Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philology: scientific researches
Reference:

Gorbunova N.N. To the issue of a transdisciplinary character of some terminological systems

Abstract: The article is devoted to the issue of a transdisciplinary character of some terminological systems drawing on the example of the sphere of management. In the framework of one field of knowledge a terminological unit has a standard set of constitutive features, such as monosemanticity, systemacy, etc. Due to the fact that nowadays some terminological systems go beyond a certain field of knowledge, some lexical corpora acquire the features of over-disciplinary terminological systems, that is their lexical units are used in several special spheres. The article attempts to give a complex cognitive-philosophical foundation of the above-mentioned process. A complex method of research is applied in the work, that comprises the contextual type of analysis, method of continuous selection of terminological units, as well as general scientific methods: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction. The first part of the article considers the theoretical-philosophical foundation of the transdisciplinary character of terminological systems. The second part of the article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of transdisciplinarity as an essential characteristic feature of some terminological systems in the light of cognitive terminology study drawing on the example management terminological system. The author comes to the conclusion that irrespective of a distribution of the term and its context the constitutive features of a terminological unit remain immutable. In turn the transdisciplinary character of terminological units is possible due to a complex mutual multidirectional extrapolation of terminological units from one field to another without a shift of the corresponding cognitive structures and, as a result, the changes of the semantic content of this lexical unit. A further study of the phenomenon of transdisciplinarity drawing on the material of different terminological systems is of special scientific interest and seems very perspective.


Keywords:

lexical unit, cognitive structure, transdisciplinarity, terminological unit, terminology, terminological system, special lexis, field of knowledge, management, cognitive linguistics


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Gorbunova N.N. Sovremennaya angloyazychnaya terminosistema sfery menedzhmenta: strukturno-semanticheskaya i kognitivno-freimovaya kharakterizatsiya: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Pyatigorsk, 2014. 29 s. (str. 5)
2. Alimuradov O.A., Latu M.N., Razduev A.V. Osobennosti struktury i funktsionirovaniya otraslevykh terminosistem (na primere terminosistemy nanotekhnologii): monografiya. 2-e izd. Pyatigorsk: SNEG, 2012. 128 s. (str. 32-35)
3. Alimuradov O.A., Latu M.N. Dinamicheskie protsessy v terminologicheskikh sistemakh (na materiale sovremennykh angloyazychnykh terminosistem) // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2012. ¹ 14. S. 250-259.
4. Alimuradov O.A., Grigor'eva N.V. Interaktsional'naya priroda diskursa i nekotorye kriterii ego osmyslennosti // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 31-37.
5. Shelov S.D. Novaya paradigma terminovedeniya: nekotorye perspektivy // Terminologiya i znanie: mat-ly I Mezhdunar. simpoziuma. M.: In-t rus.yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova RAN, 2009. S. 207-211.
6. Fel'de O.V. Yazyki dlya spetsial'nykh tselei v istoriko-lingvisticheskom aspekte // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. ¹ 10. S. 50-55. (str. 52)
7. Alekseeva L.M. O tendentsiyakh razvitiya sovremennogo terminovedeniya / L.M. Alekseeva, S.L. Mishlanova // Aktual'nye problemy lingvistiki i terminovedeniya: Mezhdunar. sb. nauch. tr., posvyashch. yubileyu prof. Z.I. Komarovoi. Ekaterinburg, 2007. S. 8-11. (str. 10)
8. Massalina I.P. Diskursivnye markery v angliiskom yazyke voenno-morskogo dela / I.P. Massalina, V.F. Novodranova. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo FGOU VPO «KGTU», 2009. 278 s. (str. 18)
9. Volodina M.N. Kognitivno-informatsionnaya priroda termina (na materiale terminologii sredstv massovoi informatsii). M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2000. 181 s. (str. 30)
10. Klester A.M. Kognitivnyi podkhod k izucheniyu mezhotraslevoi terminosistemy // Omskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2012. ¹ 4 (111). S. 171-174. (str. 173)
11. Kravchenko A.V. Znak, znachenie, znanie. Ocherk kognitivnoi filosofii yazyka. Irkutsk, 2001. 260 s.
12. Golovanova E.I. Vvedenie v kognitivnoe terminovedenie: ucheb.posobie. M.: FLINTA: Nauka, 2011. 224 s. (str. 58)
13. Kubryakova E.S. Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. M., 1997. 326 s.
14. Manerko L.A. Istoki i osnovaniya kognitivno-kommunikativnogo terminovedeniya // Leksikologiya. Terminovedenie. Stilistika: sb. nauch. tr., posvyashch. yubileyu V.M. Leichika. M.: Ryazan', 2003. S. 120-126. (str. 120)
15. Shilkov Yu.M. Yazyk i poznanie: Kognitivnye aspekty. Spb.: Vladimir Dal', 2013. 542 s. (str. 67)
16. Gorbunov A.P. Kak upravlyat' mirom, pozitivno preobrazovyvaya ego: kreatsionno-evolyutsionnaya transparadigmatika i transparametrika, transkonsotsiotika i transsinergetikaedinosmyslovogo miroustroistva // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 9-20.
17. Kiyashchenko L.P. Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti / L.P. Kiyashchenko, V.I. Moiseev; Ros.akad. nauk, In-t filosofii. M.: IFRAN, 2009. 205 s. (str. 17)
18. Knyazeva E.N. Transdistsiplinarnye kognitivnye strategii v nauke budushchego // Vyzov poznaniyu. M., 2004. S. 29-49. (str. 35)
19. Chernikova I.V. Transdistsiplinarnye metodologii i tekhnologii sovremennoi nauki // Voprosy filosofii. 2015. ¹ 4. S. 26-35. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1139&Itemid=52 (data obrashcheniya: 10.09.2015).
20. Gusev S.S. Filosofiya nauki: integratsiya znanii // Mysl': Zhurnal Peterburgskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2008. T. 7. ¹ 1. S. 84-97. (str. 96)
21. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4-kh t. / In-t filosofii RAN; Nats. obshchestv.-nauch. fond; preds. nauchno-red. soveta V.S. Stepin. 2-e izd., ispr. i dopol. M.: Mysl', 2010. URL: http://iph.ras.ru/elib/3281.html.
22. Chernyshenko A.G., Alimuradov O.A. Prikladnayaterminosistema s funktsional'noi tochki zreniya: terminologicheskii komponent angloyazychnogo diskursa mediatsii // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. ¹ 2. S. 408-415.
23. Sachkov Yu.V. Fundamental'noe i prikladnoe v razvivayushchemsya nauchnom poznanii // Vestnik Rossiiskogo Filosofskogo Obshchestva. 2012. ¹2. S. 83-89.
24. Lazarev V.V. K teorii obydennogo/kognitivnogo poznaniya (ot Kopernika k Ptolemeyu) // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Pyatigorsk, 1999. ¹ 2. S. 25-34. (str. 25-27)
25. Turbina I.S. Obydennoe znanie v kontekste povsednevnosti i nauki // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2007. ¹ 6. S. 31-33. (str. 32)
26. Perevozova Yu.E. Reprezentatsiya nauchnogo i obydennogo znaniya v yazykovykh edinitsakh, oboznachayushchikh khimicheskie veshchestva: dis… kand. filol. nauk. Tambov, 2004. 189 s. (str. 22)
27. Bagiyan A.Yu. Determinologizatsiya angliiskoi tekhnicheskoi terminologii v nauchno-populyarnom diskurse: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Pyatigorsk, 2014. 173 s. (str. 65)
28. Kanke V.A. Filosofiya. Istoricheskii i sistematicheskii kurs: uchebnik dlya vuzov. Izd. 4-e, pererab. i dop. M: Izdatel'sko-knigotorgovyi dom «Logos», 2002. 344 s.
29. Kokhanovskii V.P., Zolotukhina E.V., Leshkevich T.G., Fatkhi T.B. Filosofiya dlya aspirantov: Uchebnoe posobie. Izd. 2-e-Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2003. 448 s. (Seriya «Vysshee obrazovanie».)
30. Kratkii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' filosofskikh terminov/ P.V. Kikel', E. M. Soroko. Minsk: BGPU, 2006. 266 s.
31. Filin S.P. Kontseptsii sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. Konspekt lektsii. M.: Eksmo, 2007. 160 s.
32. Razduev A.V., Khakieva Z.U. Osnovnye individual'nye (variativnye) kharakteristiki angloyazychnykh sistem stroitel'noi i nanotekhnologicheskoi terminologii // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty izucheniya rechevoi deyatel'nosti. 2012. ¹ 7. S. 191-206.
33. Razduev A.V. Sovremennyi angliiskii pod''yazyk nanotekhnologii: strukturno-semanticheskaya, kognitivno-freimovaya i leksikograficheskaya modeli: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.04. Pyatigorsk, 2013. 32 s.
34. Latu M.N. Kompleksnaya kharakteristika sovremennoi angloyazychnoi voenno-istoricheskoi terminologii: freimovo-semanticheskii podkhod // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2009. ¹ 1. S. 120-123.
35. Latu M.N., Razduev A.V. Terminovedenie: chastnye voprosy razvivayushchikhsya terminologii: uchebnoe posobie k lektsionnomu kursu «Obshchie i prikladnye aspekty terminovedeniya». Pyatigorsk, 2011. 132 s.
36. Latu M.N. Osnovnye kharakteristiki termina v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: etalon i dinamika (na materiale sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka voenno-istoricheskoi terminologii) // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. – 2009. ¹ 2. S. 93-96.
37. Abchuk V.A. Menedzhment: uchebnik. Seriya: Vysshaya shkola. SPb.: Soyuz, 2002. 463 s. (str. 16)
38. Alimuradov O.A. Kontsept i lingvisticheskaya semantika. Znachenie, smysl, kontsept i intentsional'nost': sistema korrelyatsii. Saarbruken: LAP LAMBERT, 2011. 316 s.
39. Alimuradov O.A. Funktsional'naya priroda leksicheskogo znacheniya // Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2004. ¹ 4. S. 77-82.
40. Shchuplenkov N.O. Kognitivno-diskursivnyi podkhod k opisaniyu terminov Russkogo Zarubezh'ya (1920-1930-kh gg.) // Chelovek i kul'tura.-2014.-2.-C. 67-96. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.2.12030. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_12030.html