Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Vetushinskii A.S., Galanina E.V. The ontology of video games: objects, worlds, and environment

Abstract: ,Video game became an imperative part of the modern culture, which at the present stage finds its application in education, science and business, as well as training of cosmonauts, military officers, and medical personnel. We can also see video games exhibited in museums of modern art, and of course, they are studied in universities all over the world. In this sense, the authors attempt to cognize the philosophical aspect of video games, namely the ontology. Because without the description and analysis of the ontology of video games, it is impossible to understand their structure, as well as which ontological and gnoseological positions they are based upon. However, the authors believe that there is no single ontology, considering that there are different apprehensions of video games. Thus, the authors suggest referring to the three main ontologies of video games: the first one views them as the cultural phenomenon; the second – as the virtual words; and the thirds – as the mediator between a human (gamer and developer) and gaming platform, the interaction of which, as a matter of fact, makes the video games possible.


Keywords:

gamer, virtual worlds, digital culture, game studies, flat ontology, ontology of video games, computer games, video games, game developer, gaming platform


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Platon. Timei // Platon. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3. Ch. 1. SPb., 2007. S. 495-588.
2. Vetushinskii A. Osnovnye voprosy metafiziki videoigr // Mediafilosofiya Kh Komp'yuternye igry: strategii issledovaniya. SPb., 2004. S. 44-61.
3. Galanina E., Akchelov E. Virtual'nyi mir videoigry: kul'turfilosofskii analiz // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. ¹7. S. 97-111.
4. Bogost I. Alien Phenomenology, or What is Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis, 2012. 168 p.
5. Morton T. Realist Object: Objects, Ontology, Causality. Ann Arbor, 2013. 232 p.
6. Kharman G. Chetveroyakii ob''ekt: Metafizika veshchei posle Khaideggera. Perm', 2015. 152 s.
7. Bryant L. Onto-Cartography. An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh, 2014. 312 p.
8. Juul J. The Game, the Player,, the World: Looking for a Heart of Gameness // Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings. Utrecht, 2003. P. 30-45.
9. Bogost Ya. Bardak v videoigrakh // Logos. 2015. ¹1 (103). S. 79-99.
10. Yul I. Rasskazyvayut li igry istorii? Kratkaya zametka ob igrakh i narrativakh // Logos. 2015. ¹1 (103). S. 61-78.
11. Vetushinskii A. To Play Game Studies Press the START Button // Logos. 2015. ¹1 (103). S. 41-60.
12. Bogost I. How to Do Things with Video Games. Minneapolis, London, 2011. 180 p.
13. Mäyrä F. An Introduction to Game Studies: Games in Culture. London, 2008. 208 p.
14. Galanina E., Bikineeva A., Gulyaeva K. Sociocultural Competence Training in Higher Engineering Education: The Role of Gaming Simulation // Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015. Vol. 166. P. 339-343.
15. Salin A. K kritike proekta geimifikatsii // Logos. 2015. ¹1 (103). S. 100-129.
16. Sochineniya gnostikov v Berlinskom koptskom papiruse 8502. SPb., 2004. 448 s.
17. Zikermann G. Geimifikatsiya v biznese: kak probit'sya skvoz' shum i zavladet' vnimaniem sotrudnikov i klientov. M., 2014. 272 s.
18. Bykov E. Geimifikatsiya nauchnykh issledovanii // Logos. 2015. ¹1 (103). S. 180-213.
19. Verbakh K., Khanter D. Vovlekai i vlastvui. Igrovoe myshlenie na sluzhbe biznesa. M., 2015. 224 s.
20. Brown H. Videogames and Education. London, NY, 2015. 248 p.
21. Donovan T. Igrai! Istoriya videoigr. M., 2014. 648 s.