Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Dydrov A.A.  Post-nonclassical science in light of human adaptation to the future

Abstract: The subject of this research is the modern post-nonclassical science. The author determines some signs of the post-nonclassical paradigm (interdisciplinarity, domination of methodological anarchism, combinatorial character, oversaturation, performativity). The peculiar feature of the post-nonclassical science is that it dedicates great attention to the future. Today, the amount of projects, models, and scenarios of the future is rapidly increasing; many of them differ drastically. The increase of projects and models of the future is associated with the pragmatic orientation of the post-nonclassical science: the criterion of scientificity implies not only the concordance between the scientific research and the truth, but the leading criterion includes the practical value of the constructed model. The author’s main contribution into this work is the determination of the specific signs of the post-nonclassical science, which are yet to be thoroughly discovered in the philosophy of science. The attention is given to the introduction into the scientific discourse of the notion futuropluralism. It designates the multiplicity of projects, models, and scenarios of the future. The author evaluates the ambiguous influence of futuropluralism upon the human life. One of the means of harmonization of human being and culture is education, which encompasses the resources for human adaptation to the rapidly changing world.


Keywords:

Education, Futuropluralism, Performance, Text, Palimpsest, Culture, Pluralism, Rhizome, Science, Future


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bart, R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 413-423
2. Bart, R. Smert' avtora // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 384-391
3. Bart, R. Tekstovoy analiz odnoy novelly Edgara Po // Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress, 1989. 616 s. S. 423-461
4. Bostrom, N. FAQ po transgumanizmu [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://transhumanism-russia.ru/content/view/6/144/#currents (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
5. Budanov, V. G. Postneklassicheskie osnovy upravleniya budushchim // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Seriya: Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. 2014. T. 1. ¹ 1 (1). S. 72-78.
6. Delez, Zh. Lukretsiy i simulyakr // Logika smysla. Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 1998. 480 s.
7. Delez, Zh. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010. 895 s.
8. Stolyarov, A. M. Osvobozhdennyy Edem. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2008. 416 s.
9. Toffler E. Revolyutsionnoe bogatstvo. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA, 2008. 569 s.
10. Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2002. 557 s.
11. Feyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL', 2007. 413 s.
12. Fuko, M. Nitsshe, Freyd, Marks [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/nfm.txt (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016)
13. Khantigton, S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy? [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ecocrisis.wordpress.com/miscellanea/clash-civilization/ (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2016