Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Sineokaya, Yu. V. Truth as the Opposite Side of Deceit

Abstract: The article is devoted to analyzing the phenomenon of lying. Even though it may seem like a paradox, one of the most efficient and therefore most common methods of up-bringing of the younger generation (including detection of child’s fraud) is the parent’s lie. Negative consequences of the parent’s lie are quite obvious and include fear, anxiety, feeling lonely and abandoned that are growing inside a child under the influence of his parent’s threats and child’s imagination. The author shares her opinion on whether the parent’s lie actually makes a child obedient and how it forms the understanding of ethics of truth. The author also discusses the long-term effects of the parent’s deceit on a child’s perception of himself and his parents and answers the question whether the parent’s lie can be excused and what other methods except for lying can be used by parents in up-bringing. It is quite obvious that lies do not help to establish moral principles and ethics. The author speaks out against a common social stereotype according to which lying cannot be used as a tool of up-bringing and a mean of socialization.


Keywords:

anthropology, ethics, existence, child’s deceit, parent’s lie, social stereotype, socialization of child, creative intellect, cognitive skills, pedagogy, teaching.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. «Zhil chelovek»: 101 pritcha. Sbornik khristianskikh pritch i skazaniy. M., Nikeya, 2011.
2. Ien L. Prirozhdennye lzhetsy. My ne mozhem zhit' bez obmana, M., Ripol Klassik, 2012.
3. Nitsshe F., Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe, Poln. sobr. soch. v 13 tt, M., Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2011, t. 2.
4. Tolstoy L.N. Lgun. Sobr. soch. v 20 tt., M., Gos. izdatel'stvo khud. literatury, 1963, t. 10.
5. Tolstoy L.N. Kostochka: Byl'. Sobr. soch. v 22 tt., M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1982, t.10.
6. Baron-Cohen, S. Autism and Asperger Syndrome: The Facts. OUP, 2008.
7. Byrne Richard R. The Thinking Ape: Evolutionary Origins of Intelligence. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
8. Camden. C.T., Motley M.T., Wilson A. Whites lies in interpersonal communication: a taxonomy and (preliminary) investigation og social motivations // Western journal of Speech Communication, 1984, N 48.
9. De Paulo B.M., Kashy D.A. Everyday lies in close and casual relationships // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, N 33.
10. Dunbar Robin. How Many Friends Does One Person Need: Dunbar's Number and Other Evolutionary Quirks. London: Faber & Faber, 2010.
11. Gail D.Heyman, Anna S. Hsu, Genyue Fu, Kang Lee, Eric Jackman. Instrumental lying by parents in the US and China // International Journal of Psychology, 2012, 1.
12. Humphrey Nicholas K. The social function of intellect. In Growing Points in Ethology, ed. P. P. G. Bateson and R. A. Hinde, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.
13. Kind A. Creative mothering: Lies and the lying mothers who tell them. In S.Lintott (Ed.) Motherhood: The birth of wisdom. Chichester. UK: Blackwell, 2010