Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Gladyshev V.I., Penner R.V. Culture of communication in the era of modern media

Abstract: The object of research is the phenomenon of communication in the context of media. The subject is the problem of harmonization of communication in terms of media-modernity. The authors begin their study with analizing the phenomenon of "digital natives" who violates the centuries-old tradition of generating and transmitting knowledge from elders to youth. Considering communication as the interaction, the authors identify the following features of it, which are the key in the context of the study: the nature of verbal communication; communicant's freedom and responsibility for the field of communication and his (her) role in it; communication as a necessary form of existence of homo sapiens; communication as a mutually beneficial interaction between people. Addressing to the phenomenon of media, the authors dwell on these effects in the media reality: the acceleration of information; simplification of information; "dissolution" of human in the information stream. The research methodology includes scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, generalization, abstraction. In addition, the procedure is carried out methodological conceptualization. A special contribution of the authors of the study is to identify communication requirements for the "new" reality to a human who is falling into a situation of communication. Among them should be marked: emotional reinforcement; selectivity in communication; overcoming narcissism and conformism; tolerance in communication; communicative activity and the attractiveness of the subject of communication; competence in communication.


Keywords:

compensatory communication, digital immigrants, digital aborigens, media-modernity, media, interaction, communication, culture of communication, media effects, information field


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants // On the Horizon. 2001. T. 9, ¹ 5
2. Shafranskaya K. D. Psikhologicheskie trudnosti obshcheniya lits s kosmeticheskimi defektami // Psikhologiya mezhlichnostnogo poznaniya. M.: Pedagogika, 1981. S. 212-221.
3. Khaydegger M. Otreshennost' // Razgovor na proselochnoy doroge. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991. 192 s.
4. Frank S. L. Nepostizhimoe. Ontologicheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu religii // Sochineniya. M.: Pravda, 1990. S. 370.
5. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. M.: Progress, 1990. 266 c.
6. Fromm E. Begstvo ot svobody. M.: Progress, 1989. 256 s.
7. Khaydegger, M. Veshch' [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000286/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2016)
8. Rozanov V. V. Opavshie list'ya. Korob pervyy // Uedinennoe. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 387 s.
9. Sokolova E. T. Samosoznanie i samootsenka pri anomaliyakh lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1989. 210 s.
10. Penner R. V. De re ad absurdum: problema identichnosti cheloveka v fenomene kospleya (onto-antropologicheskiy analiz) // Sotsium i vlast'. 2016. ¹ 3. S. 117-123.
11. Panferov V. N. O roli vneshnosti v regulyatsii otnosheniy // Chelovek i obshchestvo. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1968. Vyp. III. S. 235-240.
12. Moskovskogo shkol'nika zavalili laykami vo «VKontakte» posle posta ego mamy [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2016/04/19/like/ (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2016)
13. Mamardashvili M. K. Filosofiya i lichnost' // Vystuplenie na Metodologicheskom seminare sektora filosofskikh problem psikhologii Instituta psikhologii RAN 3 marta 1977 goda. ChELOVEK. M., 1994. ¹ 5. S. 5-19.
14. Lektorskiy V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2001. S. 19-31.
15. Lebedinskaya V. V. Emotsional'nye narusheniya v detskom vozraste i ikh korrektsiya. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1990. S. 54-55.
16. Zorkaya N. M. Unikal'noe i tirazhirovannoe. M.: Iskusstvo, 1981. 167 s.
17. Kamper D. Telo. Nasilie. Bol' : Sbornik statey. SPb.: Izd-vo Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 2010. 174 s.
18. Korolenko Ts. P. Sem' putey k katastrofe: Destruktivnoe povedenie v sovremennom mire // Ts. P. Korolenko, T. A. Donskikh. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. S. 5-17.
19. Dydrov, A. A. Chelovek bessmertnyy: religioznaya fiktsiya ili budushchee nauki? // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. ¹ 391. S. 76-79.
20. Gozman L. Ya. Psikhologiya emotsional'nykh otnosheniy. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1987. 120 s.
21. Grednovskaya E. V. Problema podlinnosti sushchestvovaniya cheloveka v diskursakh ekzistentsializma i postmodernizma // E. V. Grednovskaya, R. V. Penner. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. T. 15. ¹ 3. S. 56-60.
22. Aristotel'. Bol'shaya etika // Soch. V 4 t. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1984. 830 s.
23. Borodin P. A. K voprosu ob osnovnykh tsennostyakh v kul'ture obshcheniya // Al'manakh sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2012. ¹ 4. S. 37-40.
24. Buber M. Ya i Ty // Dva obraza very. M.: Respublika, 1995. 464 s. S. 16-92
25. Gladyshev V. I. Kompensatornoe obshchenie cheloveka s prirodoy kak sposob smyagcheniya odinochestva // V. I. Gladyshev, A. V. Kuznetsova. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. ¹ 17 (346). S. 65-75.