Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2031,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 806 
Library

Zanitti F.B. Future Davos forum in Kyrgyzstan

Published in journal "Conflict Studies / nota bene", 2015-1 in rubric "The battle for resources", pages 78-84.

Resume: This article is intended to clarify several sociopolitical issues regarding the Central Asian region. Do we detect a new approach that Russia, together with India and China, uses to form a multipolar world? Will the new Davos forum in Kyrgyzstan attract the leaders of the most influential Central Asian countries, and become as representative as its European prototype? Late 2014 was marked by the signing of several bilateral agreements during Summits involving Russia, India and China. According to numerous international experts, improved relations between Moscow and the two Asian giants (China and India), represents another big step in transforming a unipolar world order with the USA as the only leading country into a multipolar world. The analysis of the main reasons for Beijing and New Deli becoming closer with Moscow will start with the complications in Russia-US relations. One of the reasons for Russia-West relations becoming colder is the position of Russia in the Ukrainian crisis, which resulted in Russian leadership reaching a decision to expand their foreign policy vector in Eastern direction. With that said, tighter connections of Russia, China and India fully reflects long-term interests of those countries. Despite several questionable moments in Russian foreign policy in Eastern Europe and Near East, Beijing and New Deli view Russia as a reliable partner for further dialogue, cooperation and trade. The Russia-China cooperation, since 1990s, is actively developing, while strategic Russia-India partnership still maintains the image of the USSR era, when the Cold War took place. We also cannot discount the fact that Russia, India and China are already working together in many international organizations, like the BRICS forum (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and, on this basis, they already have opportunities to develop new platforms for political, economic, and military cooperation, like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. At the same time, the Russia-India-China strategic triangle already has a huge potential for combining efforts to achieve mutual goals, which can, in turn, give birth to a new model of international dialog, signature for the newly-forming multipolar world.

Keywords: politics, international security, geopolitics, trend, state, security, diplomacy, international relations, international life, interests.

DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.1.14205

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
www.moderndiplomacy.eu
Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya
amerikanskogo ekspansionizma:
ot doktriny Monro
k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
Karyakin V.V. Sovreemnnye krizisy i konflikty: osobennsoti, stsenarii razvitiya i predotvrashchenie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 446 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.11422.
Kalachev D.N. Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoy bezopasnosti: sredovye parametry // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 544 - 549. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.4.13243.
Galves Derolle P. Brazil – New Age // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 136 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13181.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Geopoliticheskiy klientelizm v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: strategiya i taktika Zapada. // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 2. - C. 189 - 193. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.2.11365.
Manoylo A.V. Rol' strategiy upravlyaemogo khaosa v formirovanii novogo miroporyadka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 638 - 651. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816.
Kurilkin A.V. Sovremennye podkhody k vedeniyu informatsionnykh voyn // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 75 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10063.
Vinogradova E.A. Informatsionnye voyny v Latinskoy Amerike // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 4. - C. 372 - 384. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.4.13080.
Valiullin I.I. Evolyutsiya ponyatiya «informatsionnaya voyna» v politicheskoy nauke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 68 - 74. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10064.
Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
Guan'tsyun' L. Rol' tayvan'skoy problemy
v morskoy politike KNR // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 469 - 509. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9754.
Afanas'ev V.V. Sovremennye lokal'nye konflikty // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 56 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10061.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard