|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Bogdanova, V. O.
Metamorphoses of Subjectivity in Constructivist Models
// Philosophy and Culture.
2013. ¹ 12.
P. 1707-1717.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63603
Bogdanova, V. O. Metamorphoses of Subjectivity in Constructivist ModelsAbstract: The article is devoted to constructivist models of philosophizing in terms of their succession and interdependence in accordance with particular historically developed traditions of philosophizing. The author of the article defines the three types of constructivist models of philosophizing: constructivist hylomorphism, constructivist eidetics and constructivist hermeneutics. In constructivist hylomorphism the basic constructs are a priori forms of cognition that create prerequisites for subjectivity, in constructivist eidetics – phenomena of consciousness that ensure the subjectivity of the world and in constructivist hermeneutics – communication means that create conditions for inter-subjectivity. Keywords: philosophy, subject, epistemology, knowledge, constructivism, philosophizing, typology, hylomorphism, eidetic, hermeneutics.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii zna-niya. M.: Medum, 1995.
2. Vitgenshtein L. O dostovernosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. ¹ 2. S. 67–120. 3. Gutner G. B. Gileomorfizm, eidetika i kommunikativnye praktiki // Nauka: ot metodologii k ontologii. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 152–167. 4. Kasavin I. T. Konst ru k tivizm: za yavlennye prog rammy i nereshennye problemy // Epistemologiya & filosofiya nauki. 2008. T. X V. ¹ 1. S. 5–14. 5. Knyazeva E. N. Epistemologicheskii konstruktivizm // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 12: Fenomen soznaniya. M.: IF RAN, 2006. S. 133–152. 6. Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya / O tv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: IF RAN, 2008. 7. Konstruktivistskii podkhod v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke / Otv. red. V. A. Lektorskii. M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. 8. Konstruktivizm v epistemologii i naukakh o cheloveke: (materialy «Kruglogo stola») // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. ¹ 3. S. 18. 9. Levi-Stross K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M.: EKSMO-Press, 2001. 10. Lektorskii V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2009. 11. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 12. Merlo-Ponti M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya. SPb.: Yuventa, Nauka, 1999. 1 3 . O b s u zh d aem s t at 'i o kons t r u k t i vi zme (V. P. F i l at ov, I. T. K as a vi n, G. I. R u z a vi n, A . Yu. A n t o n o v s k i i) // E p i s t e m o l o g i ya & f i l o s o f i ya n a u k i . 2 0 0 9 . T. X X . ¹ 2 . S . 1 4 4 –1 5 6 . 14. Ulanovskii A. M. Konstruktivizm, radikal'nyi konstruktivizm, sotsial'nyi konstrukti-vizm: mir kak interpretatsiya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. ¹ 2. S. 35–45. 15. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya: vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
