Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Schebetenko, S. A. Reflected Attitudes to Personality Features as a Predictor of Students’ Academic Success

Abstract: In this article Schebetenko offers a definition of the ‘reflected attitude to personality feature’ as an individual opinion on what his significant others view as a positive or negative personality feature. In terms of the five-factor model of personality (McCrae & Costa, 1996, 2013) this construct is viewed as a particular case of typical metacognitive adaptations. The latter represent the ‘thoughts about features’, i.e. the element of personality structure being monitored by an individual. 1030 university students participated in the research of how a reflected attitude to a personality feature may predict the academic success taking into account the statistical control of a particular personality feature and other metacognitive adaptations. This is a correlational research. The researcher has studied the Big Five of personality traits and metacognitive adaptations including dispositional efficiency, attitude to a feature, reflected feature and reflected attitude to a feature. The following indicators of academic success have been studied: results of the Russian language and mathematics USE and quarterly academic records. The main hypotheses have been proved by the means of correlation and hierarchic multiple regression analysis. Schebetenko has discovered that reflected attitudes to friendliness, diligence and neuroticism can make additional contribution to academic success, even after the statistical control of a personality feature and other metacognitive adaptations associated with it. The researcher proves that the particular influence of a reflected attitude to personality traits can make an individual to positively react to these features among other people, for example, students or lecturers. Generally speaking, this can lead to the formation of a certain environment around an individual which, in particular, can stimulate his academic activity.


Keywords:

personality features, social attitudes, intersubjectivity, five-factor model, academic success, USE (Unified State Exam), friendliness, diligence, neuroticism, metacognition.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. SAGE.
2. Tice, D. M., & Wallace, H. M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). Guilford Press.
3. Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J.-O. W., & Schuler, H. (2007). Meta-analysis of the re-lationship between the Big Five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 132–151.
4. Sutin, A. R. (2008). Autobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiograph-ical memory mediates basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 1060–1066.
5. Slobodskaya, H. R. (2007). The associations among the Big Five, behavioural inhibi-tion and behavioural approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia. Personali-ty and Individual Differences, 43(4), 913–924.
6. Shchebetenko, S., & Bergfeld, A. Y. (unpublished manuscript). Reflected personality traits and attitudes toward personality as metacognitive characteristic adaptations that contribute to academic achievement in Russian universities.
7. Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549–573.
8. Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of univer-sity students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bul-letin, 138(2), 353–387.
9. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and ac-ademic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
10. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behav-iorist. University of Chicago Press.
11. Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The history of attitudes and persuasion research. In A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 285–320). New York: Psychology Press.
12. Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. (A. E. Murphy, Ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
13. Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relat-ing the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Inte-grative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(3), 252–272.
14. McAbee, S. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta-analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 532–544.
15. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford Press.
16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2013). Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In T. A. Widiger, P. T. Costa, & Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed.) (pp. 15–27). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
17. Laing, R. D., Phillipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research (Vol. vii). Oxford, England: Springer.
18. Löckenhoff, C. E., Terracciano, A., Ferrucci, L., & Costa, P. T. (2012). Five-factor personality traits and age trajectories of self-rated health: The role of question framing. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 375–401.
19. Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Inter-personal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 390–398.
20. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 145–161.
21. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An ex-pansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154.
22. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Rob-ins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Digireads.com Publishing.
24. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
25. Gillespie, A. (2012). Position exchange: The social development of agency. New Ide-as in Psychology, 30(1), 32–46.
26. Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., Donnellan, M. B., Samuel, D. B., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … Skodol, A. E. (2013). Ten year rank-order stability of personality traits and disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 335–344.
27. Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self, Volume 4: The self in social perspective. Psychology Press.
28. Farmer, S. M., & Van Dyne, L. (2010). The idealized self and the situated self as pre-dictors of employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 503–516.
29. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. Transaction Publishers.
30. DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828.
31. Cook, W. L., & Douglas, E. M. (1998). The looking-glass self in family context: A social relations analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(3), 299–309.
32. Shchebetenko S.A. (neopubl.). Metakognitivnye kharakternye adaptatsii.
33. Shchebetenko S.A. Ustanovki na cherty lichnosti v kontekste Bol'shoy Pyaterki // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, v pechati.
34. Shchebetenko S.A., Tyutikova E.A. «Kartina khorosha, potomu chto khorosha otkrytost' opytu»: oposreduyushchaya rol' ustanovok na cherty v individual'nykh razlichiyakh otnosheniya k zhivopisi // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki, v pechati.
35. Allik, J., & Realo, A. (1997). Intelligence, academic abilities, and personality. Per-sonality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 809–814.
36. Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity: cultural change and the struggle for self. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
37. Pervin L., Dzhon O. Psikhologiya lichnosti: Teoriya i issledovaniya. M: Aspekt-Press, 2001. 607 s.
38. ¹ 27. 6. Merlin V.S. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Pedagogika, 1986. 253 c.
39. Aronson E. Obshchestvennoe zhivotnoe. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu psikhologiyu. M: Aspekt-Press, 1998. 517 c.
40. Vygotskiy L.S., Luriya A.R. Etyudy po istorii povedeniya: Obez'yana. Primitiv. Rebenok. M: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 224 c.
41. Dorfman L.Ya. Metaindividual'nyy mir. M: Smysl, 1993. 456 c.
42. Dorfman L.Ya. Kontseptsiya metaindividual'nogo mira: sovremennoe sostoyanie. // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey Shkoly Ekonomiki. 2006. T. 3. ¹ 3. S. 3–34.
43. Kochergina E.V., Nay D., Orel E.A. Faktory «Bol'shoy pyaterki» kak psikhologicheskie prediktory akademicheskoy uspevaemosti studentov vuzov // Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013. T.