Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Conflict Studies / nota bene
Reference:

Khauer-Tyukarkina O.M. The role of "soft power" under the global economic crisis (on the example of the EU)

Abstract: The article examines current status of soft power usage in the European Union and provides the analysis of the potential of using soft power as a means to overcome the negative consequences of the global economic crisis. The goal of the article is to determine the role of soft power in the European union in overcoming the negative consequences of the financial and economic crisis. The object of study is soft power in the European Union. The subject of research is the forms, methods and tools of soft power in the EU employed under the European and Global financial and economic crisis. The methodological basis of this article involves the systemic, structural-functional, comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation. The author describes main components as well as key instruments of the European soft power which are being used by the EU during the economic crisis in order to restore its reputational capital and stabilize the position of the European Union in the world system of political coordinates.


Keywords:

interests, the European Union, soft power, components, instruments, international relations, diplomacy, state, security, risks


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Galumov A.E. Rol' publichnoy diplomatii v formirovanii pozitivnogo imidzha ES v Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 4. - C. 77 - 85.
2. Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoy strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
3. Kuznetsov I.I. Vliyanie demonstratsionnykh effektov na stanovlenie politicheskikh institutov // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 412 - 425. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17162.
4. Aryamova A.D. Prakticheskaya realizatsiya tekhnologiy tsvetnykh revolyutsiy v Ukraine v 2004 i 2014 gg.: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 439 - 442. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17179.
5. Gyuler K. Bel'giyskiy federalizm kak forma upravleniya etnopoliticheskimi konfliktami // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 426 - 430. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17196.
6. Budaev A.V. Osnovnye podkhody k ispol'zovaniyu «myagkoy sily» v interesakh realizatsii vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 175 - 187. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.2.11784.
7. Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 68 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
8. Kosenko S.I. Faktor «myagkoy sily» v kul'turnoy diplomatii Frantsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 197 - 208. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.2.10167.
9. Manoylo A.V. Spetsifika tsvetnykh revolyutsiy «Arabskoy vesny». // Izvestiya Ural'sk. Federal'nogo Un-ta. Ser. 3. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. ¹3. S. 30-36.
10. Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskiy ocherk / Ser. Istoriya nauki. M., 2010.
11. Manoylo A.V. Siriyskiy tupik «Arabskoy vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. ¹6. S. 49-56.
12. Sledzevskiy I.V., Filippov V.R., Khabenskaya E.O. Vliyanie SMI na formirovanie etnicheskikh stereotipov obshchestvennogo soznaniya v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2005.
13. Khauer-Tyukarkina O.M. Aspekty formirovaniya vneshnepoliticheskoy imidzhevoy strategii sovremennoy FRG. Vladimir, 2013.
14. Nye J. The Paradox of American Power. Oxford, 2002.
15. Vertrag über die Europäische Union. Vertrag von Lissabon. Aktion Europa. Berlin, 2010.
16. Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, 1991.
17. Nye J.S. Soft Power: The Means To Success in World Politics. New York, 2004.
18. Galumov A.E. Perspektivy publichnoy diplomatii i imidzha ES v Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 118 - 127.
19. Veprintsev V.B. Vliyanie informatsionnoy sostavlyayushchey na vzaimodeystvie geopoliticheskikh sub'ektov // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 192 - 212. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12621. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12621.html
20. Vinogradova E.A. Rol' publichnoy diplomatii ALBA v uregulirovanii siriyskogo konflikta // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 55 - 65. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12619. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12619.html