Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2087,   Articles in work: 306 Declined articles: 832 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Mayorov R.N. Political theory in the United States as the space for formation of national ideology

Published in journal "Trends and management", 2016-2 in rubric "World order", pages 145-152.

Resume: This article explores the peculiarities and internal contradictions of the U. S. political theory, as well as its ability to form national ideology and feed the national idea of American people at the present stage. The U. S. political theory was initially developing as a special chapter of the American political science, called to establish both, the effectiveness of American political science, as well as the American political system. The author determines and formulates the systemic limitations imposed by the imitation of the American political theory by the natural science disciplines and following the idea of “American exclusivity”. Declaring the freedom from values in the research, the U. S. political theory is in fact closely tied to the values of liberalism. This unique dogmatism in combination with rejection of criticism makes the American political theory similar to the Communist teachings, and resembles its ideology. It is also justified by the fact that the American Political Science Association does not really tolerate dissent in its ranks, as substantiated by the actual American political scientists. In the end, the contradictions accumulated in the area of political theory impede the truly objective political research and development of political science in the United States.

Keywords: Security, Values, Political history, State, Diplomacy, Ideology, Political theory, United States, Society, Policy

DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2016.2.13058

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Spiridonov V.V. Finansovo-ekonomicheskie prichiny politicheskogo krizisa na Ukraine. Vzglyad cherez prizmu analiza bankovskoy sistemy strany // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11740.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Geopoliticheskiy klientelizm v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: strategiya i taktika Zapada. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
Lasariya A.O. Osobennosti etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov na postsovetskom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 75 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.1.13507.
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Ideologicheskaya baza separatizma v sisteme koordinat sovremennoy mirovoy politiki // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1339 - 1352. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.11.12959.
Manoylo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoy politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. ¹2. S. 71-82.
Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. ¹6. S. 49-56.
Bocharnikov I.V. O gosudarstvennoy ideologii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-1.-C. 22-27. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.01.3.
Pavlov A.V., Leo Shtraus: iskusstvo pisat' i iskusstvo chitat' // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2012. T. 3. ¹ 3. S. 4-11.
Pavlov A.V., Pragmatichnye nasledniki politicheskoy filosofii Leo Shtrausa // Istoriya filosofii. 2008. ¹ 13. S. 98-109;
Frisch, M.J., Leo Strauss and the American Regime // Publius, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Spring, 1987), pp. 1-5; Smith S.B., Leo Strauss's Platonic Liberalism // Political Theory Vol. 28, No. 6 (Dec., 2000), pp. 787-809;
Barber, B.R. The Politics of Political Science: “Value-free” Theory and the Wolin–Strauss Dust-Up of 1963 // American Political Science Review, November 2006, Vol. 100, No. 4, 539-545;
Altman, W.H.F., The Hindenburg Line of the Strauss Wars // Philosophy of the Social Sciences March 2010 Vol. 40, ¹ 1, pp. 118-153;
Chacon, R. Reading Strauss from the Start : On the Heideggerian Origins of 'Political Philosophy' // European Journal of Political Theory 2010 Vol. 9, 287-307
Bernshteyn E. Izdatel'stvo Burevestnik, Odessa, 1906 g. Str. 27-28
Posusney, M.P. Democracy versus Diversity – a False Dichotomy // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 250-259;
Almond G. Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science // PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Autumn, 1988), p. 840;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p. 28;
Huntington S.P., One Soup at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform // American Political Science Review, vol. 82, ¹ 2, March 1988 pp. 6-7;
Anderson L., Items and Issues, Social Science Research Council, Vol. I, ¹ III-IV, Fall 2000, p. 8
Barrow, C.W. The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science // New political science, Vol. 30, Issue 2, 2008.
The Idea // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 9;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 212;
D. Ross, The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.76;
Ross D. The origins of American Social Science, Cambridge, 1991, p.48;
Haddow A. Political science in American colleges and universities 1636-1900, Octagon Books, N.Y., 1969, p. 236;
Sailsbury, R., Current Criticism of APSA is Nothing New // PS: Political Science and Politics, 34 (December 2001) 767-772;
Warren D.T., Will the real perestroikniks please stand up? // Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science Edited by Kristen Renwick Monroe, Yale University Press, 2005, p. 219;
Easton, D. The New Revolution In Political Science // American Political Science Review, December 1969;

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard