Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Popov E.A. Modern sociological knowledge in the conditions of culture-centric cooperation of sciences

Abstract: The subject of this research is the interdisciplinary collaboration of sciences and knowledge overall, and sociological science in particular. The experience of the development of sciences most often confirms their formal mutual cooperation; at the same time methods and techniques of conducting the applied researchers are being borrowed. Every so often, sciences tolerate the partial use of the methods of empirical sociology. They do not evaluate neither the adequacy of implementation of one or another method or means of measurement, nor devise necessary tools. Such state of collaboration cannot be called interdisciplinary as it exists; thus, the article focuses of the determination of boundaries of interdisciplinarity within the socio-humanistic knowledge. The subject of the research is being reviewed in the broad spectrum of the value-conceptual phenomena within mutual systematic cooperation. Among the main conclusions are the following positions: sociology utilizes many research methods, and other sciences borrow first and foremost the methodological base. However, interdisciplinarity also provides other conditions and results of the collaboration of the scientific knowledge: a) theoretical and methodological reflection; b) accord of actions in resolution of a specific scientific problem; c) establishment of a connection with foreign researches; d) creation of  a scientific school, etc.


Keywords:

methodology, social knowledge, cognition, norms, values, sociology, society, culture, science, problems of sociology


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kirdina S. G. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya v ekonomike i sotsiologii: problemy metodologii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 60-75.
2. Kemerov V. E. Gumanitarnoe i sotsial'noe: ot oppozitsii k sintezu // Chelovek. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 5-19.
3. Kemerov V. E. Menyayushchayasya rol' sotsial'noy filosofii i tsivilizatsionnye proekty // Vestnik Rossiyskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2005. ¹ 3. S. 22-31.
4. Tambovtsev V. L. Instituty v sotsiologii, politologii i pravovedenii: vzglyad ekonomista // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2015. ¹ 1. S. 115-126.
5. Kiyashchenko L. P., Moiseev V. I. Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti. M.: Izd-vo In-ta filosofii RAN, 2009. 208 s.
6. Smirnov I. P. Istoriya mysli – istoriya filosofii: problema differentsiatsii // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 8-19.
7. Gorshkov M. K. Dialog rossiyskoy sotsiologii s obshchestvom i vlast'yu (opyt proshlogo, perspektivy budushchego) // Filosofskie nauki. 2011. ¹ 4. S. 13-25.
8. V.N. Porus Filosofiya — prostranstvo svobody // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 7. - C. 62 - 71.
9. E. A. Dolgova «Sintez vsekh vysshikh i konechnykh
10. rezul'tatov gumanitarnykh nauk…»:
11. ob integratsionnykh tendentsiyakh
12. v rossiyskom obshchestvovedenii pervoy
13. chetverti XX veka (opyt obrazovatel'nykh
14. i nauchnykh tsentrov) // Istoricheskiy zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2011. - 3. - C. 16 - 22.
15. V.M. Rozin K utochneniyu ponyatiya «nauka». // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 10. - C. 29 - 38.
16. V.A. Davydov Protsess rekonstruktsii istoricheskogo
17. proshlogo (osobennosti vliyaniya
18. kul'tury i obshchestva). // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 3. - C. 14 - 24.