Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Panshin, D.L., Dresvyannikova, E.A. Period and procedure for the implementation of decisions imposing fines in administrative offence cases.

Abstract: It is recognized in the modern administrative legal practice on payment of fines that there is a sixty-days period for the voluntary payment. However, this is not correct. In this article the authors pay attention to the periods when a person may voluntarily implement the decision, and the period when the decision is enforced by a competent official. As a general rule based upon part 1 of Art. 32.2 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation there is a sixty-days period for the voluntary payment of the decision imposing fine in an administrative offence case. That is, there is need for a document proving payment of fine, as well as the information of its payment in the databases. At the same time, no one pays attention to Chapter 31 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation directly providing that a decision on administrative offence case is obligatory for implementation from the moment, when it enters into force. It should be implemented by a judge, official body or an official, who has issued the relevant decision, and the decision should be sent for implementation within three days period, when it should be transferred to an official competent to implement it, and this requirement is not fully conformed to, so the principle of inevitability of punishment.


Keywords:

implementation, proceedings, suspension, extension, period, administrative, offence, decision, body, competent.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Dokuchaeva T.V. Proizvodstvo po zhalobam ob osparivanii postanovleniy organov, dolzhnostnykh lits po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // LEX RUSSICA (RUSSKIY ZAKON). - 2004. - 1. - C. 202 - 217.
2. Prizhennikova A.N. Sostoyanie pravovogo regulirovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: puti resheniya. // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 5. - C. 70 - 85. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8739.html
3. Kurakin A.V. Kompetentsiya politsii v sfere realizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 28 - 48. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8841.html
4. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. ¹ 195-FZ (v red. Federal'nykh zakonov RF ¹ 43-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; ¹ 49-FZ ot 5 aprelya 2013 g.; ¹98-FZ ot 7 maya 2013 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (chast' I). – St. 1.
5. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 g. ¹5 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh» // Rossiyskaya gazeta. – 2005. – ¹ 80. – 19 apr.
6. Federal'nyy zakon ot 02 oktyabrya 2007 g. ¹229-FZ «Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve» (v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. ¹49-FZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2007. – ¹41. – St. 4849.