Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Belikov, A. V. Esthetics of the Sublime and Canon in the Late Ancient and Byzantine Art

Abstract: The question about cultural and ideological reasons of the origin of Christian art in the late Ancient Times is still a rather understudied topic. The grounds for creating the fine art canon that defined the particularity of the Byzantine Art are still rather unknown, too, while canonic art itself is rather a well-studied phenomenon. The present article touches upon the problems of esthetical and spiritual experience in art of the early Christian and Byzantine epochs. The author analyzes the process of creation of esthetic concepts and transformation of artistic canons, the shift of the esthetic modus and refusal from the idea of the beauty and replacement of it with the idea of the sublime. Special attention is devoted to studying ways and methods of application of anagogic experience in art and analysis of the role of creative fantasy as a special form of esthetic experience. The topic under research lies at the interface of esthetics, theology, cultural research and art studies which creates the need for application of interdisciplinary methods and attraction of a wide circle of sources. Canon is presented by the author as a set of rules and recommendations aimed at artistic fixation of the so called anagogic spiritual experience typical for Eastern Christianity. Canon is presented as a mechanism regulating the process of creative imagination of an icon painter. The process of imagination is defined as a specific form of the imaginary space where theoretical categories become the images to be understood.

Keywords:

Byzantine canon, icon, mystical experience, fantasy, esthetic experience, symbol, artistic image, the sumblime, mimetic representation, anagoge.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Tertullian (De Carne Christi. 9), tsit. po Tertullian. Apologiya. M.: AST. 2004. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.biblestudy.ru/lib/patrologia/27383-apologiya-tertullian
2. Propretrik, gl.4. Tsit. po Kliment Aleksandriiskii. Uveshchevanie k yazychnikam. / Per. A. Yu. Bratukhina. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo RKhGI, 1998. 208 S.
3. Flavii Filostrat. Zhizn' Apolloniya Tianskogo. – M.: Nauka, 1985. – Rezhim dostupa: http://krotov.info/acts/03/1/filostrat_00.htm
4. Dionisii Areopagit. Korpus Areopagitikum. O tserkovnoi ierarkhii. tsit. po Vostochnye ottsy i uchiteli Tserkvi V veka. Antologiya. – M.: Izdatel'stvo MFTI, 2000. Rezhim dostupa: http://krotov.info/acts/05/antolog/page26.htm
5. Stoglav. Izd. D. E. Kozhanchikova. − SPb., 1863. S. 128.
6. Plotin. Enneady. T. V – S-Pb.: Izd. Olega Abyshko, 2005.
7. Vasilii Velikii. Beseda na den' svyatykh chetyredesyati muchenikov i O Svyatom Dukhe, 18, 27. Besedy. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo podvor'ya Svyato-Troitskoi Sergievoi Lavry, 2001.-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.pagez.ru/lsn/0290.php
8. Vitruvii Mark Pollion. Desyat' knig ob arkhitekture / Per. F. A. Petrovskogo. T. 1. — M.: Izd-vo Vses. Akademii arkhitektury, 1936. — 331 s.
9. Al'berti L-B. Tri knigi o zhivopisi // Al'berti L-B. Desyat' knig o zodchestve. V2-kh tt. T. 2. M., 1937.
10. Dyurer A. Traktaty. t.2 – L.-M.: Iskusstvo, 1957. – 254 s.
11. Ioann Damaskin. Tri zashchititel'nykh slova protiv poritsayushchikh svyatye ikony ili izobrazheniya. — Sergiev Posad: TSL, 1993.-168 s.
12. Isaak Sirin. O bozhestvennykh tainakh i o dukhovnoi zhizni: Novootkrytye teksty.-SPb.: Aleteiya, 2003.-256 s.
13. Maksim Ispovednik. Izbrannye tvoreniya / Per. i kommentarii A. I. Sidorova.-M.: Palomnik'', 2004.-494 s.
14. Mnogotsennaya zhemchuzhina. Literaturnoe tvorchestvo siriitsev, koptov i romeev v 1 tys. n. e. — M., Ladomir. 1994. Per. Averintsev S.S.
15. Nemezii Emesskii, episkop. O prirode cheloveka / Perevod F.S. Vladimirskogo. M., 1998.
16. Origen. O nachalakh. – SPb.: Amfora, 2000. – 382 s.
17. Ottsy i uchiteli tserkvi III veka: Antologiya v dvukh tomakh / Sost. Illarion (Alfeev). – M.: Libris, 1996. – 464 s.
18. Dvořák M. Kunstgeschichte als Geistesgeschichte («Katakombenmalereien. Die Anfänge der christlichen Kunst»)− München 1924. S. 3–40.
19. Grabar A. Plotin et les origines de l'esthétique médiévale. // Cahiers archéologiques. Fin de l'antiquité et Moyen Age, vol. 1, 1945, p. 15-34.
20. Mango C. The art of the Byzantine Empire 312-1453. − New Jersey, 1972.
21. Schweizer B. Mimesis und Phantasia // Philologus.1934. Bd.39. S. 286-300.
22. Averintsev S. S. Poetika rannevizantiiskoi literatury. Zoloto v sisteme simvolov rannevizantiiskoi kul'tury. — SPb: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. S. 404-422.
23. Averintsev S.C. Khristianskii aristotelizm kak vnutrennyaya forma zapadnoi traditsii i problemy sovremennoi Rossii // Ritorika i istoki evropeiskoi kul'turnoi traditsii. — M., 1996. — stb. 319—329, 347—367.
24. Averintsev S.S. Simvol // Averintsev S. S. Sofiya-Logos: Slovar'. — 2-e izd. ispr. — Kiev: Dukh i Litera, 2001. — S. 155—161.
25. Alpatov M.V. Iskusstvo Feofana Greka i uchenie isikhastov. // Vizantiiskii vremennik. 1972.-T.ZZ.-S. 190-202.
26. Bel'ting X. Obraz i kul't. Istoriya obraza do epokhi iskusstva / per. s nem. K.A.Piganovich.-M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2002.-752 s.
27. Burkkhardt T. Sakral'noe iskusstvo Vostoka i Zapada. Printsipy i metody. – SPb.: Aleteiya, 1999. – 216 s.
28. Bychkov V.V. Malaya istoriya vizantiiskoi estetiki. — Kiev: Put' k Istine, 1991.-407 c.
29. Vel'flin G. Osnovnye ponyatiya istorii iskusstv. M.: V. Shevchuk, 2009.-344 s.
30. Vygotskii L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva.-M.: Iskusstvo, 1986.-341s.
31. Dvorzhak M. Istoriya iskusstva kak istoriya dukha.-SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2001. – 336 s.
32. Demus O. Mozaiki vizantiiskikh khramov.-M.: Indrik, 2001.-160 s.
33. Zhivov V.M. «Mistagogiya» Maksima Ispovednika i razvitie vizantiiskoi teorii obraza // Khudozhestvennyi yazyk srednevekov'ya. M.: Nauka, 1982. S. 108-127.
34. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. // tt. 1-3. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2011.
35. Lidov A.M. Ierotopiya. Prostranstvennye ikony i obrazy-paradigmy v vizantiiskoi kul'ture.-M.: Feoriya, 2009. – 352 s.
36. Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. — 2-e izd., ispr. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. — 320 s.
37. Losev A. F. Khudozhestvennye kanony kak problema stilya. — «Vopr. estetiki», 1964, ¹ 6, s. 351—399; On zhe. O ponyatii khudozhestvennogo kanona. — V kn.: Problema kanona v drevnem i srednevekovom iskusstve Azii i Afriki, s. 6—15.
38. Lotman Yu.M. Kanonicheskoe iskusstvo kak informatsionnyi paradoks // Problema kanona v drevnem i srednevekovom iskusstve.-M., 1973.-S.16-22.
39. Panofskii, E., Perspektiva kak «simvolicheskaya forma». — SPb,: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. – 336 s.
40. Raushenbakh B.V. Prostranstvennye postroeniya v drevnerusskoi zhivopisi.-M . : Nauka, 1975.-185 s.
41. Raushenbakh B.V. Geometriya kartiny i zritel'noe vospriyatie. − SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2001. 320 S.
42. Rotenberg E.I. Ot kanona k stilyu. // Voprosy iskusstvoznaniya 2-3/94. M., 1994. S. 175-187.
43. Uspenskii B. A. «Pravoe» i «levoe» v ikonopisnom izobrazhenii. // Sbornik statei po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam.-Tartu, 1973,-s. 137–145.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.