Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Tadzhibov V.R. Administrative-jurisdictional process and its implementation in police activities

Abstract: The author notes that according to the range of embodied social relations administrative process is rather wide; moreover, legal procedure is implemented by a large number of police officers, each of them is responsible for the particular aspect of procedural activity. Therefore, the author observes that at present the methodological provision of this sphere of Russian police activities is necessary. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the theoretical and general scientific methods of cognition (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical), and the methods used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.). The author notes that administrative proceeding in the police bodies is a jurisdictional process. It is argued that its main task is a procedural provision of measures of application of state coercion, particularly, of administrative punishment. The peculiarities of administrative proceeding in the police bodies depend on a range of factors, such as the completeness, the temporal and territorial criteria, the use of certain types of administrative punishment, and the different categories of persons.


Keywords:

participant, form, coercion, police, stage, jurisdiction, process, proceedings, offence, responsibility


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' grazhdan v SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1989.
2. Bakhrakh D.N., Renov E.N. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. M., 1989.
3. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1999.
4. Vasil'ev A.S., Orzikh M.F. K voprosu o sootnoshenii i otraslevoy prinadlezhnosti administrativnogo protsessa i proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v organakh vnutrennikh del. Kiev, 1983.
5. Galagan I.A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR (protsessual'noe regulirovanie). Voronezh, 1976.
6. Dyad'kin O.N. Pravovoy status litsa, privlekaemogo k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti (po materialam administrativnoy praktiki organov vnutrennikh del): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
7. Korenev A.P. Normy administrativnogo prava i ikh primenenie. M., 1978.
8. Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
9. Tadzhibov V.R. K voprosu o soderzhaii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 955 - 959. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12675.
10. Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
11. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8841. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
12. Kurakin A.V. Administrativno-yurisdiktsionnaya deyatel'nost' politsii: problemy teorii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 3. - C. 259 - 271. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.3.11115.