|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Sidorov, E.I.
The object of proof and evidence in cases on administrative offences in the sphere of customs.
// Administrative and municipal law.
2014. ¹ 9.
P. 922-928.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65448
Sidorov, E.I. The object of proof and evidence in cases on administrative offences in the sphere of customs.Abstract: The article is devoted to the topical issues of the object of proof and application of evidence in administrative offence cases in the sphere of customs in the condition of formation and functioning of the Customs Union. The author studies the legal foundations, definition, types and specific features of evidence, their role in the administrative jurisdiction process of the customs bodies, procedural regulation and means of their improvement. Currently due to formation and functioning of the Customs Union within the framework of the EurAsEC there is an ongoing liberation of administrative and customs legislation. However, law-enforcement function is still is one of the foremost important directions in the activities of the Russian customs bodies. Its constituent part is fighting the administrative offences in the sphere of customs. It should be noted that in the period, which was studied by the author, the amount of violation of customs rules is large and it tends to grow. The methodological basis for the dissertation was formed with the modern achievements of the theory of cognition. In the process of study the author involved general philosophical, theoretical methods (dialectic, systemic methods, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, induction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logical), as well as methods used in the specific social studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). Successful achievement of goals in the sphere of administrative offences cases (namely, timely, comprehensive and objective establishment of circumstances in every case, ruling on every case in strict compliance with the legislation, guaranteeing enforcement of every decision made, revealing the reasons and conditions causing administrative offences, prevention of offences) is to a great extent predefined with having a clear idea on the object of this activity – the object of proof and use of evidence in these cases. Keywords: customs, Union, offence, responsibility, elements of an offence, punishment, regulation, principle, proof, evidence.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Beketov O.I., Rezina N.A. O sootnoshenii obshchego administrativnogo i politseiskogo nadzorov // Politseiskoe pravo. 2006, ¹ 4. S. 47 – 51.
2. Biyushkina N.I. Okhranitel'nye otnosheniya v Rossiiskom gosudarstve v period pravleniya Aleksandra III (mart 1881-go – 1894 god) / N.I. Biyushkina. – N. Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gosuniversiteta, 2010. 355 s.
3. Biyushkina N.I. Politiko-pravovoe razvitie Rossiiskogo gosudarstva v usloviyakh okhranitel'nogo vnutripoliticheskogo kursa (1870 – 1890-e gg.) Avtoref. … dokt. yuridich. nauk: 12.00.01/ N.I. Biyushkina. – N.Novgorod, 2012 g. 55 s.
4. Biyushkina N.I. Politiko-pravovoe razvitie Rossiiskogo gosudarstva v usloviyakh okhranitel'nogo vnutripoliticheskogo kursa (1870 – 1890-e gg.) Dis. … dokt. yuridich. nauk: 12.00.01/ N.I. Biyushkina. – N.Novgorod, 2012 g. 689 s.
5. Biyushkina N.I. Pravovoi status podnadzornykh lits v kontse XIX veka // Vestnik akademii prava i upravleniya. 2011. ¹ 22. S. 107–113.
6. Vysochaishe utverzhdennoe Polozhenie Komiteta Ministrov «O merakh k okhraneniyu gosudarstvennogo poryadka i obshchestvennogo spokoistviya ot 14 avgusta 1881 g. // PSZRI. Izd. 3-e. – SPb.: gos. tip., 1885. T. I. St. 350
7. Vysochaishee utverzhdennoe Polozhenie «O politseiskom nadzore, uchrezhdaemom po rasporyazheniyu administrativnykh vlastei» ot 12 marta 1882 g. // PSZRI. Izd. 3-e. – SPb.: gos. tip., 1886. T. 2. St. 730
8. Gessen V.M. Ocherk administrativnogo prava / V.M. Gessen // Yuridicheskii fakul'tet. Vyp. 1–2. − SPb.: Semeinyi universitet F.S. Komarskogo, 1903. 240 s.
9. Zyryanov S.M. Protsessual'naya forma osushchestvleniya administrativnogo nadzora // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2010, ¹1. S. 74 – 83.
10. Zyryanov S.M. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya administrativnogo nadzora // Vestnik VGU. Seriya Pravo. 2008, ¹2. S. 160 – 162.
11. Kolodeev E.P. Nadzorno-inspektorskaya deyatel'nost' politsii (militsii) Rossii v XVIII−XX vv.: dis. … kand. yuridich. nauk / E.P. Kolodeev. – N. Novgorod: NA MVD RF, 2008. 252 s.
12. TsANO. F. 340. Op. 2. D. 8. L. 19.
13. Martynov A.V. Administrativnyi nadzor v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya, praktika osushchestvleniya i problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya / A.V. Martynov: avtoref. diss. … dokt. yuridich. nauk. – Voronezh, 2010. 56 s.
14. St. 1045 Ustava ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva izd. 1876 g. // SZRI. T. XV. Ch. II. – SPb.: gos. tip., 1876; St. 1 prim. 1 Ustava o preduprezhdenii i presechenii prestuplenii izd. 1890 g. // SZRI. T. XIV. – SPb.: gos. tip., 1890.
15. St. 416 Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva izd. 1892 g. // SZRI. T. XVI. Ch. 1. – SPb.: Izd. Kodif. Otd. pri Gos. Sovete, 1892.
16. St. 58 Ulozheniya o nakazaniyakh ugolovnykh i ispravitel'nykh izd. 1885 g. // SZRI. T. XV. – SPb.: Izd. Kodif. Otd. pri Gos. Sovete., 1885.
17. Tarasov I.T. Lichnoe zaderzhanie kak politseiskaya mera bezopasnosti. Ch. 2 / I.T. Tarasov. – Yaroslavl': Tip. G.V. Fal'k, 1886. 864 s.
18. Tarasov I.T. Ocherk nauki politseiskogo prava / I.T. Tarasov. – M.: pechatnya S.P. Yakovleva, 1897. 718 s.
19. Tulegenov V.V. Pravovye osnovy administrativnogo nadzora i ego znachenie v preduprezhdenii retsidivnoi prestupnosti i kriminal'nogo professionalizma // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2011, ¹ 3 (20). S. 60 – 64.
20. Federal'nyi zakon ot 28 dekabrya 2013 g. N 432-FZ "Ob administrativnom nadzore za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami ot 2 iyulya, 28 dekabrya 2013 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 11 aprelya 2011 g. N 15 st. 2037. Ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. N 27 st. 3477. Ot 28 dekabrya 2013 g. N 52 (chast' I) st. 6997.
21. TsANO. F. 340. Op. 2. D. 8. L. 12, 18
22. TsANO. F. 364. Op. 1. D. 122. L. 3, 3 (ob.), 4, 4 (ob.)
23. Tsirkulyar Departamenta politsii MVD ot 1 dekabrya 1889 g. ¹ 4113. TsANO. F. 364. Op. 1. D. 122. L. 3, 3 (ob.), 4, 4 (ob.).
24. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' (red. F.A. Brokgauz i I.A. Efron). T. 39. – Yaroslavl': Terra, 1992. S. 434−435.
25. http://base.garant.ru/12184517/1/#block_100#ixzz3AXuzLCDF
26. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terroristicheskie_akty,_sovershennye v Rossii
27. Kashkina E.V., Khandogina A.V. Administrativnyi nadzor za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody: problemy pravoprimenitel'noi praktiki // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 6. - C. 375 - 379. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10133.
28. Belyaev V.P. Kontrol'naya i nadzornaya yuridicheskaya deyatel'nost': k voprosu o razgranichenii ponyatii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 2. - C. 245 - 251. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10879.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
