Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2071,   Articles in work: 296 Declined articles: 784 
Library

Bel'kovich R.Yu. The Subject of Secession: The Issue of Legitimacy

Published in journal "Politics and Society", 2015-4 in rubric "Democracy and political processes", pages 522-530.

Resume: The present study is dedicated to the theoretical consideration of the construction of the sibject of secession. The phenomenon of secession threatens the established political and legal order both on global and national levels, as modern law is based on the priority of territorial integrity of the state. At the same time, the majority of modern democratic states pretend that the power exercised by them is of contractual nature. The author examines the question, to what extent the contraposition of the constructs of "nation" (as an admittedly legitimate power holder, having the right for political self-determination) and "subject of secession" (as a potential violator of territorial integrity) is theoretically contradictory and reflects repressive trends of a modern state. The author uses the principle of methodological individualism as the main approach, which implies narrowing of any social phenomena to the behaviour of certain individuals. For the first time the author considers secession as an expression of internal contradictions of statehood, which emerged in the modern era. The author comes up with a conclusion that secession cannot be regarded as an "emergency", since the very existence of a modern state, based on the principle of the rule of the people, implies secession as a necessary form of the self-determination of individuals.

Keywords: international law, territorial integrity, revolution, people, sovereignty, state, self-determination, secession, pluralism, democracy

DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.4.14819

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990.
Deklaratsiya nezavisimosti / Soedinennye Shtaty Ameriki: Konstitutsiya i zakonodatel'stvo. Pod red. O.A. Zhidkova. M., 1993.
Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoy filosofii prava / Marks K. Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda i drugie rannie filosofskie raboty. M., 2010.
Markuze G. Razum i revolyutsiya. SPb., 2000.
Russo Zh.-Zh. Ob obshchestvennom dogovore, ili Printsipy politicheskogo prava. / Russo Zh.-Zh. Traktaty M., 1969.
Beran H. A Liberal Theory of Secession // Political Studies. Vol.32. 1984. Pp. 21-31.
Brilmayer L. Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation // Yale Journal of International Law, 16. No.1. 1991. Pp. 177-202.
Buchanan A. Secession. The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Oxford, 1991.
Christiano T. A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy // Journal of Social Philosophy, 37. No.1. 2006. Pp. 81-107.
Secession. International Law Perspectives. Ed. by Marcelo G. Kohen. N.Y., 2006.
Spooner L. No Treason. No. I, II / The Lysander Spooner Reader. San Francisco, 1992.
Spooner L. No Treason. No. VI. Boston, 1870.
The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Vol.V. N.Y.: The Knickerbocker Press, 1895.
Wellman C.H. A Theory of Secession. N.Y., 2005

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard