Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Kamoza, T. M. The Discourse of the Cultural Trauma: Methodological Potential of a New Approach to Studying Philosophy of the Epoch of the Imperial Modernization of Russia

Abstract: The article is devoted to the phenomenon of cultural trauma as a reflection of the collective identity crisis experiencing by the society under the conditions of its modernization ‘transit’ to the industrial stage of development. Overcoming of the social crisis and restoration of the previous identity or acquiring a new identity are shown as a unique traumatic process that has its own logic of development and affects, first of all, the central system of values and the institutional system of society. According to the author, without the analysis of the socio-cultural trauma it would be impossible to develop relevant ‘coping strategies’, i.e. particular patterns used by the society to overcome this trauma. Speaking of the methods used in the present research, it is necessary to note that in addition to Edward Shils’ concept of ‘center and periphery’, for the first time in academic literature the author analyzes Piotr Sztompka’s concept of cultural trauma as one of the methodological bases for studying socio-cultural dynamics of modernization in general and imperial modernization of Russia in particular. According to the author, analysis of Russian philosophical and philosophical-legal heritage of the second half of the XIXth –beginning of the XXth centuries (involving the following ‘immigrants’ decades as well) will allow to see efforts of Russian philosophers to ‘see, understand and present’ to the society the cultural traumas experienced by them, ‘coping strategies’ of dealing with these traumas including active (‘cultural –creative’) and passive (‘ritualistic’) strategies. Even though those efforts did not play the essential role in society’s understanding of ongoing social transformations, today they allow us to better understand the ‘hidden flows’ of the socio-cultural development of the imperial modernization of Russia.


Keywords:

cultural trauma, collective identity crisis, modernization theory, transformation of values, system of values of society, institutional system of society, coping strategies, the age of changes, social crisis, transition epoch.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Modernization in the Middle East: The Ottoman Empire and Its Afro-Asian Successors / Eds. S. Black, C. Brown. Princeton: Darwin Press, 1992.
2. Lee R. Modernity, Modernities and Modernization: Tradition Reappraised // Social Science Information. 2013. 52 (3). P. 409-424.
3. McDaniel T. Autocracy, Modernization, and Revolution in Russia and Iran. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
4. Kaya I. Modernity, Openness, Interpretation: A Perspective on Multiple Modernities // Social Science Information. 2004. 43 (1). P. 35–57.
5. Inglehart R., Baker W. E. Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values // American Sociological Review. 2000. Vol. 65. No. 1. P. 19-51
6. Inglehart R. Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
7. Fourie E.A Future for the Theory of Multiple Modernities: Insights from the New Modernization Theory // Social Science Information. 2012. 51 (1). P. 52-69.
8. Eisenstadt S. N. Social Evolution and Modernity: Some Observations on Parsons's Comparative and Evolutionary Analysis Parsons's Analysis from the Perspective of Multiple Modernities // American Sociologist. 2004. Winter. P. 5-24.
9. Daedalus.Vol. 129.No. 1.Winter, 2000.Multiple Modernities; Eisenstadt S. N. Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. In 2 vol. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2003.
10. Comparative Modernization: A Reader / Ed. by C. E. Black. N.Y.-L.: The Free Press, 1976.
11. Atabaki T. The State and the Subaltern.Modernization, Society and the State in Turkey and Iran. L.: I.B. Tauris, 2007.
12. Etatistskie modeli modernizatsii. M.: IF RAN, 2002; i dr.
13. Fedotova V. G., Kolpakov V. A., Fedotova N. N. Global'nyy kapitalizm: tri velikie transformatsii. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2008.
14. Poberezhnikov I. V. Perekhod ot traditsionnogo k industrial'nomu obshchestvu: teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy modernizatsii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006.
15. Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: razmyshlyaya o samobytnosti. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2008.
16. Perekhodnye epokhi v sotsial'nom izmerenii: Istoriya i sovremennost'. M.: Nauka, 2003. S. 7.
17. Pantin V.I. Volny i tsikly sotsial'nogo razvitiya: Tsivilizatsionnaya dinamika i protsessy modernizatsii. M.: Nauka, 2004.
18. Modernizatsiya v Rossii i konflikt tsennostey. M.: IF RAN, 1994.
19. Modernizatsiya i globalizatsiya: obrazy Rossii v XXI veke. M.: IF RAN, 2002.
20. Menyayushchayasya sotsial'nost': novye formy modernizatsii i progressa. M.: IF RAN, 2010.
21. Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu / Pod red. L. Kharrisona i S. Khantingtona. M.: Mosk. shk. polit. issled., 2002.
22. Demokratiya i modernizatsiya: k diskussii o vyzovakh XXI veka. M.: Izd-vo «Evropa», 2010.
23. Inglkhart R., Vel'tsel' K. Modernizatsiya, kul'turnye izmeneniya i demokratiya: Posledovatel'nost' chelovecheskogo razvitiya. M.: Novoe izd-vo, 2011.
24. Gavrov S. N. Modernizatsiya Rossii: postimperskiy tranzit. M.: MGUDT, 2010.
25. Vallerstayn I. Posle liberalizma. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003.
26. Vasil'ev L. S. Modernizatsiya kak istoricheskiy fenomen (o general'nykh zakonomernostyakh evolyutsii). M.: Fond «Liberal'naya missiya1. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb.: Piter, 2008.
27. Belyaeva L. A. Sotsial'naya modernizatsiya», 2011.
28. v Rossii v kontse KhKh veka. M.: IF RAN, 1997.
29. Multiple Modernities / Ed. by S. N. Eisenstadt. New Bruswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 2002.
30. Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations / Eds. D. Sachsenmaier, J. Riedel, S. N. Eisenstadt. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
31. Schmidt V. H. Multiple Modernities or Varieties of Modernity? // Current Sociology. January 2006. 54 (1). P. 77-97
32. Shmuel N. Eisenstadt: Multiple Modernities-A Paradigma of Cultural and Social Evolution // ProtoSociology. 2007. Vol. 24; etc.