|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Reference:
Shinkaretskaya G.G., Ryzhov V.B.
Content and Limits of ‘Domaine Reserve’
// SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.
2014. № 2.
P. 134-140.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=65227
Shinkaretskaya G.G., Ryzhov V.B. Content and Limits of ‘Domaine Reserve’Abstract: The category domaine reserve, or «domestic jurisdiction», appeared as a means of restricting the right of international organizations or individual States to interfere in the decisions, or the consequences of decisions, taken by a State. The principle of State sovereignty is increasingly realized as a condition essential for the establishment of effective law and order in the world: More and more often the norms of international law are realized at the national level. One of the examples of this is the sphere of economic interests of States. A State takes a decision and international law fixes this fact, or the decision is taken at an international level and then the State fulfills the norm of international law in its internal system in accordance with its own obligations Keywords: domaine reserve, principle, State sovereignty, effective law, norms, international law, internal system, domestic jurisdiction, national level, international level.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. P. Movchan, Human Rights and International Relations (in Russian), Moscow 1982, 20.
2. Stephen Hall, International Law, Hong Kong, 2006, p.248.
3. Herbert W. Briggs, Reservations to the Acceptance of Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, in: RdC 93 (1958/1), 223—366 (328—363).
4. Rudolf Dolzer, Connally Reservation, in: Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, instalment 1, Amsterdam et ah 1981, 55, 56 (55).
5. Anthony D' Amato, Nicaragua and International Law: The "Academic" and the "Real", in: American Journal of International Law 79 (1985), 657—664 (659).
6. Shetreet, Transnational Protection of Human Rights (Report for the XII Congress of the Academy of Comparative Law), Australia, August 1986.
7. Шинкарецкая Г.Г.. Международный уголовный суд: попытка оценки // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – № 1. – С. 88-95. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593.
8. Abgarjan D... Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules in different spheres of the Ocean Activity // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – № 1. – С. 96-106. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11622.
9. Костенко Н.И.. Роль Организации Объединенных Наций по решению проблем правосудия переходного периода и господства права в конфликтных // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 560-571. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10012.
10. Каламкарян Р.А.. Международный суд как главный судебный орган Организации Объединенных Наций // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 210-232. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737.
11. Р.А. Каламкарян. Роль Международного Суда ООН в деле поддержания международного правопорядка // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 1. – С. 92-103. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.6.
12. Каламкарян Р.А. Роль Международного Суда ООН в деле поддержания международного правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 1.-С.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
13. Каламкарян Р.А. Включенность Российской Федерации в деятельность Международного Суда ООН в деле обеспечения международной законности и правопорядка // NB: Международное право. — 2013.-№ 2.-С.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
14. Федорченко А.А. Право международных уголовных трибуналов // NB: Международное право. — 2014.-№ 1.-С.87-103. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2014.1.11639. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_11639.htm
15. Abgarjan D.. Elaboration by ITLOS of the Law of the Sea Rules in different spheres of the Ocean Activity // Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations.-2014.-1.-C. 96-106. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11622
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
