National Security
Reference:
Kireeva, N.V.
On systemic approach to defining the main
categories of the general security theory.
// National Security.
2013. ¹ 6.
P. 11-26.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63868
Abstract:
The definition apparatus within the
general security theory is not completely formed,
which is unfortunate. The legislatively recognized
definition of security as “condition of protection
of vital interests of person, society and state
from internal and external threats’ does not
seem appropriate, since the term “condition”
characterizes the changes in the matters, and does
not allow to establish their common substantial
features. Defining security as “protection” seems
overly direct and simplified, since it presupposes
the possibility of achieving an ideal situation,
which is actually impossible to achieve. Defining
security threats as “combination of conditions
and factors, forming danger to vital interests of
person, society and state” is tautological, and it also
causes many researchers to generate a maximum
number of negative factors, leading to formation
of a overly large specter of causes, having negative
influence on the process of development, making
it hard to specify and evaluate them. The author
of this article attempts to uncover the contents of
key elements of general security theory from the
standpoint of systemic analysis.
1.
|
G. G. Gazimagomedov, L. V. Davydov Konfliktnye osnovaniya politicheskoi bezopasnosti v sovremennoi Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-2.-C. 9-21.
|
2.
|
Perov E.V. Teoriya i analiz sotsial'noi konfliktogennosti obshchestva // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-5.-C. 67-141. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_2308.html
|
3.
|
Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
|
4.
|
Ursul A.D. Sinergeticheskii podkhod k issledovaniyu bezopasnosti // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2012.-2.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.2.207. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_207.html.
|
5.
|
Ursul A.D. Obespechenie natsional'noi bezopasnosti cherez prioritety ustoichivogo razvitiya // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-1.-C. 1-61. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_325.html
|
6.
|
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Problema bezopasnosti: global'nye i universal'no-evolyutsionnye aspekty // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2012.-1.-C. 81-159. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.67. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_67.html
|
7.
|
Williamson P.J. Variants of Corporatism: Theory and Practice. – Cambridge, 1985.
|
8.
|
Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoichivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-2.-C. 1-66. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html
|
9.
|
Dahrendorf R. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, 1959.
|
10.
|
Boulding K.E. Conflict and Defence: A General Theory. – N.-Y., Harper and Brothers, 1962.
|
11.
|
Filosofiya politiki. Kniga II. Zakonomernosti i zakony politicheskogo protsessa. M.: Luch, 1993. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 1983.
|
12.
|
Ursul A.D. Priroda bezopasnosti. // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2008. ¹ 1.
|
13.
|
Ursul A.D. Printsip «bezopasnost' cherez ustoichivoe razvitie»: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskii analiz // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. 2009. ¹ 2.
|
14.
|
Toinbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii / Per. s angl. M., 1991.
|
15.
|
Soros Dzh. Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. M., 1999.
|
16.
|
Strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2020 goda. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 maya 2009 goda ¹ 537.
|
17.
|
Smul'skii S.V. Interesy Rossii: strategicheskii kurs. // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. 2008, ¹ 6(56).
|
18.
|
Sorokin P.A. O tak nazyvaemykh faktorakh sotsial'noi evolyutsii / P.A.Sorokin. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. / Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1992.
|
19.
|
Smul'skii S.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy upravleniya konfliktami v mezhdunarodnykh sistemakh. Diss. … d. polit. n. – M., 1997.
|
20.
|
Larin V.A. Bezopasnost' razvitiya i razvitie bezopasnosti. // Svobodnaya mysl'. 1996. ¹ 7.
|
21.
|
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 1.
|
22.
|
Problemy bezopasnosti. Byulleten' Fonda «Nauka-XXI». 2008. ¹ 4.
|
23.
|
Prokhozhev A.A. Natsional'naya bezopasnost': teoriya, sushchnost', problemy. Lektsiya. M.: Izd-vo RAGS. 2005.
|
24.
|
Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
|
25.
|
Kaluzhskii M.L. «Sistemnost'»-novaya traktovka ponyatiya. // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2004. ¹ 4
|
26.
|
Kortunov S.V. Stanovlenie politiki bezopasnosti: Formirovanie politiki natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii v kontekste globalizatsii. – M.: Nauka, 2003.
|
27.
|
Zolotareva E.V. Gruppy interesov v politike // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. – Seriya: Politologiya. – 1999. ¹ 1.
|
28.
|
Zdravomyslov A.G. Problema interesa v sotsiologicheskoi teorii. – L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1964.
|
29.
|
Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya. T.5. M.-L., 1937.
|
30.
|
Global'nye vyzovy, ugrozy i opasnosti sovremennosti. Prioritety politiki obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Pod obshch. red. A.V.Vozzhenikova]. – M.: Izd-vo RAGS, 2008.
|
31.
|
Bogdanov A.A. Tektologiya. Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka. – M., 1922.
|
32.
|
Andreevskii I.E. Politseiskoe pravo. T.1. Ch.1. Politsiya bezopasnosti. SPb., 1874.
|
33.
|
Bel'kov O.A., Miroshnichenko V.M. Opasnost' kak sotsial'noe yavlenie i nauchnoe ponyatie. // Problemy bezopasnosti. Byulleten' Nauchno-issledovatel'skogo tsentra «Nauka-XXI». 2008. ¹ 1.
|