Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Schebetenko, S. A., Vaynshtein, S. V. The Big Five of Personality Features: Explicit-Implicit Approach

Abstract: The authors of the article present a correlation research of personality features in accordance with the two levels of processing of social information by an individual: explicit (central) and implicit (associative) levels. 152 University students participated in the research. The researchers studied the Big Five of personality features from the point of view of the paradigm of multivariate analysis. Explicit features were measured based on the Big Five Inventory questionnaire and the implicit features were measured by the means of the Implicit Association Test. Implicit feature tests had a greater intra-method correlation than the explicit features. Moreover, the inter-scale and intermethod correlation of personality features was significantly low compared to the intra-method correlation factor but only in case of implicit features. The 1–fator model of the implicit features proved to be practically applicable which allowed to support the hypothesis about the general personality factor at the implicit level. The 1–factor model of explicit features proved to be not applicable. The level of extraversion had a better coherence of the explicit and implicit levels. It has been stated that at the first stage of testing the implicit features, individuals had a good control of their emotions which was expressed in better and more socially desired reactions.

Keywords:

personality features, implicit social cognition, Big Five, multivariate analysis, openness to experience, Implicit Association Test, extraversion, friendliness, fidelity, neuroticism.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shchebetenko S.A. Ustanovki na cherty lichnosti v kontekste Bol'shoy Pyaterki // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki (na retsenzii).
2. Khromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyy oprosnik lichnosti: Uchebno-metodicheskoe poso-bie. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gos. universiteta, 2000. 23 s.
3. Ozhegov S.I. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka: onlayn-versiya. 2007-2010. URL: http://www.ozhegov.org
4. Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Yu., Dorfman L.Ya., Aleksandrova L A. Operatsionalizatsiya pyatifaktornoy modeli lichnostnykh chert na rossiyskoy vyborke // Psikhol. diagnostika (v pechati).
5. Knyazev G.G., Mitrofanova L.G., Bocharov V.A. Validizatsiya russkoyazychnoy ver-sii oprosnika L. Goldberga “Markery faktorov «Bol'shoy Pyaterki»” // Psikhol. zhurn. 2010. T. 31. ¹ 5. S. 100-110.
6. Efremova T.F. Bol'shoy sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. 2006. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/traditional_contents.php/efremova
7. Goldberg L.R., Shmelev A.G. Mezhkul'turnoe issledovanie leksiki lichnost-nykh chert: “Bol'shaya pyaterka” faktorov v angliyskom i russkom yazykakh // Psikhol. zhurn. 1993. T. 14. ¹ 4. S. 32–39.
8. S. 41-45. 3. Burlachuk L.F., Korolev D.K. Adaptatsiya oprosnika dlya diagnostiki pyati fak-torov lichnosti // Voprosy psikhologii. 2000. ¹ 1. S. 126-134.
9. Bocharov A.V., Knyazev G.G., Slobodskaya E.R., Ryabichenko T.I. Svyaz' mezhdu eks-plitsitnymi i implitsitnymi otsenkami agressivnosti: vliyanie pola, vozrasta i so-tsial'noy zhelatel'nosti // Byulleten' Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAMN. 2007. ¹
10. Baddli A., Ayzenk M., Anderson M. Pamyat'. – SPb.: Piter, 2011. 560 s.
11. Shchebetenko S.A., Vaynshteyn S.V. Ob izmerenii chert lichnosti posredstvom vremeni reaktsii (Chast' 1: postanovka problemy) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 82-95.
12. Shchebetenko S.A., Vaynshteyn S.V. Ob izmerenii chert lichnosti posredstvom vremeni reaktsii (Chast' II: rezul'taty issledovaniya) // Vestnik Permskogo universi-teta: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya, 2010, 4, S. 52-72.
13. Allport, G.W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psy-chological Monographs, 47.
14. Anderson, R.D. (2009). The Implicit Association Test for conscientiousness: An indirect method of measuring personality. Unpublished manuscript for the degree of Master of Arts. URL: http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi/Anderson%20Ryan%20D.pdf?bgsu1237835643
15. Anderson, T.W. (1957). Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. Journ. of the American Statistical Asso-ciation, 52, 200–203.
16. Arbuckle, J.L. (2012). Amos 21 Users Guide. Amos Development Corporation.
17. Asendorpf, J.B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between im-plicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393.
18. Back, M.D., Schmuckle, S.C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journ.of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 2009, 97, 533-548.
19. Campbell D.T., & Fiske D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.
20. Chang, L., Connelly, B.S., & Geeza, A.A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta-analytic multitrait-multimethod approach. Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 408-426.
21. DeYoung, C.G., Peterson, J.B., & Higgins, D.M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552.
22. Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S.C. (2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455.
23. Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor struc-ture. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
24. Goldberg, L.R. (2001). International Personality Items Pool, IPIP. URL: http://ipip.ori.org/
25. Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.
26. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
27. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
28. John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Ver-sions 4a and 5. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
29. John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., & Soto, C.J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (P. 114-158). NY: Guilford Press.
30. Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A.J., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
31. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journ. of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.
32. Nosek, B.A., & Smyth, F.L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Im-plicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Ex-perimental Psychology, 54, 14-29.
33. Rushton, J.P., Bons, T.A., Ando, J., Hur, Y.-M., Irwing, P., Vernon, P.A.,... Bar-baranelli, C. (2009). A general factor of personality from multitrait–multimethod data and cross–national twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 356–365.
34. Rushton, J.P., & Irwing, P. (2008). A general factor of personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 679–683.
35. Schmukle, S.C., Back, M.D., & Egloff, B. (2008). Validity of the five factor model for the implicit self-concept of personality. European Journ. of Psychological Assessment, 24, 263-272.
36. Steffens, M.C., & Schulze-König, S. (2006). Predicting spontaneous Big Five be-havior with Implicit Association Tests. European Journ. of Psychological Assessment, 22, 13-20.
37. Tupes, E.C., & Christal, R.E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journ. of Personality, 60, 225–251.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.