Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Rozin, V. M. Formation of the Ancient Thinking Methodological, Phenomenological, Technological and Institutional Aspects

Abstract: The author of the article offers a new outlook on the process of ancient thinking formation. The novelty of the research is that the author tries to show that from the very beginning, thinking has had both methodological and phenomenological aspect, although the latter were not understood specifically due to the fact that philosophical disciplines were formed only in the culture of the Early Modern Period. Moreover, the author of the present article suggests that we should view Aristotle’s rules and thinking categories as the creation of some kind of the intellectual technology as well as the first attempt to design the institution of thinking. The author substantiates his new views on ancient thinking based on the analysis of the genesis and development of ancient philosophy as well as the description Parmenides’, Plato’s and Aristotle’s views. Noteworthy that the author shows that the concept of thinking introduced by Parmenides was nothing else but the image of the intellectual path and discussion of certain criteria showing whether the path was correct or not. After him Plato and Aristotle discussed how to put the idea into life and convey the solution (method) to others. Solution of the aforesaid problems results in creation of the concept of the ancient thinking.


Keywords:

cogitation (thinking), methodology, phenomenology, technology, institution, reasoning, knowledge, personality, rules, categories.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vspomnim, kstati, i F.Bekona, kotoryi spustya dve tysyachi let ispol'zuet tu zhe metaforu puti («razum, kotoryi vstrechaet zdes' povsyudu stol'ko zaputannykh dorog, stol' obmanchivye podobiya veshchei i znakov, stol' izvilistye i slozhnye petli i uzly prirody…»), i obsuzhdaet usloviya uspeshnosti nauchnogo puteshestviya v poznanii prirody («Nado napravit' nashi shagi putevodnoi nit'yu i po opredelennomu pravilu obezopasit' vsyu dorogu, nachinaya ot pervykh vospriyatii chuvstv neobkhodimo vvesti luchshee i bolee sovershennoe upotreblenie chelovecheskogo dukha i razuma put' k etomu nam otkrylo ne kakoe-libo inoe sredstvo, kak tol'ko spravedlivoe i zakonnoe prinizhenie chelovecheskogo dukha»). Bekon F. Velikoe vosstanovlenie nauk // Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T.1. M., 1971. S. 68-69.
2. Podstrochnik iz http://ancientrome.ru/antlitr/parmenid/parmen.htm v izdanii: «Ellinskie poety VIII—III vv. do n.e.», M., 1999. Tam zhe snoska: «Parmenid iz Elei v Yuzhnoi Italii (konets VI — nachalo V v. (ok. 540—470? ok. 520—450?)..
3. Platon. Parmenid. Soch. v 4 t. T.2. M., 1993. S. 357.
4. Aristotel'. Analitiki pervaya i vtoraya. M., 1952. S. 14.
5. V zavisimosti ot ispol'zovaniya odno i to zhe obshchee znanie moglo byt' kategoriei i ne yavlyat'sya takovoi. Esli eto znanie ispol'zovalos' dlya zadaniya kharakteristik ideal'nogo ob''ekta, osobenno v sluchae primeneniya opredelennogo pravila, to ono vystupalo kak kategoriya. Vne etogo konteksta eto bylo prosto obshchee znanie. Vot pochemu v raznykh knigakh Aristotel' daet raznye perechni kategorii.
6. Aristotel'. Analitiki... Str. 14.
7. Aristotel'. Pervaya Analitika. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh, t. 2. M., 1978. S. 119.
8. Aristotel'. O dushe. M., 1937. S. 288.
9. Aristotel'. O dushe. S. 73.
10. Tam zhe. S. 97, 99.
11. Aristotel'. Metafizika. M.,-L., 1934. S. 211.
12. Rozin V.M. Istoriya stanovleniya monashestva kak sotsial'nogo instituta // NB: Istoricheskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 212 - 263. DOI: 10.7256/2306-420X.2012.1.335. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/hr/article_335.html