assessment, and Ongoing Difference / P. Arnett , S. Grayson, S. McDowell // AQ UARTERLY REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH. 2008. Vol. 27, ¹ 3. ISSN 0360-3989. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://cscc.scu.edu/trends/v27/CRT_v27_n3_Sept_2008.pdf. R. 1-44. Data obrashcheniya 08.11.2016.
33. Pelipenko A.A. Chelovek i kul'tura kak sub'ekty dialoga // Tsivilizatsii / In-t vseobshch, istorii RAN. M.: Nauka, 1992. Vyp. 7: Dialog kul'tur i tsivilizatsiy / otv. red. A.O. Chubar'yan. 2006. S. 64-81.
34. Skripnik K.D. Filosofiya. Logika. Dialog. Rostov n/D.: Izd-vo Rost. Un-ta, 1996. 146 s.
35. Potseluev S.P. Dialog i paradialog kak formy diskursivnogo vzaimodeystviya v politicheskoy praktike kommunikativnogo obshchestva: avtoreferat dis. … doktora politicheskikh nauk: 23.00.01 Rostov-n/D, 2010. 46 s.