Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Toropygin O.Y. On the issue of criminalizing the act of infringement upon the rights and interests of copyright holders of trademarks of products and services

Abstract: The authors and trademark owners are concerned about the manufacturing and sales of counterfeit products, the scale of which poses a serious threat to the economic security of Russian Federation. The fakes market spans from shoes and clothes, to audio and video devices. The most significant cause for concern is the problem of counterfeit medications. However, there is an opinion among scholars working on this issue that the legal ramifications (stated in section 180 of the Criminal Code of Russia) for the illegal use of registered trademarks do not correspond to the actual public demand for criminal accountability. Within the theory of criminal law, this matter still remains quite controversial; and unfortunately, the consensus is yet to be reached on this issue. In this work, the author attempts to demonstrate the reasons that justify the criminalization of these actions. This research was conducted based on the accumulation of general scientific and socio-legal methods. In solving specific tasks in this research, the following methods were used: statistical, analytical, comparative legal and others. As a result of the conducted research, the author comes to following conclusions: the actions, which violate the legal use of a registered trademark, service mark, the place of origin of a product, or similar marking on a product of same type, give grounds to their criminalization due to their high public risk and their relative commonness. At the same time, the illegal use of a registered trademark symbol with regards to means of individualization that were not registered within Russian Federation, does not provide grounds (conditions) for the criminalization of these actions: section 1225 of the Civil Code of Russia does not define it as a result of intellectual activity, thus it is unclear exactly whose rights are being violated.


Keywords:

Public risk, criminalization, copyright holder, rights of a copyright holder, trademark, service mark, product’s place of origin, registered trademark symbol, conspiracy to commit crime, organized crime.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alekseenko N.N. Ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika prestupleniy v sfere registratsii nezakonnykh sdelok s zemley: monografiya. M.: Yurist, 2013. 152 s.
2. Brend «Deti podzemel'ya» Shchit i Mech' ot 14.07.2013 http://www.ormvd.ru
3. Vorozheykina A.G., Yusufov A.Sh. Rynok kontrafaktnoy produktsii i ego struktura v Rossii i za rubezhom // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Kontrafakt. Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki: sb. nauch. trud. pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk V.N.Lopatina. T.2. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurayt, 2009. S. 49.
4. Gal'perin I.M. Ugolovnaya politika i ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo./Osnovnye napravleniya bor'by s prestupnost'yu. M. Yurid. Lit. 1975. S. 58.
5. Gorelik A., Mazein V. Praktika vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnykh del po faktam proizvodstva i rasprostraneniya fal'sifitsirovannykh lekarstvennykh sredstv. // Pravo i zhizn'. 2007. ¹ 113 (8). S. 21 – 26.
6. Dagel' P.S. Usloviya ustanovleniya ugolovnoy nakazuemosti.// Pravovedenie, 1975, ¹ 4. S.67-74.
7. Zhayvoronok A.V. Nezakonnoe ispol'zovanie tovarnogo znaka kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie. Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010. S.17.
8. Itogi press-konferentsii na temu: «Bor'ba s nezakonnym oborotom kontrafaktnoy produktsii na territorii moskovskoy oblasti» 27 iyunya 2013 Glavnogo upravleniya MVD Rossii po Moskovskoy oblasti. http://50.mvd.ru/press/reliaze/item/ (data obrashcheniya 2 iyunya 2014 goda).
9. Kalinovskiy V.E. Okhrana tovarnogo znaka v FRG. M. 1984. S.40
10. Klepitskiy I.A. Sistema khozyaystvennykh prestupleniy. M., 2005. {Elektronnyy resurs} Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy PS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. Kostin A.V. Otsenka ubytkov pravoobladateley tovarnykh znakov ot kontrafaktsii. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M. 2009. S. 3.
12. Kommentariy k postanovleniyam Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii po ugolovnym delam (2-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) (pod red. M.V. Lebedeva) NORMA, 2008.
13. Korobeev A.I. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika: vyalotekushchaya evolyutsiya ili radikal'noe reformirovanie ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva?/ Ugolovnaya politika i pravo v epokhu peremen. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii posvyashchennoy pamyati professora P.S. Dagelya. Vladivostok. Izd-vo Dal'nevostochnogo universiteta. 2010. S. 30, 31. 364 s.
14. Kurlyandskiy V.I. Ugolovnaya politika: differentsiatsiya i individualizatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti. V kn.: Osnovnye napravleniya bor'by s prestupnost'yu. S. 81.
15. Luk'yanova V.Yu. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode tekhnicheskikh usloviy // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. 2014. ¹ 4.
16. Nikitina L.K. Osnovnye napravleniya optimizatsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe ispol'zovanie tovarnogo znaka. Obshchestvo i pravo. 2010, ¹ 1. S. 172 –177.
17. O sostoyanii pravovoy okhrany i zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2008 godu. Analiticheskiy doklad / pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk V.N.Lopatina, M., RNIIIS, 2009, 325 S.
18. O sostoyanii pravovoy okhrany i zashchity intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2010 godu. Analiticheskiy doklad /pod red. Lopatina V.N. M. Izdatel'stvo Soveta Federatsii, 2009.S. 307. 438 s.
19. Po dannym ofitsial'nogo Internet-sayta Ministerstva vnutrennikh del RF. URL: http://www.mvd.ru (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2014).
20. Prozumentov L.M. Kriminologicheskie usloviya kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 2012. ¹4 (6)
21. http://www.sarmat-tm.ru. Zapros proizvodilsya 6 iyunya 2014 goda
22. Ugolovnyy kodeks Kitayskoy Narodnoy Respubliki /Pod red. A.I. Korobeeva. perevod D.V. Vichikova SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. 2001. S. 147-148.
23. Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.11.2001¹ 144-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks RSFSR» «Rossiyskaya gazeta», 2001. ¹ 227.