Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Kanunnikova N.G. Theoretical aspects of defining the set of elements of an administrative offence

Abstract: The article considers some issues of theoretical views on certain definitions of the set of elements of an administrative offence; demonstrates the characteristic of various approaches of scholars, dealing with the problems of administrative tort law. The topicality of this issue is conditioned by the importance of this legal institution, since it promotes the correct qualification of the deed and the effective application of administrative punishment, improves the legal culture of the population. The research object is social relations, regulating the administrative responsibility institution; the research subject is the theoretical approaches to the definition of the set of elements of an administrative offence as a basis for administrative responsibility. Based on the provisions of the general dialectical method, and using the system, structural-functional, analytical and comparative methods, the author offers her own interpretation of the definition of the set of elements of an administrative offence. The author suggests to understand the set of elements of an administrative offence as the set of legal features, which help characterize the deed, the circumstances, the damage, the person who had committed the offence, and the relation of this person to the committed deed. 


Keywords:

damage, administrative punishment, administrative jurisdiction, legislation, features, legal analysis, notion, composition, administrative law, administrative offence


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bocharov S.N., Zubach A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V., Sal'nikov M.G., Tyurin V.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
2. Dmitriev Yu.A., Evteeva A.A., Petrov S.M. Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov. M., 2005. S. 288.
3. Khatova Zh.M. Ponyatie sostava administrativnogo pravonarusheniya nuzhdaetsya v zakonodatel'nom zakreplenii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2007. ¹ 1. S. 24.
4. Administrativnoe pravo: Uchebnik / Pod red. L.L. Popova. M., 2005. S. 43.
5. Alekhin A.P., Karmolitskiy A.A., Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. M., 1996. S. 275.
6. Bocharov S.N. i dr. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya: Uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 12.
7. Kanunnikova N.G. Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s administrativnymi pravonarusheniyami // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 5-11.
8. Kanunnikova N.G. K voprosu zarozhdeniya instituta administrativnykh pravonarusheniy (prostupkov) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. ¹ 6. S. 22-24.
9. Kanunnikova N.G. Administrativnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast'. Uchebnik. Nal'chik, 2010. S. 380-413.
10. Averina E.A. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii v voprosakh i otvetakh: uch. posobie. M., 2005. S. 136.
11. Studenikina M.S. Sostav administrativnogo prostupka. M., 1968. S. 72.
12. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989. S. 42.