Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Trends and management
Reference:

Borodin, E.A. Conceptual fundamental bases for a reasonable approach towards the global politics and role of reasoning global political process.

Abstract: This article is devoted to the study of the role of reason in the modern political processes, global politics and foreign policy of nation states. The author attempts to clarify the basic terms related to the term “reason (mind)” and to show how the “reason” factor is perceived by the participants of political process and political relations. It is established that “reason” is a rather complicated structure. In political and social human activities, it may be manifested in various levels as individual, collective and distributed reason. And there is also a complex manifestation. Appearance of the network structures in the organization of the modern society births the new form of existence of reason, such as network forms, which reflect themselves upon the reasonability criteria and evaluation of certain foreign political strategies or political courses as reasonable. As a result, it becomes obvious, that speaking of reasonable policy, we often mean various bases and criteria for reasonability. Moreover, different cultures have different ideas of reason and reasonability in political activities, which are based upon their traditions and social values. At the same time the noosphere teaching of V.I. Vernadskiy allows to synthesize various approaches to reason and its role in politics into a comprehensive paradigm, connecting them via the modern noo-vitism ideology.


Keywords:

administration, politics, reason noovitism, noosphere, Vernadskiy, state, interests, values, security.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kozikov I.A. M.V. Lomonosov, D.I. Mendeleev, V.I. Vernadskiy o Rossii. – M.: Izd-vo Mosk. Un-ta, 2011. – 504 s.
2. Vernadskiy, V.I. Biosfera i noosfera / V.I. Vernadskiy. – M. :Ayris-Press : Rol'f, 2002. –S.479.
3. Borodin E.A. Noovitizm. Sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. M.: Grifon. 2012. 240 s.
4. Borodin E.A. Vvedenie v noovitizm. M.: Grifon. 2012. 88 s.
5. Vanyushin, V.A. Organizatsiya obshchestva s ustoychivym razvitiem i puti dvizheniya k nemu / V.A. Vanyushin, O.L. Kuznetsov // Na puti k ustoychivomu razvitiyu Rossii: navstrechu Vsemir. sammitu v g. Yokhannesburge : sb.st. / pod red. K.A. Stepanova. – M., 2002.-S. 25
6. Manoylo A.V. “Tsvetnye revolyutsii” 2011–14 gg.: uroki “Arabskoy vesny” i Ukrainy. / Nauchnyy doklad na zasedanii uchenogo soveta fakul'teta politologii MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova. Kod dostupa: http://polit.msu.ru/department/news/475/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.05.2014).
7. Manoylo A.V. Vooruzhennyy myatezh v Ukraine mozhet stat' dlya Rossii poslednim trevozhnym zvonkom // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2014.-¹ 2.-S.24-37. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.2.11137. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11137.html
8. Fedyakin I.V. Megapolisy kak sub'ekty politiki: istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 88-93. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10165.
9. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika.-2014.-5.-C. 620-629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
10. Filippov V.R. Burkina Faso: politicheskiy krizis 2011 goda // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 424-438. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9721.
11. Manoylo A.V. O protivodeystvii rasprostraneniyu ideologii «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» v universitetskoy studencheskoy srede // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 420-423. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9755.
12. Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma: ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 487-468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
13. Mekhed G.N. Moral' kak absolyutnyy predel razuma v etike I. Kanta // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 5.-S.17-44. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.5.12351. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_12351.html
14. Belyaev V.A. Konstruiruem kriticheskuyu filosofiyu I.Kanta kak «filosofskuyu reformatsiyu» i «kritiku kul'turnogo razuma» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 3.-S.60-99. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.3.11222. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11222.html
15. Belyaev V.A. Kritika religioznogo razuma Yu.Khabermasa kak chast' kritiki kul'turnogo razuma // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.20-64. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1.10709. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_10709.html
16. Spirova E.M.. «Chelovek svedushchiy» (homo intelligens). // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2014.-¹ 1.-C. 22-32. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.1.10703
17. Nagoev Z.V., Denisenko V.A.. Sintez intellektual'nogo povedeniya agenta na osnove rekursivnoy kognitivnoy arkhitektury. // Programmnye sistemy i vychislitel'nye metody.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 323-329. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6061.2013.4.1055