Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Maksimov L.V. Knowledge and values in the structure of humanitarian disciplines

Abstract: The subject of this research is the equivocal – simultaneously value and cognitive – status of humanitarian disciplines. Despite the obvious presence of the value component in composition of these disciplines (notably, presence not only as the object of cognition, but also as the scholar’s own value position), the are usually qualified in the philosophical-methodological literature as the branches of knowledge, specific sciences (compared with other sciences). The article gives a different interpretation of the structure and functions of humanitarian disciplines. It is demonstrated that in this field have practically established the two interrelated and formally inseparable, but in essence, discordant types of intellectual activity: alongside the humanitarian sciences, which describe and explain the realities of human existence, it is also the value-normative doctrines, which suggest and rationally substantiate certain life orientations of the people. The methodological foundation lies in the non-cognitivist approach that stands for the beyond cognition specificity of the value-normative phenomena of consciousness, as well as their profound irreducibility to knowledge. This approach formed in the last several decades as the alternative to the traditional cognitivist paradigm that interprets human mentality in general as the area exclusively of the knowledge and cognition. The important practical result of discrediting of the cognitivist paradigm consists in the radical retargeting of the methodology of ethical upbringing: rejection of the traditional “educational” orientation (according to which, the values are retransmitting through the transfer of “knowledge” of good, duty, etc.; in other words, by means of moral edifications) in favor of the more efficient methods of psychological and socio-deterministic impact upon the souls of the educates.


Keywords:

Metaethics, Reductionism, Non-cognitivism, Cognitivism, Values, Knowledge, humaniora, humanities, Humanitarian sciences, Humanitarian disciplines


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Agatstsi E. Moral'noe izmerenie nauki i tekhniki. M.: Moskovskii filosofskii fond, 1998. 344 s.
2. Kalinichenko V.V. Nauki o dukhe // Sovremennaya zapadnaya filosofiya. Slovar'. M.: TON – Ostozh'e, 1998. 544 s.
3. Kasavin I.T. Znanie // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 2001. 692 s.
4. Maksimov L.V. Kognitivizm kak paradigma gumanitarno-filosofskoi mysli. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2003. 160 s.
5. Mikeshina JI.A. Filosofiya poznaniya: Polemicheskie glavy. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002. 622 s.
6. Mikeshina L.A. Epistemologiya tsennostei. M.: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2007. 439 s.
7. Mikhailov I.A. Rikkert // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 2001. 634 s.
8. Patnem Kh. Razum, istina i istoriya / Per. s angl. M.: Praksis, 2002. 296 s.
9. Stepin V.S. Nauka // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 2001. 634 s.
10. Filatov V.P. Obsuzhdaem stat'yu «Znanie» // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Nauchno-teoreticheskii zhurnal po obshchei metodologii nauki, teorii poznaniya i kognitivnym naukam. 2004. T. 1. ¹ 1. 256 s.
11. Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie / Per. s nem. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 380 s.
12. Khear R. Kak zhe reshat' moral'nye voprosy ratsional'no? // Moral' i ratsional'nost'. M.: IFRAN, 1995. 197 s.
13. Coulter J. Twenty-Five Theses against Cognitivism // Theory, Culture and Society. 2008. Vol. 25(2). P. 19-32.
14. Humanities // Wikipedia. (Autumn 2016 Edition). URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanities.
15. Svensson F. Does Non-Cognitivism Rest on a Mistake? // Utilitas. 2007. Vol. 19 (2). P. 184-200.
16. van Roojen M. Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Winter 2012 Edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/moral-cognitivism.
17. Watson R., Coulter J. The Debate over Cognitivism // Theory, Culture and Society. 2008. Vol. 25 (2). P. 1-17