Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Salkazanov A.E. Criminal responsibility for tax violation in the CIS countries

Abstract: The subject of this research is the criminal law norms that regulate the responsibility for tax violations in the CIS countries. The author explores the objective and subjective elements of these violations, its qualifications, as well as the questions of exemption from criminal responsibility for these offences. A peculiar attention is given to the questions of legislative regulation of the norms on criminal evasion from taxes. The scientific novelty of this research consists in the complex research of the norms on criminal tax evasion, as well as determination of the legislative gaps and formulation of the ways to fix them. Among the main conclusions are the author’s highlights of the positive and negative aspects of the legal regulation of criminal responsibility for tax violations in the CIS countries.


Keywords:

Model Criminal Code of the CIS, Elements of crime, Criminal evasion, Taxation, Foreign countries, Criminal Code, CIS countries, Criminal responsibility, Tax evasion, Taxes


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Dolotov R.O. Kvaziugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskikh lits za posobnichestvo v nalogovykh prestupleniyakh // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy XII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (29-30 yanvarya 2015 g.). – Moskva: RG-Press, 2015. S. 159-162.
2. Naukovo-praktichniy komentar Krim³nal'nogo kodeksu Ukra¿ni.-4-te vid., pererobl. ta dopovn. / Za red. M. ². Mel'nika, M. ². Khavronyuka.-K.: Yuridichna dumka, 2007. S. 601.
3. O.G. Karpovich Protivodeystvie nalogovym prestupleniyam po zakonodatel'stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Aktual'nye voprosy // SPS «Konsul'tant plyus».
4. Tegetaeva O.R. Optimizatsiya nalogooblozheniya VS uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 10. - C. 889 - 893. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.10.12707.
5. Bayteryakov R.E. O vozmozhnosti vvedeniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskikh lits (na primere krupneyshikh nalogoplatel'shchikov) // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 231 - 234. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15778.
6. Khachatryan A.K. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2014. - 9. - C. 846 - 855. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.9.13059.
7. Salkazanov A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsiy. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2013. - 11. - C. 852 - 859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
8. Akopdzhanova M.O. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana poryadka uplaty sborov v byudzhet: novoe v zakonodatel'stve // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. - 2015. - 3. - C. 224 - 229. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2015.3.14463.