Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Police activity
Reference:

Kuznetsova N.V. On the issue of unification of criminal liability for the crimes in the sphere of foreign-economic activity in the Eurasian Customs Union member-states

Abstract: The subject of the research includes the norms of criminal legislation, imposing responsibility for the crimes in the sphere of foreign-economic activity. The article considers customs crimes, committed on the territory of the Customs Union; analyzes the problems of national criminal legislation of the Russian Federation, Belarus and Kazakhstan, connected with the absence of a unified normative-legal base of the states, containing the unified list of penal actions, infringing the established order of foreign-economic activities, forms of punishment and other penal measures for such crimes. The methodology of the study is based on the general scientific dialectical method of cognition. Other methods also play a significant role: the formal-legal method, the comparative-legal method, the method of legal modeling, the statistical and other methods. The author comes to the conclusion about the need for the provision of economic safety of the Customs Union member-states through the unification of criminal legislation of the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Kazakhstan, which should have the common comprehensive list of socially dangerous acts, considered as crimes on the whole territory of the Customs Union, the punishments for such crimes and other penal measures. 


Keywords:

foreign-economic activity, customs crimes, the Customs Union, unification, punishment, smuggling, customs integration, economic activity, customs area, interaction


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Lyutov V.A. Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za kontrabandu po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 16-18.
2. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. ot 13.06.1996 ¹ 63-FZ// Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF, 17.06.1996, ¹ 25, st. 2954, Ross. gaz, ¹ 113, 18.06.1996, ¹ 114, 19.06.1996, ¹N 115, 20.06.1996, ¹ 118, 25.06.1996.
3. Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan. ot 03.07.2014 ¹226-V// URL: www.http://online.zakon.kz (data obrashcheniya 16.11.2015)
4. Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus'. ot 09.07.1999 ¹ 275-Z//URL: http://kodeksy-by.com/ugolovnyj_kodeks_rb/44.htm (data obrashcheniya 15.11.2015)
5. Maksimov Yu. Pravovye i organizatsionnye osobennosti razvitiya Tamozhennogo soyuza // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2011. ¹ 3. S. 89
6. Grachev O.V. Ugolovnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federatsii v tamozhennoy sfere // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 20-22.
7. Grachev O.V. Gosudarstvennyy kontrol' kak effektivnyy mekhanizm protivodeystviya ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2013. ¹ 5. S. 32-35.
8. Cayt Rossiyskoy gazety URL:http://www.rg.ru/2010/07/02/putin.html (data obrashcheniya 16.11.2015).
9. Tekst poslaniya prezidenta federal'nomu sobraniyu na 2015 god: http://importozamechenie.ru/tekst-poslaniya-prezidenta-federalnomu-sobraniyu-na-2015-god/(data obrashcheniya 16.11.2015)