Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Doynikov I.V. The experience of state-building in the USSR and the People's Republic of China

Abstract: 1. The article focuses on the legal and organizational problems of state building in the USSR and China. The object of the article is the circle of social relations associated with reforming of the economy and social sphere in the system of public administration. The author of the article pays special attention to the forms and methods of public administration reform in the USSR and the People's Republic of China. Special attention is paid to the theory of the problem, as well as to the system mistakes that had been made in the public administration in the period of perestroika. 2. The methodology of the research is based on the modern achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation), the traditional legal methods and the methods used in special sociological research..3. The main conclusions of the study relate to the improvement of legal organizational problems of public administration. The novelty of the paper lies in the fact that from various positions it gives a comprehensive assessment of the restructuring of the times of the 1980s. Special contribution of the article is that it continues the study of the system crisis of the post-Soviet law, initiated by the author in previous publications, where he had systematically revealed some problems of modern Russian statehood and set them out in the Programme of the course "Problems of state and law in transition".


Keywords:

reform, power, government, law, crisis, system, perestroika, China, management, reforming


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Mezhuev B. «Perestroyka-2». Opyt povtoreniya. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2014. – 208 s.
2. Byzov L. Perestroyka nashe proshloe ili nashe budushchee? // Literaturnaya gazeta. ¹ 1-2 21-27 yanvarya 2015 g.
3. Burov V.G. Kitay i kitaytsy glazami rossiyskogo uchenogo. – M., 2000. – S. 123.
4. Bushev A.Yu., Makarova O.A., Popondopulo V.F. Kommercheskoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran / Pod red. V.F. Popondupulo. – SPb., 2003. S. 253.
5. Piliya D.E. Sistema i struktura organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti Respubliki Abkhaziya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 6. - C. 31 - 34.
6. Dobrynin N.M. Kratkiy ocherk o sud'be rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma: o sushchnosti, evolyutsii i neotlozhnosti konstitutsionnoy reformy // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 12. - C. 1737 - 1752. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10142.
7. F. K. Esieva Evolyutsiya vysshikh organov gosudarstvennoy
8. vlasti na zavershayushchem etape razvitiya
9. sovetskoy gosudarstvennosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 13 - 18.
10. Troshchinskiy P.V. Osnovnye etapy formirovaniya
11. sovremennoy pravovoy sistemy
12. Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya / Journal of foreighn legislation and comparative law. - 2012. - 4. - C. 69 - 79.