Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Karpenko, A. S. Principle of Plentitude in Philosophy. Part II

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes logical consequence of the principle of abundance described by Arthur Lovejoy in his book ‘The Great Chain of Being’ (1936). Arthur Lovejoy asserts that all potentials of existence must be fulfilled. The principle of abundance is completed with the principle of plentitude that requires practical implementation of all what is thought to be possible. Fulfillment of the principle of plentitude causes numerous ‘stratifications’ of space, time, world and all. This is the conclusion modern cosmology has come to as well. To save ourselves from absolute chaos, we need to limit the principle of plentitude. Therefore, we approach the most fundamental problem in ontology: how does the impossible become possible? The series includes the following articles: 1. Introduction. 2. The Great Chain of Being. 3. The principle of abundance. 4. The unified. 5. Theodicy. 6. Ontological evidence of God’ s existence. 7. The problem of eternity. 8. The limits. 9. The impossible. 10. Theories of incompleteness. 11. Borders of mind? 12. Destiny of human. 13. Everett worlds. 14. The principle of plentitude in action. 15. On the way to intelligent Multiverse. Annex. Alternative Reality: Gaius Iulius Caesar.

Keywords:

Everett worlds, borders of mind, undecidability, Godel about incompleteness, impossibility, eternity, theodicy, principle of abundance, Multiverse, symmetric distortion.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1976-1984.
2. Anisov A.M. Kak vozmozhno vozmozhnoe? // Logiko-filosofskie issledovaniya. 2012. ¹ 5. S. 101-129.
3. Barrou D. Novye teorii vsego. V poiskakh okonchatel'nogo ob''yasneniya. Minsk: Popurri, 2012.
4. Born M. Nepreryvnost', determinizm, real'nost' // Born M. Razmyshleniya i vospominaniya fizika. M.: Nauka, 1977. S. 162-187.
5. Vainberg S. Mechty ob okonchatel'noi teorii. Fizika v poiskakh samykh fundamental'nykh zakonov prirody. 2-e izd. M.: Editorial URSS, 2008.
6. Vasil'ev N.A. Voobrazhaemaya logika. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Nauka, 1989.
7. Vilenkin A. Mir mnogikh mirov. Fiziki v poiskakh inykh vselennykh. M.: Astrel'; CORPUS, 2011.
8. Vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe v kibernetike / Pod. red. A. Berga. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963.
9. Grin B. Elegantnaya Vselennaya. Superstruny, skrytye razmernosti i poiski okonchatel'noi teorii. 5-e izd. M.: Librokom URSS, 2011.
10. Grin B. Skrytaya real'nost': Parallel'nye miry i glubinnye zakony kosmosa. M.: Librokom URSS, 2012.
11. Grof K. Kogda nevozmozhnoe vozmozhno: Priklyucheniya v neobychnykh real'nos¬tyakh. M.: ACT i dr., 2007.
12. Guseinov A.A. Moral' kak predel ratsional'nosti // Ratsional'nost' i ee granitsy / Pod red. A.A. Guseinova i V.A. Lektorskgo. M.: IF RAN, 2012. S. 101-126.
13. Dyumulen G. Istoriya Dzen-buddizma. M.: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2003.
14. Doich D. Struktura real'nosti. Izhevsk.: NITs «Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika», 2001.
15. Ivanov E.M. Gedelevskii argument // K probleme “vychislimosti” funktsii soznaniya. 2004. URL: http://ivanem.chat.ru/godel1.htm.
16. Kazyutinskii V.V. Antropnyi printsip i mir postneklassicheskoi nauki // Astronomiya i sovremennaya kartina mira / Pod red. V.V. Kazyutinskogo. M.: IF RAN, 1996. S. 144-182.
17. Kaký M. Parallel'nye miry: O6 ustroistve mirozdaniya, vysshikh izmereniyakh i budushchem Kosmosa. M.: OOO Izd-vo «Sofiya», 2008.
18. Knyazeva E.N. Priroda kreativnosti v zerkale kreativnosti prirody // Epistemologiya kreativnosti / Pod red. E.N. Knyazevoi. M.: Kanon+, 2012. S. 10-47.
19. Lebedev Yu.A. Neodnoznachnoe mirozdanie. Kostroma, 2000.
20. Linde A. Inflyatsiya, kvantovaya kosmologiya i antropnyi printsip. 2001. URL: http://www.astronet.ru/db/msg/1181211.
21. Lir T., Mettsner R., Olpert R. Psikhodelicheskii opyt. Rukovodstvo na osnove «Tibetskoi knige mertvykh». L'vov: Initsiativa; Kiev: Nika-tsentr, 1998.
22. Meinong A. Teoriya predmetov // Epistemologiya & Filosofiya Nauki. 2011. T. XXVII. ¹ 1. S. 202-229.
23. Menskii M.B. Kontseptsiya soznaniya v kontekste kvantovoi mekhaniki // Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. 2005. T. 175. ¹ 4. S. 415-434.
24. Menskii M.B. Soznanie i kvantovaya mekhanika: zhizn' v parallel'nykh mirakh: (chudesa soznaniya – iz kvantovoi real'nosti). Fryazino: Vek 2, 2011.
25. Metavselennaya, prostranstvo, vremya / Red. V.V. Kazyutinskii. M.: IF RAN, 2013.
26. Nagel' E., N'yumen Dzh. R. Teorema Gedelya. 2-e izd., ispr. M.: URSS; Krasand, 2010.
27. Nurullin R.A. Virtual'nost' kak uslovie sushchestvovaniya real'nosti // Vest¬nik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnaya seriya. 2005. T. ¹ 4. S. 5-12.
28. Pavlenko A.N. Printsip «nablyudaemosti»: pochemu nerealizuema teoriya beskonechnoi Vselennoi? // Pavlenko A.N. Filosofskie problemy kosmologii: Vselennaya iz "nichego" ili Vselennaya iz "nebytiya"? M.: URSS, 2012.
29. Panov A.D. Veroyatnostnaya interpretatsiya antropnogo printsipa i Mul'tivers // Sovremennaya kosmologiya: filosofskie gorizonty / Pod red. V.V. Kazyutinskogo. M.: Kanon+; ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2011. S. 270-293.
30. Panov A.D. Priroda matematiki, kosmologii i struktura real'nosti: fizicheskie osnovaniya matematiki // Metavselennaya, prostranstvo, vremya / Pod red. V.V. Kazyutinskogo. M.: IF RAN, 2013. S. 74-103.
31. Penrouz R. Novyi um korolya. O komp'yuterakh, myshlenii i zakonakh fiziki. 4-e izd. M.: LKI, 2011.
32. Penrouz R. Teni razuma: V poiskakh nauki o soznanii. M.–Izhevsk: IKI, 2011.
33. Psevdonimy / Sostavlenie A.S. Karpenko. M.-SPb.: TsGI, 2011.
34. Seval'nikov A.Yu. Triadnaya model' v opisanii virtual'noi real'nosti // Epistemologiya: perspektivy razvitiya / Pod red. V.A. Lektorskogo. M.: Kanon+, 2012. S. 512-533.
35. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.
36. Tegmark M. Parallel'nye vselennye // V mire nauki. 2003. ¹ 8. S. 23-33.
37. Uilber K. Velikaya tsep' bytiya // Puti za predely ego / Pod red. R. Uolsha i F. Voon. M.: Otkrytyi Mir, 2006.
38. Khintikka Ya. Ratsional'nost', logika i ikh predely // Ratsional'nost' i ee granitsy / Pod red. A.A. Guseinova i V.A. Lektorskgo. M.: IF RAN, 2012. S. 21-33.
39. Khoruzhii S.S. Rod ili nedorod? Zametki k ontologii virtual'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1997. ¹ 6. S. 53-68.
40. Chernin A. D. Kosmologiya: Bol'shoi vzryv. Fryazino: Vek 2, 2006.
41. Epshtein M. Filosofiya vozmozhnogo. Modal'nosti v myshlenii i kul'ture. SPb: Aleteiya, 2001.
42. Barrett J. Everett's relative-state formulation of quantum mechanics // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy. 2010. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-everett/.
43. Barrow J. and Tipler F. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
44. Benacerraf P. God, the devil, and Gödel // The Monist. 1967. Vol. 5. P. 9-32.
45. Bruce C. Schrödinger’s Rabbits: The Many Worlds of Quantum. Joseph Henry Press, 2004.
46. Byrne P. The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family. Oxford University Press, 2010.
47. Chaitin G.J. The Unknowable. Singapore, 1999.
48. Dreyfus H. What Computers Still Can't Do. New York: MIT Press, 1992.
49. Everett H. Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics // Review of Modern Physics. 1957. Vol. 29. P. 454-462. (Cm. polnuyu versiyu: The Theory of the Universal Wave Function // The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics / Eds. B. De Witt and N. Graham. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973).
50. Feferman S. Gödel's incompleteness theorems, free will and mathematical thought // Free Will and Modern Science / Ed. R. Swinburne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 102-122.
51. Gell-Mann M. What is complexity? // Complexity. 1995. Vol. 1. ¹ 1. P. 16-19.
52. Gödel K. Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their implications // Gödel K. Collected Works III. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. P. 304-323.
53. Kreisel G. Which number theoretic problems can be solved in recursive progressions on path through 0? // The Journal of Sym¬bolic Logic. 1972. Vol. 37. P. 311-334.
54. Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
55. Lockwood, M. Many minds interpretations of quantum mechanics // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 1996. Vol. 47. ¹ 2. P. 159–188.
56. Lucas J.R. Minds, machines, and Gödel // Philosophy. 1961. Vol. 36. P. 112-137.
57. Lucas J. R. Minds, machines, and Gödel: A retrospect // Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing. Vol. 1 / Eds. P.J.R. Millican and A. Clark. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. P. 138-164.
58. Megill J. The Lucas-Penrose Argument about Gödel’s Theorem // Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2012. URL: http://www.iep.utm.edu/lp-argue/#H5.
59. Shapiro S. Incompleteness, mechanism, and optimism // The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic. 1998. Vol. 4. P. 273-302.
60. Shapiro S. Mechanism, truth, and Penrose’s new argument // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2003. Vol. 32. P. 19-42.
61. Tegmark M. The Mathematical Universe // Foundations of Physics. 2008. Vol. 38. ¹ 2. P. 101-150.
62. The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955-1980 with Commentary / Eds. J.A. Barrett and P. Byrne. Princeton University Press, 2012.
63. Vaidman L. Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy. 2012. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/.
64. Webb J. Mechanism, Mentalism and Metamathematics: An Essay on Finitism. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1996.
65. Wheeler J.A. Genesis and observership // Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences / Eds. R. Butts and J. Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977. P. 3-33.
66. Wheeler J.A. Information, physics, quantum: The search for links // Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information / Ed. W.H. Zurek. Addison-Wesley, 1990. P. 3-28
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.