Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Zhemchugova O.A. Contrariety of the superhero image in the modern mass culture

Abstract: The object of this research is mass culture; the subject is the superheroic discourse that originated in comics – the key textual structures of mass culture. The author examines the ambivalence of the superhero characters, which on one side, represent hope for the rescue from external threats, and on the other side, a symbol of internal threat coming from those to whom society usually trusts. The contemporary superheroic discourse poses the questions of “otherness”, spiritual self-growth, as well as attainment of personal identity. The author detects the key controversies in the image of superheroes based on three directions: form, content, and development. It is determined that the look of a superhero symbolizes its superhuman status, and also places him outside the framework of society. The inner content of the superheroic image is filled with contradictions between his identities, as well as inevitably includes the antagonistic images. The development of superhero can never be complete – he is forced to always be at the stage of initiation, shifting between the divine and human identities.


Keywords:

superhero, narrative, comics, myth, textual structrures, mass culture, hero, identity, symbol, image


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Eco U. & Chilton N. The Myth of Superman // Diacritics. Vol. 2. ¹. 1 (Spring, 1972). P. 14–22.
2. Eco U. Innovation and Repetition: Between Modern and Post-Modern Aesthetics // Daedalus. Vol. 114. ¹ 4, The Moving Image (Fall, 1985) pp. 161–184.
3. Mehring M. The Screenplay. A Blend of Film Form and Content. L.: Focal Press, 1989. 236s.
4. Absalyamova L.F. Lingvokul'turologicheskie osnovy opisaniya superkontsepta «sverkhchelovek» v angliiskikh i bashkirskikh tekstakh. Diss. …kand. filol. nauk. Kazan', 2009. 197 s.
5. Yakushenkov S.N. Obraz chuzhogo – ot dekonstruktsii k konstruktsii // Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 242-249.
6. Shichanina Yu.V. Inomernost' v sovremennoi kul'ture: mnogoobrazie proyavlenii. Diss. … d-ra filos. nauk. SPb., 2006. 359 s.
7. Tsyrkun N.A. Supergeroi komiksov i obratnaya storona titanizma // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. 2014. ¹ 14(136). S. 191-199.
8. Tsyrkun N.A. Sotsial'no-istoricheskie i esteticheskie aspekty transformatsii kinokomiksa v sisteme amerikanskoi kul'tury. Diss. ... dokt. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 2014. 320 s.
9. Freidenberg O.M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M.: Labirint, 1997. 448 s.
10. Samoilova V.E. Mif o geroe i mif o supergeroe // Sborniki konferentsii NITs Sotsiosfera. 2012. ¹ 37. S. 86-89.
11. Mikhel'son O.K. Arkheologiya pop-kul'tury: novaya religioznost' i mifologicheskii kod v semanticheskom pole blokbastera // Religiovedenie. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 56–62.
12. Kempbell D. Geroi s tysyach'yu litsami. M.: Sofiya, 1997. 336 s.
13. Borisov S.I. Geroicheskii obraz v zhanrakh «boevik» i «fil'm-komiks» v nachale XXI veka v kinematografiyakh SShA i Rossii. Diss. … kand. iskusstvovedeniya. M., 2010. 193 s.
14. Belyaev D.A. Kontsept «supergeroi» kak lokal'nyi variant modeli sverkhcheloveka v aktual'nom prostranstve massovoi kul'tury // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2013. ¹ 2. S. 35-42.
15. Aliev R.T. Telo «supergeroya/ superzlodeya»: konstruirovanie obraza drugogo/chuzhogo v amerikanskikh komiksakh // Kaspiiskii region: politika, ekonomika, kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 2(39). S. 326-334.
16. Alekseev D.S., Bekisheva A.V. Obraz bogatyrya v epose Kievskoi Rusi i sovremennyi «supergeroi»: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. ¹ 6. S. 248-253.